ICE Based Atrial Flutter Ablation Vs Conventional Fluoroscopy/Anatomical Mapping Based Ablation - ICE Flutter Study

Atrial Flutter Clinical Trial

Official title:

Prospective Comparison of ICE Based Atrial Flutter Ablation Vs Conventional Fluoroscopy/Anatomical Mapping Based Ablation

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05229848
• Other study ID #: KCHRF-ICE Flutter-0010
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: February 2022
• Est. completion date: April 2022

Study information

• Verified date: December 2021
• Source: Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation
• Contact: Donita Atkins
• Phone: 8166511969
• Email: datkins[@]kchrf.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), has been an essential component of Radiofrequency (RF) ablations for AF given its association with decreased fluoroscopy time and complication rates, and therefore it is logical that this can be applied to CTI ablations for AFL as well. There are however no studies to date that directly focused on the benefits of adding ICE during CTI dependent AFL ablation. Currently it is not required that operators use ICE in every case of AFL ablation. Investigators intended to study the routine use of ICE in such cases and to see if there is a significant benefit in routine use of ICE.

Description:

Atrial flutter (AFL) is a re-entrant tachyarrhythmia that involves the atria that leads to both rapid ventricular rates as well as a loss of effective contractility of the atrial making them vulnerable to formation of thrombi similar to atrial fibrillation (AF). Incidence rates ranges between 5/100,000 in those <50 years old to 587/100,000 in subjects older than

80. AFL often coexists or precedes AF. In a longitudinal study, 56% of patients with lone AFL eventually developed AF. A variety of atrial flutters have been described apart from the classic cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) dependent flutters. These include left atrial flutters and scar based reentry flutters. Atrial flutter is often a persistent rhythm that requires electrical cardioversion or radiofrequency catheter ablation for termination. While AFL may recur after cardioversion with or without antiarrhythmic therapy, ablation offers a more curative approach for this rather intolerant arrhythmia.

3D electroanatomical mapping in combination with fluoroscopy has been traditionally used in conventional CTI ablation for AFL. However, there are instances when ablation of the CTI is challenging as a result of various factors including a thick Eustachian ridge, presence of a sub-Eustachian pouch, or prominent pectinate muscles. Isthmus anatomy has been shown to affect the parameters of ablation procedure. 3D mapping to overcome difficult anatomy may not be the answer for difficult situations as shown by some operators . These anatomical challenges can not only lengthen procedural times but also lead to increased risk of complications such as perforation, effusion, or cardiac tamponade. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), has been an essential component of Radiofrequency (RF) ablations for AF given its association with decreased fluoroscopy time and complication rates, and therefore it is logical that this can be applied to CTI ablations for AFL as well. There are however no studies to date that directly focused on the benefits of adding ICE during CTI dependent AFL ablation. Currently it is not required that operators use ICE in every case of AFL ablation. Investigators intend to study the routine use of ICE in such cases and to see if there is a significant benefit in routine use of ICE.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 60
• Est. completion date: April 2022
• Est. primary completion date: April 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

All patients undergoing typical CTI dependent AFL who give informed consent for participation in the study will be included.

Exclusion criteria:

• Patients in whom placement of an ICE catheter in the right atrium for adequate atrial visualization is technically not feasible.

• Patients who cannot give an informed consent will be excluded.

• Patients in who vascular access for the 11F sheath is not feasible will be excluded. Those with left iliac vein stenosis or left groin arteriovenous (AV) fistulas or prior left groin access complications will be excluded.

• Patients who on the EP (Electrophysiology) study are found to have a left sided arrhythmia needing transseptal access will be excluded.

• Patients who during EP study are found to have atypical flutter pathways including Left Atrial (LA)/Left sided flutter as above, atypical pathways outside of the CTI, and scar based- reentry pathways.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Atrial Flutter

Intervention

Procedure:
• 3D electroanatomical mapping alone guided CTI ablation
3D electroanatomical mapping in combination with fluoroscopy has been traditionally used in conventional CTI ablation for AFL.
• ICE plus 3D electroanatomical mapping guided CTI ablation
ICE imaging catheter is typically introduced through an 11-F hemostatic sheath and positioned under fluoroscopic guidance in the right atrium. After catheter coupling to the imaging platform, imaging frequency is optimized by the operator using adjunctive gain, depth, and focal length controls to define anatomic structures and minimize noise. Imaging is performed at different levels in the right atrium, if needed. Imaging targets included the right atrium, coronary sinus orifice, fossa ovalis, interatrial septum (IAS), tricuspid valve, left atrium, left atrial appendage, orifice of all pulmonary veins, mitral valve, papillary muscles, aortic and pulmonary valve leaflets, right ventricle, RVOT, pericardial space, esophagus, aorta and adjoining left ventricular and right ventricular myocardium.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute	Overland Park	Kansas
United States	Midwest Heart and Vascular Specialists	Overland Park	Kansas
United States	Overland Park Regional Medical Center	Overland Park	Kansas

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (8)

Bun SS, Latcu DG, Marchlinski F, Saoudi N. Atrial flutter: more than just one of a kind. Eur Heart J. 2015 Sep 14;36(35):2356-63. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv118. Epub 2015 Apr 2. Review. — View Citation

Cohen TJ, Ibrahim B, Lazar J, Rosen J, Klein J. Utility of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in electrophysiology: ICEing the CAKE (catheter ablation knowledge enhancement). J Invasive Cardiol. 1999 Jun;11(6):364-8. — View Citation

Da Costa A, Faure E, Thévenin J, Messier M, Bernard S, Abdel K, Robin C, Romeyer C, Isaaz K. Effect of isthmus anatomy and ablation catheter on radiofrequency catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus. Circulation. 2004 Aug 31;110(9):1030-5. Epub 2004 Aug 23. — View Citation

Granada J, Uribe W, Chyou PH, Maassen K, Vierkant R, Smith PN, Hayes J, Eaker E, Vidaillet H. Incidence and predictors of atrial flutter in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Dec;36(7):2242-6. — View Citation

Halligan SC, Gersh BJ, Brown RD Jr, Rosales AG, Munger TM, Shen WK, Hammill SC, Friedman PA. The natural history of lone atrial flutter. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Feb 17;140(4):265-8. — View Citation

January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, Conti JB, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Murray KT, Sacco RL, Stevenson WG, Tchou PJ, Tracy CM, Yancy CW; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):e1-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Mar 28. Review. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):2305-7. — View Citation

Schernthaner C, Haidinger B, Brandt MC, Kraus J, Danmayr F, Hoppe UC, Strohmer B. The influence of cavotricuspid isthmus length on total radiofrequency energy to cure right atrial flutter. Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(3):237-43. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0159. Epub 2015 Aug 25. — View Citation

Sehar N, Mears J, Bisco S, Patel S, Lachman N, Asirvatham SJ. Anatomic guidance for ablation: atrial flutter, fibrillation, and outflow tract ventricular tachycardia. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2010 Aug 10;10(8):339-56. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Procedural duration, fluoroscopy time, and RF time assessment	To assess the procedural duration, fluoroscopy time, and RF time of patients undergoing CTI dependent flutter ablation using ICE catheter along with 3D anatomical plus fluoroscopy imaging guidance compared to the same parameters in patients undergoing CTI dependent flutter ablation using only 3D anatomical plus fluoroscopy imaging guidance alone.	These are all intraprocedural characteristics
Primary	Post procedural complications	To assess the incidence of post procedural complications such as incidence of perforation, pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, and pericarditis.	Post-operative Day#0-7
Primary	Procedural success - Number of patients with bidirectional block (entrance block and exit block) at the end of the procedure.	To assess the procedural success of ablation procedures in terms of achieving bidirectional block.	End of procedure marker of success