Atrophied Posterior Maxilla Clinical Trial
Official title:
One-stage Maxillary Sinus Elevation Using a Bone Core Containing an Implant From the Mandibular Symphysis: (A Randomized Controlled Trial)
Two groups of patients with atrophy in posterior maxilla indicated for sinus lift.
First group will be subjected to open sinus lift with chin bone graft. Second group will be
subjected to sinus floor elevation using a bone ring.
| Status | Recruiting |
| Enrollment | 30 |
| Est. completion date | August 1, 2019 |
| Est. primary completion date | August 1, 2019 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | N/A and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with at least a unilateral atrophied posterior maxilla indicated for open sinus lift and graft. 2. All ages and both sexes were included in this study. 3. Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect normal healing of bone, and predictable outcome. 4. Patients with good general condition allowing surgical procedure under general anesthesia. 5. Patients with physical and psychological tolerance. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with high risk systemic diseases like uncontrolled diabetes. As uncontrolled diabetes has a negative impact on normal bone healing. 2. Patients with chronic sinusitis, maxillary sinus tumor or cyst. As they will affect accuracy of the procedure. 3. Patients with physical and psychological intolerance. As psychological stress will affect the immune system and patient's fitness including healing capacity. ] |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Egypt | Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine-Cairo University. | Cairo | Giza |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Cairo University |
Egypt,
Mahesh L, Kurtzman GM, Shukla S. Trephine core: an alternative sinus lift technique. J Oral Implantol. 2014 Jul;40 Spec No:391-6. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-14-00047. Epub 2014 Mar 12. — View Citation
Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):216-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2 — View Citation
Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):328-43. Review. — View Citation
Wang PD, Klein S, Kaufman E. One-stage maxillary sinus elevation using a bone core containing a preosseointegrated implant from the mandibular symphysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Oct;22(5):435-9. — View Citation
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Survival rate of implant | The estimated annual failure rate will be assessed via clinical assessment, measuring unit (Binary yes\ no) | One year post-operative. | |
| Secondary | Marginal bone loss around implant | Bone loss around implant will be assessed using Cone Beam Computed Tomography, measuring unit (millimeter). | one year post operative | |
| Secondary | Pain intensity | Intensity of pain will be assessed using Visual analog scale (0 -10), 0 indicate no pain,10 indicate unbearable pain. | One month post-operative. | |
| Secondary | Sinus membrane perforation | Perforation of sinus lining will be assessed clinically, (Binary yes\no). | During operation | |
| Secondary | Established bone integration | Structural and functional integration of bone around implant will be assessed using a device with measuring unit scale of 1-100. | Six months post operative. |