View clinical trials related to Bacteremia.
Filter by:Staphylococcus aureus is the most frequent cause of both healthcare-associated and community-acquired bloodstream infections worldwide. Infective endocarditis (IE) has been detected in 5-17% of cases and is a determinant of poor prognosis. The investigators developed a score (the VIRSTA score) based on patients' characteristics to rule out IE with high confidence (negative predictive value (NPV) above 99%) in patients with SAB. This score, with a cut-off of 3 has been externally validated by two international studies which have also established its high NPV. The 2023 European society of cardiology (ESC) guidelines state that echocardiography should be considered in all patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) using risk scores (including VIRSTA score) to guide the use or not of echocardiography. While recommended, the investigators think that VIRSTA score must be evaluated in terms of patients' outcome.
Some rare cases of recurrent Campylobacter bacteraemia (RCB) exist with relapses months to years after an effective treatment and a negativation of all bacterial samples. As of today, only around 20 cases have been described in the international literature for the last 30 years. The cases are likely highly underreported. No study describes those recurrent Campylobacter bacteraemias at the scale of a country. The aim of this multicentre, nationwide, retrospective study is to describe their precise epidemiology in France for the last 25 years, the immune profile of the patients, the specificities of the bacteria involved, the treatments received and the evolution of these infections. The perspective is to propose a standardization of the medical care of those patients mainly by describing the effective treatments and the explorations of the immune system which should be considered.
Bacteremia is defined as the presence of bacteria in the blood. They can potentially lead to life-threatening septic shock. Effective probabilistic antibiotic therapy must therefore be initiated immediately after blood cultures have been taken. To diagnose bacteremia, blood culture bottles must first be incubated, which allows bacterial growth and early detection. Then, as soon as the sample is positive, an antibiogram of the incriminated bacterium is carried out by inoculation on MH (Mueller Hinton) medium. This diffusion antibiogram is the reference method and is obtained 24 hours after the vial is positive, i.e. around 48 hours after blood cultures are taken. American recommendations agree that it is crucial to use rapid diagnostic tests to obtain the antibiogram. Antibiotic susceptibility test data can be used to broaden the spectrum of antibiotics in the event of ineffective therapy. They can also be used to reduce the spectrum of broad-spectrum antibiotics. This is part of the proper use of antibiotics and the reduction of multi-resistant bacteria (MRB) or highly resistant bacteria (HRB). Finally, it is also possible to carry out an early oral relay, thus avoiding intravenous infusions and their complications, and potentially reducing hospitalization times. The investigators have evaluated a rapid antibiogram by diffusion on MHR-SIR (Mueller-Hinton Rapid-SIR) medium from the blood culture bottle. The investigators were able to obtain antibiogram results 7 hours after blood culture positivity, with excellent correlation compared with the standard method after 24 hours incubation on MH (Mueller-Hinton). The antibiotics tested were the same as with the standard method. Secondly, The investigators were able to evaluate prospectively the impact of diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing on MHR-SIR medium on early modification of antibiotic therapy in bacteremia, on 167 patients Antibiotic susceptibility test data on MHR-SIR enabled us to adapt antibiotic therapy 8 hours after blood culture positivity for 74 patients (44%). Antibiotic therapy was ineffective for 30 patients (18%) and was therefore extended. It also enabled us to reduce the spectrum of antibiotic therapy, in particular through early oral relay, for 44 patients (26%). The aim of this multicenter trial is to validate on a large scale this strategy for obtaining rapid antibiotic susceptibility test results, with significant consequences in terms of optimizing antibiotic therapy.
Patients with hematological malignancies receive highly myelotoxic chemotherapy regimens that cause periods of severe myelosuppression, which places them at high risk of developing bacteremia. At a global level, a very significant increase in multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative microorganisms, particularly Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and MDR P.aeruginosa, have been described during the last decade. Among the strategies to reduce bacterial resistance, ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) as a "carbapenem-sparing" antibiotic has been proposed. C/T has broad-spectrum activity since it has action against ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae and MDR P. aeruginosa. Studies carried out in the real world using this antibiotic in patients with hematological malignancies have demonstrated clinical success in reports and case series, considered a therapeutic option in patients with Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa infections, particularly in MDR pathogens. At the National Cancer Institute (in Spanish, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia), Gram-negative bacilli have been identified for more than 20 years as the pathogens most frequently associated with bacteremia. Escherichia coli occupies the first place in 25% (41% ESBL), followed by Klebsiella spp. in 5.6% (11.2% ESBL) and P. aeruginosa in 5.6% (11.2% MDR). The protocol for approaching and treating hematological malignancy patients with severe neutropenia and fever is to initiate an antimicrobial regimen with piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T). In patients who persist with fever after 48 to 72 hours of starting antibiotics, who present with clinical deterioration, or in whom P/T-resistant bacteria are identified, this is escalated to carbapenem. Therefore, it is proposed to compare the clinical and microbiological response in patients with hematological malignancies who present with severe neutropenia and fever and who present clinical data of bacteremia, with empirical treatment with C/T vs. P/T, trying to reduce the use of carbapenems in this group of patients.
Although controversy exists regarding the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis for patients at risk of infective endocarditis, expert committees continue to publish recommendations for antibiotic prophylactic regimens. The last American Heart Association (AHA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines include several important changes, highlighting that clindamycin (CLI) is no longer recommended as an alternative to amoxicillin in those allergic to penicillin. This new project aims to evaluate the effectiveness of oral doxycycline in preventing post-dental extraction bloodstream infection.
Ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam combination (CAZAVI + ATM) presents a potential alternative for the treatment of metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-type carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) bacteremia, particularly where Cefiderocol is not readily available. This study proposes a Target Trial Emulation (TTE) to assess the efficacy and safety of CAZAVI + ATM compared to other active antibiotics (OAAs) in patients with MBL-type CPE bacteremia, and also to evaluate all-cause 30-day mortality, resistance profiles of isolated microorganisms, clinical failure rates, leukocyte count normalization, adverse events, occurrence of Clostridium difficile infection, and emergence of new multidrug-resistant microorganisms. The study expects to enroll at least 662 patients from 22 hospitals in Argentina. Data will be collected through the REDCap database, with rigorous verification for completeness and accuracy. The outcomes of this project will contribute vital insights into the efficacy and safety of CAZAVI + ATM, informing clinical practice guidelines for the management of MBL-type bacteremia across diverse settings.
Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates with an incidence disproportionately higher in vulnerable populations. Management according to evidence-based care parameters, in particular Infectious Diseases (ID) consultation, is associated with improved mortality. SAB management is suboptimal in Alberta compared to other jurisdictions. An Alberta-based pilot study confirmed that timely recommendations to optimize SAB care, including ID consultation, was associated with improved adherence to all evidence-based quality-of-care indicators. Leveraging this pilot work, the investigators aim to implement OPTIMUS-SAB, an enhanced model of the pilot, to optimize and standardize SAB management across Alberta. The implementation study will be a zone-based acute care site stepped wedge design. OPTIMUS-SAB will consist of a centralized SAB care team whom will receive automated notification of all blood cultures positive for S. aureus allowing them to review the patient's medical chart and make preliminary management recommendations according to an evidence-based care bundle. The investigators will evaluate adherence to evidence-based SAB quality-of-care indicators before and after OPTIMUS-SAB implementation and expect this to improve with a resultant reduction in duration of bacteremia, length of stay, readmission rates, and mortality. In turn, this will translate into cost savings for the health care system.
The Early Intravenous to Oral Antibiotic Switch in Uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteraemia (EVOS) study is a multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel group, phase 3, non-inferiority trial of early intravenous to oral antibiotic switch in comparison with standard intravenous antibiotic regime among patients with uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB). The study is based on the hypothesis that an early switch from IV to oral antimicrobial therapy is non-inferior and safe compared to conventional minimum 14-day course of IV therapy in patients with low-risk uncomplicated SAB.
The contamination rate for blood cultures is high in pediatrics, due to different sampling techniques and the difficulty of sampling small-weight children, thus favoring contamination of the devices at the time of sampling. It is also more difficult to distinguish contamination from true bacteremia in children at an early stage, notably due to the limited number of vials that can be taken at any one time. On a daily basis, clinicians are faced with the choice of whether or not to initiate probabilistic antibiotic therapy when faced with the result of a positive blood culture, particularly when identification is not yet available, but only direct examination. Contamination has major consequences for patient management. Studies in adults have shown that contamination increases hospital length of stay by 4 to 5 days, laboratory costs by +20% and recourse to intravenous antibiotic therapy by +39%. In children, studies came to the same conclusion, with greater prescription of antibiotics, particularly intravenous antibiotics, in patients with contaminated blood cultures than in patients with sterile blood cultures. It also showed that 26% of patients with contaminated blood cultures were initially hospitalized because of the positivity of this test. The aim of this research is to determine the factors associated with contamination, in order to create a predictive score that would help clinicians in their decision-making when receiving the blood culture result as "positive".
The goal of this study is to create a computer simulation of patients with bloodstream infection to understand how changes in healthcare policies and resources affect patient treatment. This simulation will help doctors and health-care decision makers make better choices in treating these patients and avoid overusing antibiotics that can lead to antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic resistance is when bacteria can't be killed by antibiotics anymore. Participants will not receive treatments as this is an observational study, but the study will involve: - Interviews with healthcare staff to understand patient care pathways. - Analysis of historical data on bacteria causing infections and antibiotic treatments. - A 30-day observational study to observe patient treatment for bloodstream infections.