View clinical trials related to Bacteremia.
Filter by:The World Health Organization, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (AMMI) Canada, and Health Canada have all declared antimicrobial resistance a global threat to health, based on rapidly increasing resistance rates and declining new drug development. Up to 30-50% of antibiotic use is inappropriate, and excessive durations of treatment are the greatest contributor to inappropriate use. Shorter duration treatment (≤7 days) has been shown in meta-analyses to be as effective as longer antibiotic treatment for a range of mild to moderate infections. A landmark trial in critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia showed that mortality and relapse rates were non-inferior in patients who received 8 vs 15 days of treatment. Similar adequately powered randomized trial evidence is lacking for the treatment of patients with bloodstream infections caused by a wide spectrum of organisms.
Prospective study at Duke University Hospital comparing the Karius Infectious Disease Diagnostic Sequencing Assay to blood culture results in admitted patients with bacteremia/septicemia.
The purpose of our study is to examine the effects of a second antibiotic, daptomycin, in combination with a beta lactam antibiotic on treating bloodstream infection caused by methicillin-susceptible S. aureus.
The burden of bloodstream infections is large and increasing over time. Antibiotic overuse continues to drive increased rates of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens across Canada. However, prospective audits have revealed that 30-50% of antibiotic utilization is unnecessary or inappropriate. If shorter duration therapy is as effective as longer duration therapy for these infections, antimicrobial consumption would be decreased. A pilot trial (approved by the Sunnybrook Research Ethics Board), is underway in critically ill patients at 17 Canadian ICUs. Investigators have successfully demonstrated feasibility with respect to protocol adherence and recruitment rates in the ICU. Investigators now aim to conduct a similar pilot RCT among non-ICU patients admitted to hospital wards with bloodstream infections to determine feasibility and protocol adherence of the same trial protocol.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter (Seraph 100) is safe in the treatment of dialysis patients with bacteremia.
The purpose of this study is to assess the blood cultures' profitability in intensive care unit and create a validated prediction rule for extractioning in critical patients.
Main objective: to observationally assess the efficacy and safety of different antimicrobials in BSI due to ESBL or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in SOT. Secondary objectives: 1. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different antibiotics used for the treatment of infections caused by ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in the SOT population. 2. To compare the efficacy of different antimicrobials between SOT and non-SOT patients (using matched controls from the "non-transplant" INCREMENT cohort). 3. To create a microbiological collection of ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales isolated from the SOT population. 4. To provide data on specific MICs for each antimicrobial evaluated. 5. To provide data on the prevalence of specific mechanisms of resistance and their clinical impact in the particular setting of SOT. 6. To organise an international consortium capable of developing high quality prospective cohort studies and randomised clinical trials in the area of MDR and XDR Enterobacterales in SOT.
In the US and Europe, bacteremia are ranked the 7th leading cause of death from all causes. E. coli is one of the main microorganism involved, responsible for 30% to 45% of bacteremia. In Europe, bacteremia E. coli, including BLSE phenotype, have a strong impact on public health, causing increased mortality, particularly in the elderly, and an increase in the average hospital stay. However, few studies have specifically concerned with the criteria associated with mortality of elderly patients with BLSE E. coli bacteremia. Finally, improving epidemiological knowledge of the elderly patients with bacteremia due to BLSE E. coli has importance in terms of public health and is a prerequisite to the development of preventive strategies and to improve the short-term prognosis.
The continuous increase in the bacterial resistance rate and the slow arrival of new therapeutic options have turned into an antibiotic crisis. One of the strategies proposed by stewardship programs to try to change this situation described worldwide is the use of antibiotics with the lowest possible antimicrobial spectrum. Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia is a good example of how this strategy would be applied. The empirical treatment of nosocomial bacteremia by Enterobacteriaceae comprises in several cases one or two antibiotics with antipseudomonal activity, being much less common than desirable a subsequent change to narrower spectrum antibiotics based on susceptibility data ("de escalation"). This is because the safety of de escalation is based only on expert advice and some observational studies, so their efficacy and safety is questioned by many clinicians and therefore its use is lower than desired. In fact, a recent systematic review of the Cochrane Library concluded that randomized studies to support this practice are needed. Investigators propose a "real clinical practice-based" randomized trial to compare the efficacy and safety of continuing with an antipseudomonal agents vs. de-escalation according to a pre-specified rule, in patients with bacteraemia due to Enterobacteriaceae.
Catheter infections and dysfunctions are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in haemodialysis patients. According to the US Renal Data System, infection is the second leading cause of death in dialysis patients and the leading cause of catheter removal and morbidity in patients with end-stage renal disease. There is evidence that catheter lock solutions containing taurolidine reduce the risk of catheter related infections and improve catheter patency. Lock solutions have a local, but no systemic effect. In this study a taurolidine based lock regimen (TauroLock™-Hep500, Tauropharm, Waldbüttelbrunn, Germany, 2x/week and TauroLock™-U25.000, Tauropharm, Waldbüttelbrunn, Germany, 1x/ week) will be compared to 4% citrate (CitraFlow™ 4%, MedXL, Montreal, Canada, 3x/week) as standard lock solution. The objective of this study is to evaluate if a TauroLock™ based regimen to lock tunneled haemodialysis catheters has reducing effects on catheter related blood stream infections and catheter dysfunctions.