Atopic Dermatitis Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream Followed by a Long-Term Safety Extension Period in Children (Ages≥ 2 Years to < 12 Years) With Atopic Dermatitis ((TRuE-AD3)
Verified date | June 2024 |
Source | Incyte Corporation |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream in children with Atopic Dermatitis. This is a randomized, double-blind, Vehicle Controlled study. Participants will be randomized 2:2:1 to blinded treatment with ruxolitinib cream 0.75% ,1.5% , or vehicle cream, with stratification by baseline IGA score and age. At Week 8, efficacy will be evaluated. Participants who complete Week 8 assessments with no additional safety concerns will continue into the 44-week Long Term Safety (LTS) period with the same treatment regimen, except those initially randomized to vehicle cream will be rerandomized (1:1) in a blinded manner to 1 of the 2 active treatment groups (ruxolitinib cream 0.75% or 1.5%).
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 330 |
Est. completion date | April 8, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | May 10, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 2 Years to 11 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Participants diagnosed with Atopic Dermatitis (AD) as defined by the Hanifin and Rajka criteria. - Participants with AD duration of at least 3 months (participant/parent/guardian may verbally report signs and symptoms of AD with onset at least 3 months prior). - Participants with IGA score of 2 to 3 at the screening and baseline visits. - Participants with %BSA (excluding scalp) of AD involvement of 3% to 20% at screening and baseline visits. - For children aged 6 years to < 12 years, baseline itch NRS score = 4. - Participants/guardians who agree to discontinue all agents used by the participant to treat AD from the screening visit through the final safety follow-up visit. - Participants with at least 1 target lesion that measures at least 5 cm2 at the screening and baseline visits. The target lesion must be representative of the participant's disease state but not located on the hands, feet, or genitalia. - Willingness to avoid pregnancy or fathering a child for the duration of study participation. Exclusion Criteria: - An unstable course of AD (spontaneously improving or rapidly deteriorating) as determined by the investigator over the previous 4 weeks before the baseline visit. - Concurrent conditions and history of other diseases as follows: 1. Immunocompromised 2. Chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, antiprotozoals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before the baseline visit. 3. Active acute bacterial, fungal, or viral skin infection within 1 week before the baseline visit. 4. Any other concomitant skin disorder, pigmentation, or extensive scarring that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the evaluation of AD lesions or compromise participant safety. 5. Presence of AD lesions only on the hands or feet without prior history of involvement of other classic areas of involvement such as the face or the flexural folds. 6. Other types of eczema. 7. Chronic asthma requiring more than 880 µg of inhaled budesonide or equivalent high dose of other inhaled corticosteroids. - Any serious illness or medical, physical, or psychiatric condition(s) that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with full participation in the study, including administration of study drug and attending required study visits; pose a significant risk to the participant; or interfere with interpretation of study data. - Use of any of the following treatments within the indicated washout period before the baseline visit: 1. 5 half-lives or 12 weeks, whichever is longer - biologic agents (eg, dupilumab). 2. 4 weeks - systemic corticosteroids or adrenocorticotropic hormone analogues, cyclosporin, methotrexate, azathioprine, or other systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulating agents (eg, mycophenolate or tacrolimus). 3. 2 weeks - immunizations with activated vaccines; sedating antihistamines unless on a long-term stable regimen (nonsedating antihistamines are permitted). Note: Live vaccines are not recommended during the VC period. 4. 1 week - use of topical treatments for AD (other than bland emollients, eg, Aveeno® creams, ointments, sprays, soap substitutes), such as corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, PDE4 inhibitors, coal tar (shampoo), topical antibiotics, or antibacterial cleansing body wash/soap. Note: Diluted sodium hypochlorite "bleach" baths are allowed as long as they do not exceed 2 baths per week. - Participants who have previously received JAK inhibitors, systemic or topical. -Ultraviolet light therapy or prolonged exposure to natural or artificial sources of UV radiation (eg, sunlight or tanning booth) within 2 weeks prior to the baseline visit and/or intention to have such exposure during the study, which is thought by the investigator to potentially impact the participant's AD.- - Positive serology test results at screening for HIV antibody. - Current treatment or treatment within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) before the baseline visit with another investigational medication or current enrollment in another investigational drug protocol. - In the opinion of the investigator, unable or unlikely to comply with the administration schedule and study evaluations. - Employees of the sponsor or investigator or otherwise dependents of them. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Dermatology Research Institute | Calgary | Alberta |
Canada | Leader Research | Hamilton | Ontario |
Canada | Dermatology Ottawa Research Centre | Ottawa | Ontario |
United States | Arlington Research Center | Arlington | Texas |
United States | Skindc Clinic | Arlington | Virginia |
United States | Delricht Clinical Research-Clinedge-Ppds Baton Rouge | Baton Rouge | Louisiana |
United States | Meridian Clinical Research | Baton Rouge | Louisiana |
United States | Clinical Research Center of Alabama | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | Pi Coor Clinical Research Llc | Burke | Virginia |
United States | Coastal Pediatric Associates | Charleston | South Carolina |
United States | Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina |
United States | Northwestern Memorial Hospital-Arkes Pavilion | Chicago | Illinois |
United States | Dermatology Specialists Research Indiana | Clarksville | Indiana |
United States | Phdermatology | Clearwater | Florida |
United States | Ohio Pediatric Research Association | Dayton | Ohio |
United States | Henry Ford Medical Center-New Center One | Detroit | Michigan |
United States | Intermountain Clinical Research Icr Draper | Draper | Utah |
United States | First Oc Dermatology | Fountain Valley | California |
United States | Physicians Research Group Ii | Gilbert | Arizona |
United States | Velocity Clinical Research Grants Pass Clinical Research Institute of Southern Oregon Pc | Grants Pass | Oregon |
United States | Cyn3Rgy Research-Clinedge-Ppds | Gresham | Oregon |
United States | Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center | Hershey | Pennsylvania |
United States | Cahaba Dermatology | Hoover | Alabama |
United States | Burke Pharmaceutical Research | Hot Springs National Park | Arkansas |
United States | Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group Llc | Indianapolis | Indiana |
United States | Kansas City Dermatology P.A. | Lenexa | Kansas |
United States | Dermatology Research Associates | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Iact Health | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Metropolis Dermatology | Los Angeles | California |
United States | University of Southern California | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Madera Family Medical Group | Madera | California |
United States | Life Clinical Trials Margate | Margate | Florida |
United States | Velocity Clinical Research-Medford | Medford | Oregon |
United States | Acevedo Clinical Research | Miami | Florida |
United States | Ciocca Dermatology Pa | Miami | Florida |
United States | Entrust Clinical Research | Miami | Florida |
United States | Pediatric Center of Excellence Pce Miami Pediatric Endocrinology, Llc | Miami | Florida |
United States | The Childrens Skin Center Csc Miami | Miami | Florida |
United States | Children'S Hospital of Wisconsin | Milwaukee | Wisconsin |
United States | Allergy & Asthma Associates of Southern California | Mission Viejo | California |
United States | International Clinical Research Tennessee Llc | Murfreesboro | Tennessee |
United States | Delricht Research-Touro Medical Center | New Orleans | Louisiana |
United States | Dr Bobby Buka, Md Greenwich Village | New York | New York |
United States | New York University Langone Medical Center-Fink Children'S Ambulatory Care Center | New York | New York |
United States | Office of Michael W. Simon, Md | Nicholasville | Kentucky |
United States | Sneeze Wheeze and Itch Associates Llc | Normal | Illinois |
United States | Skin Specialists Pc the Advanced Skin Research Center | Omaha | Nebraska |
United States | Palmtree Clinical Research-Clinedge-Ppds | Palm Springs | California |
United States | Knight Cancer Institute At Oregon Health and Science University | Portland | Oregon |
United States | Oregon Dermatology and Research Center | Portland | Oregon |
United States | Rhode Island Hospital | Providence | Rhode Island |
United States | Clinical Research Partners Llc | Richmond | Virginia |
United States | Integrated Research of Inland, Inc | Riverside | California |
United States | Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota |
United States | Lawrence J. Green, Md. Llc | Rockville | Maryland |
United States | Progressive Clinical Research | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Texas Dermatology Alamo Heights Office | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Clinical Science Institute Clinical Research Specialists Inc | Santa Monica | California |
United States | Aeroallergy Research Lab of Savannah | Savannah | Georgia |
United States | Cct Research With Center For Dermatology and Plastic Surgery | Scottsdale | Arizona |
United States | Northshore Medical Group Dermatology Skokie | Skokie | Illinois |
United States | Dermatology Specialists of Spokane | Spokane | Washington |
United States | Springville Dermatology | Springville | Utah |
United States | Forcare Clinical Research | Tampa | Florida |
United States | Allergy and Asthma Care of Waco, Pa | Waco | Texas |
United States | Michigan Dermatology Institute | Waterford | Michigan |
United States | Jordan Valley Dermatology Center | West Jordan | Utah |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Incyte Corporation |
United States, Canada,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Investigator's Global Assessment - Treatment Success (IGA-TS) at Week 8 | The IGA is an overall eczema severity rating on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, and oozing/crusting. The IGA-TS is defined as an IGA score of 0 (clear skin) or 1 (almost clear skin) with =2 grade improvement from Baseline. | Baseline to Week 8 | |
Secondary | VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a =4-Point Improvement in Itch Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 8 | The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants were asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting the number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. | Baseline to Week 8 | |
Secondary | VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a =4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Day 7 (Week 1) | The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants were asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting the number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. | Baseline to Day 7 (Week 1) | |
Secondary | VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a =4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Day 3 | The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants were asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting the number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. | Baseline to Day 3 | |
Secondary | VC Period: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it was considered drug related. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study cream. A TEAE is defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug until the end of the safety follow-up. | from Baseline up to Week 8 | |
Secondary | LTS Period: Number of Participants With Any TEAE | An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it was considered drug related. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study cream. A TEAE is defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug until the end of the safety follow-up. | from the first dose date in the LTS Period (Week 8) until the last follow-up visit (up to 52 weeks) | |
Secondary | VC Period: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE | A TEAE is defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug until the end of the safety follow-up. The severity of AEs will be assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 Grades 1 through 5. The investigator made an assessment of intensity for each AE and SAE reported during the study and assigned it to 1 of the following categories: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated; Grade 5: fatal. | from Baseline up to Week 8 | |
Secondary | LTS Period: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE | A TEAE is defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug until the end of the safety follow-up. The severity of AEs will be assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 Grades 1 through 5. The investigator made an assessment of intensity for each AE and SAE reported during the study and assigned it to 1 of the following categories: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated; Grade 5: fatal. | From Week 12 up to Week 56 | |
Secondary | VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA-TS at Weeks 2 and 4 | The IGA is an overall eczema severity rating on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, and oozing/crusting. The IGA-TS is defined as an IGA score of 0 (clear skin) or 1 (almost clear skin) with =2 grade improvement from Baseline. | Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 | |
Secondary | VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a =4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Week 2 and 4 | The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants were asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. | Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 | |
Secondary | VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 | The EASI scoring system examines 4 areas of the body (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs) and weights them for participants of =8 years of age. Each of the 4 body regions is assessed separately for erythema (E), induration/papulation/edema (I), excoriations (Ex), and lichenification (l), each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72; the severity strata are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1 to 1.0 = almost clear; 1.1 to 7.0 = mild; 7.1 to 21.0 = moderate; 21.1 to 50.0 = severe; 50.1 to 72.0 = very severe. An EASI75 responder was defined as a participant achieving 75% or greater improvement from Baseline in EASI score. | Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, and 8 | |
Secondary | VC Period: Time to Achieve Itch NRS Score Improvement of at Least 2 or 4 Points | The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall), of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants are asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best describes their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. Kaplan-Meier estimation method was used for analyses. | up to Week 8 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05018806 -
Proof of Concept Study of Rilzabrutinib in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04090229 -
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multiple Ascending Dose Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneously Delivered ASLAN004 in Adults With Moderate-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT03847389 -
Clobetasol Topical Oil for Children With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05388760 -
Tralokinumab Monotherapy for Children With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis - TRAPEDS 1 (TRAlokinumab PEDiatric Trial no. 1)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05530707 -
Evaluation of Acceptability, Skin Barrier Restoration and Balance of Atopic Skin Using Moisturizer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02595073 -
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Desoximetasone (DSXS) With Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05509023 -
Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of ADX-914 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (SIGNAL-AD)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05048056 -
Phase 2 Study of Efficacy and Safety of AK120, in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04598269 -
Study of ATI-1777 in Adult Patients With Moderate or Severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03936335 -
An Observational Retrospective Cohort Study Being Conducted in Women With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT03089476 -
Evaluating Skin Barrier Dysfunction in Infants at High Risk of Atopy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05029895 -
A Study to Evaluate Adverse Events and Change in Disease State of Oral Upadacitinib in Adolescent Participants Ages 12 to <18 Years Old Diagnosed With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
|
||
Terminated |
NCT03654755 -
Study to Evaluate Long-Term Safety of ASN002 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04556461 -
Effects of Tralokinumab Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis on Skin Barrier Function
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04818138 -
BROadband vs Narrowband photoTherapy for Eczema Trial Nested in the CACTI Cohort
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03719742 -
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Baby Cleanser and a Moisturizer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05375955 -
A Study to Learn About The Study Medicine (PF-07038124) In Patients With Mild To Moderate Atopic Dermatitis Or Mild To Severe Plaque Psoriasis.
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03441568 -
In-home Use Test of the New Modified Diprobase Formulation to Assess the Safety and Tolerability in Infants and Children Under Physician's Control
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06366932 -
Optimization of Atopic Dermatitis Treatment That Requires Second-line Systemic Therapy Through Predictive Models
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03304470 -
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ATx201 in Subjects With Moderate Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 |