Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03733301
Other study ID # 17100
Secondary ID I4V-MC-JAIY2018-
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date November 16, 2018
Est. completion date August 22, 2019

Study information

Verified date September 2019
Source Eli Lilly and Company
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 329
Est. completion date August 22, 2019
Est. primary completion date July 29, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Have been diagnosed with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis for at least 12 months.

- Have had inadequate response to existing topical (applied to the skin) medications within 6 months preceding screening.

- Are willing to discontinue certain treatments for eczema (such as systemic and topical treatments during a washout period).

- Agree to use emollients daily.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Are currently experiencing or have a history of other concomitant skin conditions (e.g., psoriasis or lupus erythematosus), or a history of erythrodermic, refractory, or unstable skin disease that requires frequent hospitalizations and/or intravenous treatment for skin infections.

- A history of eczema herpeticum within 12 months, and/or a history of 2 or more episodes of eczema herpeticum in the past.

- Participants who are currently experiencing a skin infection that requires treatment, or is currently being treated, with topical or systemic antibiotics.

- Have any serious illness that is anticipated to require the use of systemic corticosteroids or otherwise interfere with study participation or require active frequent monitoring (e.g., unstable chronic asthma).

- Have been treated with the following therapies:

- Monoclonal antibody for less than 5 half-lives prior to randomization.

- Received prior treatment with any oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor less than 4 weeks prior to randomization.

- Received any parenteral corticosteroids administered by intramuscular or intravenous (IV) injection within 6 weeks prior to planned randomization or are anticipated to require parenteral injection of corticosteroids during the study.

- Have had an intra-articular corticosteroid injection within 6 weeks prior to planned randomization.

- Have high blood pressure characterized by a repeated systolic blood pressure >160 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) or diastolic blood pressure >100 mm Hg.

- Have had major surgery within the past eight weeks or are planning major surgery during the study.

- Have experienced any of the following within 12 weeks of screening: venous thromboembolic event (VTE), myocardial infarction (MI), unstable ischemic heart disease, stroke, or New York Heart Association Stage III/IV heart failure.

- Have a history of recurrent (=2) VTE or are considered at high risk of VTE as deemed by the investigator.

- Have a history or presence of cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, chronic liver disease gastrointestinal, endocrine, hematological, neurological, lymphoproliferative disease or neuropsychiatric disorders or any other serious and/or unstable illness.

- Have a current or recent clinically serious viral, bacterial, fungal, or parasitic infection including herpes zoster, tuberculosis.

- Have specific laboratory abnormalities.

- Have received certain treatments that are contraindicated.

- Pregnant or breastfeeding.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Baricitinib
Administered orally.
Topical corticosteroid
Administered as standard-of-care.
Placebo
Administered orally.

Locations

Country Name City State
Argentina Centro de Investigaciones Metabólicas (CINME) - Comite Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Argentina Fundacion CIDEA Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Argentina Instituto de Neumonología y Dermatología Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Argentina Psoriahue Medicina Interdisciplinaria Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Argentina Parra Dermatología Mendoza
Australia Clinical Trials SA Pty Ltd Adelaide South Australia
Australia The Skin Centre Benowa Queensland
Australia Skin and Cancer Foundation Inc. Melbourne Victoria
Australia Fremantle Dermatology Perth Western Australia
Australia Woden Dermatology Phillip Australian Capital Territory
Australia Skin & Cancer Foundation Australia Westmead New South Wales
Australia Veracity Clinical Research Pty Ltd Woolloongabba Queensland
Austria Universitätsklinikum Graz Graz Steiermark
Germany Universitätsklinikum Aachen - UKA Aachen Nordrhein-Westfalen
Germany Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin
Germany Dermatologisches Zentrum Osnabrück Nord Bramsche Niedersachsen
Germany Rosenpark Research Geschäftsbereich der Rosenparkklinik GmbH Darmstadt Hessen
Germany Universitaetsklinikum Essen Essen Nordrhein-Westfalen
Germany TFS Trial Form Support GmbH Hamburg
Germany Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg Heidelberg Baden-Württemberg
Germany Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Schleswig-Holstein
Germany Klinikum der Universität München München Bayern
Germany Universitätsklinikum Münster Münster Nordrhein-Westfalen
Italy Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedale San Martino di Genova Genova
Italy Azienda Ospedaliera - Universitaria Pisana Pisa
Italy Policlinico Univ. Agostino Gemelli Roma Lazio
Italy Istituto Clinico Humanitas Rozzano Milano
Italy ULSS 8 UOC Dermatologia Viale Rodolfi, 37 Vicenza
Japan Iidabashi Clinic Chiyoda-ku Tokyo
Japan Tokyo Teishin Hospital Chiyoda-Ku Tokyo
Japan Hosono Clinic Chuo-ku Tokyo
Japan Yamano Dermatological Clinic Dazaifu Fukuoka
Japan JA Shizuoka Kohseiren Enshu Hospital Hamamatsu-shi Shizuoka
Japan Kawashima Dermatology Clinic Ichikawa-shi Chiba
Japan Tashiro Dermatological Clinic Iizuka-city Fukuoka
Japan Medical Corporation Soleil Miyata Dermatology Clinic Matsudo-shi Chiba
Japan Oizumi Hanawa Clinic Nerima-ku Tokyo
Japan Yoshioka Dermatology Clinic Neyagawa-shi Osaka
Japan Queen's Square Dermatology and Allergology Nishi-ku, Yokohama-city Kanagawa
Japan Sapporo Skin Clinic Sapporo Hokkaido
Japan Shibaki Dermatology Clinic Sapporo Hokkaido
Japan Yamate Dermatological Clinic Shinjuku Tokyo
Japan Tachikawa Dermatology Clinic Tachikawa-shi Tokyo
Japan Shirasaki Clinic Takaoka-shi Toyama
Japan Senri-Chuo Hanafusa Dermatology Clinic Toyonaka-shi Osaka
Korea, Republic of Korea University Ansan Hospital Ansan-si Gyeonggi-do
Korea, Republic of Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital Goyang Gyeonggi-do
Korea, Republic of Gachon University Gil Medical Center Incheon Korea
Korea, Republic of Chungang University Hospital Seoul
Korea, Republic of Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital Seoul
Korea, Republic of Konkuk University Hospital Seoul
Korea, Republic of Seoul St. Mary's Hospital Seoul
Korea, Republic of Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System Seoul
Poland Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o. Lodz
Poland Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne Swidnik
Poland Centrum Medyczne AMED Warszawa
Poland Centrum Medyczne Evimed Warszawa
Spain Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Barcelona
Spain Hospital del Mar Barcelona
Spain Hospital Reina Sofia Cordoba
Spain Hospital De Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal Madrid
Taiwan Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Kaohsiung Kaohsiung
Taiwan Taipei Medical University- Shuang Ho Hospital New Taipei City
Taiwan Chung Shan Medical University Hospital Taichung City
Taiwan Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Taipei Taipei
Taiwan National Taiwan University Hospital Taipei City
Taiwan Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Linkou Taoyuan, (r.o.c.)

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Eli Lilly and Company Incyte Corporation

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Argentina,  Australia,  Austria,  Germany,  Italy,  Japan,  Korea, Republic of,  Poland,  Spain,  Taiwan, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 With a = 2 Point Improvement The IGA measures investigators global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their atopic dermatitis (AD), based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI75 is defined as a = 75% improvement from baseline in the EASI score. Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI90 The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI90 is defined as a = 90% improvement from baseline in the EASI score. Week 16
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline on EASI Score The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe).
Least Squares Mean (LSM) were calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline score and baseline score-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORing Atopic Dermatitis 75 (SCORAD75) The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3)oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with a visual analogue scales (VAS) where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), & subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. The SCORAD75 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a = 75% improvement from baseline in the SCORAD score. Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving a 4-Point Improvement in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) The Itch NRS is a patient-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no itch" and 10 representing "worst itch imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's itching is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in the Score of Item 2 of the Atopic Dermatitis Sleep Scale (ADSS) The ADSS is a 3-item, participant-administered questionnaire developed to assess the impact of itch on sleep including difficulty falling asleep due to itch, frequency of waking due to itch, and difficulty getting back to sleep last night due to itch. Item 2 frequency of waking last night is reported by selecting the number of times they woke up each night, ranging from 0 to 29 times, where the higher a number indicates a worse outcome. The ADSS is designed to be completed daily, using a daily diary, with respondents thinking about sleep "last night." Each item is scored individually. LS Mean were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline score and baseline score-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous effects. Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Skin Pain NRS is a patient-administered,11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "worst pain imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's skin pain is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of skin pain in the past 24 hours. LS Means were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by- visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI50 The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI50 is defined as a = 50% improvement from baseline in the EASI score. Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA of 0 The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in SCORAD The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), & subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease.
LS Means were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by- visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD90 The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3)oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease: (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), & subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. The SCORAD90 is defined as a = 90% improvement from baseline in the SCORAD score. Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected The BSA affected by AD will be assessed for 4 separate body regions and is collected as part of the EASI assessment: head and neck, trunk (including genital region), upper extremities, and lower extremities (including the buttocks). Each body region will be assessed for disease extent ranging from 0% to 100% involvement. The overall total percentage will be reported based off of all 4 body regions combined, after applying specific multipliers to the different body regions to account for the percent of the total BSA represented by each of the 4 regions. Use the percentage of skin affected for each region (0 to 100%) in EASI as follows: BSA Total = 0.1*BSAhead and neck + 0.3*BSAtrunk + 0.2* BSAupper limbs + 0.4*BSAlower limbs.
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Developing Skin Infections Requiring Antibiotic Treatment Percentage of participants developing skin infections requiring antibiotic treatment. Week 16
Secondary Mean Gram Quantity of Moderate Potency Background Topical Corticosteroid (TCS) Used (Tube Weights) Average weights of full tubes were used to determine the dispensed weights for each region. Returned tubes were weighed with cap without carton to determine the amount of TCS in grams (g) used at each visit. Analysis was done via analysis of variance (ANOVA), with geographic region, baseline disease severity (IGA) and treatment as factors in the model. Week 0 through Week 16
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Itch NRS The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale, with 0 representing "no itch" and 10 representing "worst itch imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's itching is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity, visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) The POEM is a 7-item self-assessment questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) on a scale ranging from 0-4 (0 = no days, 1 = 1-2 days, 2 = 3-4 days, 3 = 5-6 days, 4 = everyday). The sum of the 7 items gives the total POEM score of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease). High scores are indicative of more severe disease and poor quality of life.
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Impression of Severity—Atopic Dermatitis (PGI-S-AD) Score The PGI-S-AD is a single-item question asking the participant how they would rate their overall AD symptoms over the past 24 hours, using a daily diary. The 5 categories of responses are "(0) no symptoms", "(1) very mild", "(2) mild" "(3) moderate", and "(4) severe."
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline on the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) The HADS is a participant-rated instrument used to assess both anxiety and depression. This instrument consists of 14 item questionnaire, each item is rated on a 4-point scale, giving maximum scores of 21 for anxiety and depression. Scores of 11 or more on either subscale are considered to be a significant 'case' of psychological morbidity, while scores of 8-10 represent 'borderline' and 0-7, 'normal.'
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) The DLQI is a simple, participant-administered,10 question, validated, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. The recall period of this scale is over the last "week." Response categories include "not at all," "a lot," and "very much," with corresponding scores of 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and at unanswered ("not relevant") responses scored as "0." Scores range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment), and a 4-point change from baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold.
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline on the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Atopic Dermatitis (WPAI-AD) Questionnaire The WPAI-AD participant questionnaire was developed to measure the effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities in the 7 days prior to the visit. The WPAI-AD consists of 6 items grouped in 4 domains: absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and activity impairment, that range from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating greater impairment.
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline on the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score United States and United Kingdom Algorithm The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The first part is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive the health state index scores using the United Kingdom (UK) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.594 to 1, and the United States (US) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.109 to 1, with higher score indicating better health state.
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline on the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The second part is assessed using a VAS that ranged from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 is the worst health you can imagine and 100 is the best health you can imagine.
LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Mean Number of Days Without Use of Background TCS The ANCOVA model includes treatment, region, and baseline disease severity (IGA) as factors. Week 0 through Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA of 0 or 1 With a = 2 Point Improvement The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. Week 4
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05018806 - Proof of Concept Study of Rilzabrutinib in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis Phase 2
Terminated NCT03847389 - Clobetasol Topical Oil for Children With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT04090229 - A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multiple Ascending Dose Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneously Delivered ASLAN004 in Adults With Moderate-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT05388760 - Tralokinumab Monotherapy for Children With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis - TRAPEDS 1 (TRAlokinumab PEDiatric Trial no. 1) Phase 2
Completed NCT05530707 - Evaluation of Acceptability, Skin Barrier Restoration and Balance of Atopic Skin Using Moisturizer N/A
Completed NCT02595073 - Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Desoximetasone (DSXS) With Atopic Dermatitis Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05509023 - Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of ADX-914 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (SIGNAL-AD) Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05048056 - Phase 2 Study of Efficacy and Safety of AK120, in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Phase 2
Completed NCT04598269 - Study of ATI-1777 in Adult Patients With Moderate or Severe Atopic Dermatitis Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03936335 - An Observational Retrospective Cohort Study Being Conducted in Women With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Withdrawn NCT03089476 - Evaluating Skin Barrier Dysfunction in Infants at High Risk of Atopy N/A
Recruiting NCT05029895 - A Study to Evaluate Adverse Events and Change in Disease State of Oral Upadacitinib in Adolescent Participants Ages 12 to <18 Years Old Diagnosed With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Terminated NCT03654755 - Study to Evaluate Long-Term Safety of ASN002 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Phase 2
Completed NCT04556461 - Effects of Tralokinumab Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis on Skin Barrier Function Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04818138 - BROadband vs Narrowband photoTherapy for Eczema Trial Nested in the CACTI Cohort N/A
Completed NCT03719742 - A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Baby Cleanser and a Moisturizer N/A
Completed NCT05375955 - A Study to Learn About The Study Medicine (PF-07038124) In Patients With Mild To Moderate Atopic Dermatitis Or Mild To Severe Plaque Psoriasis. Phase 2
Completed NCT03441568 - In-home Use Test of the New Modified Diprobase Formulation to Assess the Safety and Tolerability in Infants and Children Under Physician's Control N/A
Recruiting NCT06366932 - Optimization of Atopic Dermatitis Treatment That Requires Second-line Systemic Therapy Through Predictive Models Phase 4
Completed NCT03304470 - A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ATx201 in Subjects With Moderate Atopic Dermatitis Phase 2