Atopic Dermatitis Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Proof-of-concept Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Rilzabrutinib in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis Who Are Inadequate Responders or Intolerant to Topical Corticosteroids
Verified date | June 2024 |
Source | Sanofi |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This was a parallel treatment, Phase 2, double-blind, 2-arm, placebo-controlled study with 2 staggered cohorts (2 arms in each cohort) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rilzabrutinib in adult participants (aged at least 18 years) with moderate-to-severe AD and intolerance or inadequate response to topical corticosteroids (TCS). The total study duration per participant was expected to be approximately 21 weeks, including up to 4 weeks of screening, 16 weeks of on-treatment double-blind period, 1 week of post-treatment follow-up.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 124 |
Est. completion date | June 23, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | June 23, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - AD as defined by the American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria. - History of AD for at least 12 months prior to baseline as determined by the Investigator through patient interview. - Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score = 12 at screening and at baseline. - IGA score = 3 (on the 0 to 4 IGA scale) at baseline. - BSA of AD involvement = 10% at baseline. - Documented inadequate response or intolerance to TCS within 6 months prior to baseline visit - Baseline PP-NRS score for maximum itch intensity =4. - All contraceptive use by men and women should be consistent with local regulations regarding the methods of contraception for those participating in clinical studies. - For optional substudy only: Willingness to have 2 tape strips for comparison of baseline and treatment response. Exclusion Criteria: - Skin comorbidities that may interfere with study assessments such as psoriasis, tinea corporis, lupus erythematosus. - Conditions that may predispose the patient to excessive bleeding. - Any other clinically significant disease, condition, or medical history that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with participant safety, trial evaluations, and/or trial procedures. - Laboratory abnormalities at the screening visit - History of serious infections requiring intravenous therapy with the potential for recurrence (as judged by the Site Investigator and the Sponsor Medical Monitor), with less than 4 weeks interval between resolution of serious infection and first dose of study drug, or currently active moderate to severe infection at Screening (Grade 2 or higher) including active coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). - Live vaccine except Bacille Calmette Guerin-vaccination within 28 days prior to Day 1 or plan to receive one during the trial; Bacille Calmette Guerin-vaccination within 12 months prior to Screening. - COVID-19 vaccine within 14 days prior to Study Day 1. - Refractory nausea and vomiting, malabsorption, external biliary shunt, or significant bowel resection that would preclude adequate rilzabrutinib/placebo absorption. - Initiation of prescription moisturizers (with or without additives such as ceramide, hyaluronic acid, urea, or filaggrin), topical anesthetics or antihistamines during the screening period. - Use of TCS, topical calcineurin (tacrolimus, and/or pimecrolimus) or topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor within 1 week prior to baseline and as concomitant medication. - Use of systemic corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to baseline and as concomitant medication. - Phototherapy for AD or regular use (more than 2 visits per week) of a tanning booth/parlor within 4 weeks prior to baseline or likely to be required as concomitant procedure during the study. - Use of mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclosporine, dapsone, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), Kineret (anakinra), Enbrel (etanercept), or any other immunosuppressant not mentioned in this exclusion criterion within 4 weeks prior to baseline. - Use of infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, abatacept, tocilizumab, certolizumab, secukinumab, IFN-?, JAK inhibitors, dupilumab, and any other biologic or targeted-synthetic disease modifier drug not mentioned in this exclusion criterion or in exclusion criterion, as well as plasmapheresis within 12 weeks prior to baseline. - Use of anti-CD20 drugs such as rituximab, ofatumumab, other long-acting biologics within 6 months prior to baseline (or shorter if there is documented B cell reconstitution for anti-CD20 drugs). - Use of proton pump inhibitor drugs such as omeprazole and esomeprazole within 3 days of baseline (it is acceptable to change participant to H2 receptor blocking drugs prior to baseline). - Concomitant use of known systemic strong-to-moderate inhibitors and inducers of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) within 14 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to baseline. - Previous use of a BTK inhibitor. - Had received any investigational drug (or is currently using an investigational device) within the 30 days before baseline, or at least 5 times the respective elimination half-life time (whichever is longer). - Active TB or a history of incompletely treated TB, Quantiferon positive patients, Clinically significant abnormality consistent with prior/active TB infection based upon chest radiograph with at least posterior-anterior view, Suspected extrapulmonary TB infection, or patients at high risk of contracting TB. The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Investigational Site Number : 1240001 | London | Ontario |
Canada | Investigational Site Number : 1240002 | Markham | Ontario |
Canada | Investigational Site Number : 1240004 | Quebec | |
Canada | Investigational Site Number : 1240008 | Red Deer | Alberta |
Canada | Investigational Site Number : 1240013 | Sudbury | Ontario |
Canada | Investigational Site Number : 1240007 | Toronto | Ontario |
Canada | Investigational Site Number : 1240011 | Toronto | Ontario |
Chile | Investigational Site Number : 1520001 | Santiago | Reg Metropolitana De Santiago |
Chile | Investigational Site Number : 1520002 | Santiago | Reg Metropolitana De Santiago |
Chile | Investigational Site Number : 1520004 | Santiago | Reg Metropolitana De Santiago |
Czechia | Investigational Site Number : 2030004 | Olomouc | |
Czechia | Investigational Site Number : 2030003 | Pardubice | |
Czechia | Investigational Site Number : 2030002 | Plzen | |
Czechia | Investigational Site Number : 2030001 | Praha 6 | |
Germany | Investigational Site Number : 2760001 | Bad Bentheim | |
Germany | Investigational Site Number : 2760002 | Friedrichshafen | |
Netherlands | Investigational Site Number : 5280001 | Utrecht | |
Poland | Investigational Site Number : 6160008 | Chojnice | |
Poland | Investigational Site Number : 6160005 | Gdansk | Pomorskie |
Poland | Investigational Site Number : 6160001 | Lodz | Lódzkie |
Poland | Investigational Site Number : 6160002 | Lodz | |
Poland | Investigational Site Number : 6160004 | Warszawa | |
United States | Orion Clinical Research Site Number : 8400003 | Austin | Texas |
United States | Asthma and Allergy Associates, PC Site Number : 8400008 | Colorado Springs | Colorado |
United States | E.P.I.M.R.D dba Western Sky Research, Inc. Site Number : 8400009 | El Paso | Texas |
United States | DS Research of Kentucky, LLC Site Number : 8400004 | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | Skin Sciences, PLLC Site Number : 8400005 | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | Florida International Research Center Site Number : 8400002 | Miami | Florida |
United States | National Allergy and Asthma Research, LLC. Site Number : 8400007 | North Charleston | South Carolina |
United States | Antelope Valley Clinical Trials Site Number : 8400001 | Northridge | California |
United States | Integrative Skin Care of MS/SKYCRNG Site Number : 8400011 | Ridgeland | Mississippi |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Sanofi |
United States, Canada, Chile, Czechia, Germany, Netherlands, Poland,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score | The EASI index is a validated investigator-administered scoring system used to measure the severity of clinical signs in atopic dermatitis (AD). Four AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation], and lichenification) were each assessed for severity by the investigator or designee on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). In addition, the area of AD involvement were assessed as a percentage by body area of head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 to 6. 0: 0% of body surface area (BSA) involvement with AD; 1: 1-9%; 2: 10-29%; 2: 30-49%; 4: 50-69%; 5: 70-89% and 6: 90-100% of BSA involvement with AD. Total score ranged from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum); higher scores indicated greater severity of AD. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment value. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 At Week 16 | IGA is a static 5-point measure of disease severity based on an overall assessment of the skin lesions on a 5-point scale (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease). Higher score indicated higher severity. | Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-75 (Reduction of EASI Score By =75% From Baseline) At Week 16 | The EASI index is a validated investigator-administered scoring system used to measure the severity of clinical signs in AD. Four AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation], and lichenification) were each assessed for severity by the investigator or designee on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). In addition, the area of AD involvement were assessed as a percentage by body area of head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 to 6. 0: 0% of BSA involvement with AD; 1: 1-9%; 2: 10-29%; 2: 30-49%; 4: 50-69%; 5: 70-89% and 6: 90-100% of BSA involvement with AD. Total score ranged from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum); higher scores indicated greater severity of AD. Participants who achieved EASI-75 were defined as participants with reduction of EASI score by =75% from baseline. | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage Of Participants With Reduction of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) of =4 Points From Baseline at Week 16 | The PP-NRS is a simple assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during a daily recall period. Participants were asked to rate their worst itch on a 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable) NRS by answering the following question: For itch intensity, "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?". The total score on the scale ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse symptoms. A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days is required to calculate the baseline average score. | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 16 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Weekly Average of Daily PP-NRS Reduction =4 From Baseline During The 16-Week Treatment Period | The PP-NRS is a simple assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during a daily recall period. Participants were asked to rate their worst itch on a 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable) NRS by answering the following question: For itch intensity, "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?". The total score on the scale ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse symptoms. A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days is required to calculate the baseline average score. | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 16 | |
Secondary | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 16 In EASI Score | The EASI index is a validated investigator-administered scoring system used to measure the severity of clinical signs in AD. Four AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation], and lichenification) were each assessed for severity by the investigator or designee on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). In addition, the area of AD involvement were assessed as a percentage by body area of head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 to 6. 0: 0% of BSA involvement with AD; 1: 1-9%; 2: 10-29%; 2: 30-49%; 4: 50-69%; 5: 70-89% and 6: 90-100% of BSA involvement with AD. Total score ranged from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum); higher scores indicated greater severity of AD. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment value. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-50/90 (Reduction of EASI Score by =50% or =90% From Baseline) at Week 16 | The EASI index is a validated investigator-administered scoring system used to measure the severity of clinical signs in AD. Four AD disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation], and lichenification) were each assessed for severity by the investigator or designee on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). In addition, the area of AD involvement were assessed as a percentage by body area of head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, and converted to a score of 0 to 6. 0: 0% of BSA involvement with AD; 1: 1-9%; 2: 10-29%; 2: 30-49%; 4: 50-69%; 5: 70-89% and 6: 90-100% of BSA involvement with AD. Total score ranged from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum); higher scores indicated greater severity of AD. Participants who achieved EASI-50/90 were defined as participants with reduction of EASI score by =50% or =90% from baseline respectively. | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 16 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Percent BSA of AD | BSA affected by AD were assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck [10%], trunk including genitalia [30%], upper limbs [20%], lower limbs [40%]) and were reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. Total score ranges from 0% to 100%. The higher score indicates a worse value and a lower score indicates a better value. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment value. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 16 | |
Secondary | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Weekly Average of Daily PP-NRS | The PP-NRS is a simple assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during a daily recall period. Participants were asked to rate their worst itch on a 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable) NRS by answering the following question: For itch intensity, "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?". The total score on the scale ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse symptoms. A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days is required to calculate the baseline average score. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment value. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Weekly Average of Daily PP-NRS | The PP-NRS is a simple assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during a daily recall period. Participants were asked to rate their worst itch on a 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable) NRS by answering the following question: For itch intensity, "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?". The total score on the scale ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse symptoms. A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days is required to calculate the baseline average score. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment value. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA*BSA-50/75/90 (Reduction of IGA*BSA by =50% or 75% or 90% From Baseline) At Week 16 | IGA is a static 5-point measure of disease severity based on an overall assessment of the skin lesions on a 5-point scale (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, 4 = severe disease). Higher score indicated higher severity. Participants who achieved IGA*BSA-50-75-90 were defined as participants with reduction of IGA*BSA by =50% or 75% or 90% from baseline. | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 16 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and Study intervention Discontinuation | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent period. SAE was any AE that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. An AESI was an AE (serious or nonserious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the investigator to the Sponsor was required. | Baseline (Day 1) to 16 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04090229 -
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multiple Ascending Dose Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneously Delivered ASLAN004 in Adults With Moderate-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT03847389 -
Clobetasol Topical Oil for Children With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05388760 -
Tralokinumab Monotherapy for Children With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis - TRAPEDS 1 (TRAlokinumab PEDiatric Trial no. 1)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05530707 -
Evaluation of Acceptability, Skin Barrier Restoration and Balance of Atopic Skin Using Moisturizer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02595073 -
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Desoximetasone (DSXS) With Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05509023 -
Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of ADX-914 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (SIGNAL-AD)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05048056 -
Phase 2 Study of Efficacy and Safety of AK120, in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04598269 -
Study of ATI-1777 in Adult Patients With Moderate or Severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03936335 -
An Observational Retrospective Cohort Study Being Conducted in Women With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT03089476 -
Evaluating Skin Barrier Dysfunction in Infants at High Risk of Atopy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05029895 -
A Study to Evaluate Adverse Events and Change in Disease State of Oral Upadacitinib in Adolescent Participants Ages 12 to <18 Years Old Diagnosed With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
|
||
Terminated |
NCT03654755 -
Study to Evaluate Long-Term Safety of ASN002 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04556461 -
Effects of Tralokinumab Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis on Skin Barrier Function
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04818138 -
BROadband vs Narrowband photoTherapy for Eczema Trial Nested in the CACTI Cohort
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03719742 -
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Baby Cleanser and a Moisturizer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05375955 -
A Study to Learn About The Study Medicine (PF-07038124) In Patients With Mild To Moderate Atopic Dermatitis Or Mild To Severe Plaque Psoriasis.
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03441568 -
In-home Use Test of the New Modified Diprobase Formulation to Assess the Safety and Tolerability in Infants and Children Under Physician's Control
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06366932 -
Optimization of Atopic Dermatitis Treatment That Requires Second-line Systemic Therapy Through Predictive Models
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03304470 -
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ATx201 in Subjects With Moderate Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04146363 -
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Lebrikizumab (LY3650150) in Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (ADvocate1)
|
Phase 3 |