Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03334422
Other study ID # 16581
Secondary ID I4V-MC-JAHM2017-
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date November 27, 2017
Est. completion date December 12, 2018

Study information

Verified date January 2020
Source Eli Lilly and Company
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib as monotherapy in participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 615
Est. completion date December 12, 2018
Est. primary completion date December 12, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Have been diagnosed with moderate to severe Atopic Dermatitis for at least 12 months.

- Have had inadequate response or intolerance to existing topical (applied to the skin) medications within 6 months preceding screening.

- Are willing to discontinue certain treatments for eczema (such as systemic and topical treatments during a washout period).

- Agree to use emollients daily.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Are currently experiencing or have a history of other concomitant skin conditions (e.g., psoriasis or lupus erythematosus), or a history of erythrodermic, refractory, or unstable skin disease that requires frequent hospitalizations and/or intravenous treatment for skin infections.

- A history of eczema herpeticum within 12 months, and/or a history of 2 or more episode of eczema herpeticum in the past.

- Participants who are currently experiencing a skin infection that requires treatment, or is currently being treated, with topical or systemic antibiotics.

- Have any serious illness that is anticipated to require the use of systemic corticosteroids or otherwise interfere with study participation or require active frequent monitoring (e.g., unstable chronic asthma).

- Have been treated with the following therapies:

- Monoclonal antibody for less than 5 half-lives prior to randomization.

- Received prior treatment with any oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor.

- Received any parenteral corticosteroids administered by intramuscular or intravenous (IV) injection within 2 weeks prior to study entry or within 6 weeks prior to planned randomization or are anticipated to require parenteral injection of corticosteroids during the study.

- Have had an intra-articular corticosteroid injection within 2 weeks prior to study entry or within 6 weeks prior to planned randomization.

- Have high blood pressure characterized by a repeated systolic blood pressure >160 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) or diastolic blood pressure >100 mm Hg.

- Have had major surgery within the past eight weeks or are planning major surgery during the study.

- Have experienced any of the following within 12 weeks of screening: venous thromboembolic event (VTE), myocardial infarction (MI), unstable ischemic heart disease, stroke, or New York Heart Association Stage III/IV heart failure.

- Have a history of recurrent (= 2) VTE or are considered at high risk of VTE as deemed by the investigator.

- Have a history or presence of cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, chronic liver disease gastrointestinal, endocrine, hematological, neurological, lymphoproliferative disease or neuropsychiatric disorders or any other serious and/or unstable illness.

- Have a current or recent clinically serious viral, bacterial, fungal, or parasitic infection including herpes zoster, tuberculosis.

- Have specific laboratory abnormalities.

- Have received certain treatments that are contraindicated.

- Pregnant or breastfeeding.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Baricitinib
Administered orally
Placebo
Administered orally

Locations

Country Name City State
Argentina Fundacion CIDEA Buenos Aires
Argentina Instituto de Neumonología y Dermatología Buenos Aires
Argentina Psoriahue Medicina Interdisciplinaria Buenos Aires
Argentina CENIT Centro de Neurociencias, Investigación y Tratamiento Caba Buenos Aires
Argentina Buenos Aires Skin Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Argentina Centro de Investigaciones Metabólicas (CINME) Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aire Buenos Aires
Argentina Clinica Adventista de Belgrano Ciudad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires
Argentina Parra Dermatología Mendoza
Australia Clinical Trials SA Pty Ltd Adelaide South Australia
Australia Skin and Cancer Foundation Inc. Carlton Victoria
Australia Fremantle Dermatology Perth Western Australia
Australia Woden Dermatology Phillip Australian Capital Territory
Australia Skin & Cancer Foundation Australia Westmead New South Wales
Australia Veracity Clinical Research Pty Ltd Woolloongabba Queensland
Austria Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH - Elisabethinen Linz Oberösterreich
Austria AKH Wien
Austria KA Rudolfstiftung Wien
Austria KH Hietzing mit neurologischem Zentrum Rosenhügel Wien
Austria Sozialmed. Zentrum Ost - Donauspital Wien
Hungary UNO Medical Trials Kft. Budapest
Hungary Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont Borgyogyaszati Klinika Debrecen Hajdu-Bihar
Hungary Kaposi Mor Oktato Korhaz Kaposvar
Hungary Oroshaza Varosi Onkormanyzat Korhaza Oroshaza
Hungary Trial Pharma Kft. Puspokladany Hajdu-Bihar
Hungary SZTE AOK Borgyogyaszati es Allergologiai Klinika Szeged Csongrad
Hungary Allergo-Derm Bakos Kft Szolnok Jasz-Nagykun-Szolnok
Hungary Markusovszky Korhaz Szombathely
Hungary MedMare Bt Veszprem
Israel Haemek Medical Center- Dermatology Afula
Israel Rambam Medical Center Haifa
Israel Hadassah Medical Center - Ein Karem Jerusalem
Israel Rabin Medical Center Petach Tikva
Israel Sheba Medical Center Ramat Gan
Israel Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Tel Aviv
Japan Yanagihara dermatology clinic Ainokawa, Ichikawa-shi Chiba
Japan Tokyo Teishin Hospital Chiyoda-Ku Tokyo
Japan Gifu University Hospital Gifu
Japan Osaka Habikino Medical Center Habikino Osaka
Japan Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center Inashiki-gun Ibaraki
Japan Noguchi Dermatology Kashima-machi, Kamimashiki-gun Kumamoto
Japan Kurume University Hospital Kurume Fukuoka
Japan Yoshioka Dermatology Clinic Neyagawa-shi Osaka
Japan Sanrui Dermatology Clinic Ohmiya-ku,Saitama-shi Saitama
Japan Osaka City University Hospital Osaka
Japan Sapporo Skin Clinic Sapporo Hokkaido
Japan Naoko Dermatology Clinic Setagaya-ku Tokyo
Japan Jichi Medical University Hospital Shimotsuke Tochigi
Japan Yamate Dermatological Clinic Shinjuku Tokyo
Japan Tachikawa Dermatology Clinic Tachikawa-shi Tokyo
Japan Nomura Dermatology Clinic Yokohama-shi Kanagawa
Korea, Republic of Gachon University Gil Medical Center Incheon Korea
Korea, Republic of Chungang University Hospital Seoul
Korea, Republic of Hallym University of Medicine Seoul
Korea, Republic of Konkuk University Hospital Seoul
Korea, Republic of Seoul St. Mary's Hospital Seoul
Korea, Republic of Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System Seoul
Korea, Republic of Ajou University Hospital Suwon Gyeonggi Do
Poland NZOZ Specjalistyczna Przychodnia Dermatologiczna Specderm Bialystok
Poland Centrum Badan Klinicznych, PI House Gdansk
Poland Centrum Medyczne Angelius Provita Katowice
Poland Barbara Rewerska DIAMOND CLINIC Krakow
Poland "Dermed" Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o. Lodz
Poland Miejski Szpital Zespolony w Olsztynie Olsztyn
Poland DermoDent, Centrum Medyczne Czajkowscy Osielsko
Poland LASER CLINIC S.C. Dr Tomasz Kochanowski, Dr Andrzej Krolicki Szczecin
Poland Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny Warsaw
Poland Centralny Szpital Kliniczny MSW Warszawa
Spain Hospital General Universitario Alicante Alicante
Spain Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol Barcelona Badalona
Spain Hospital De Fuenlabrada Fuenlabrada Madrid
Spain Hospital Infanta Leonor Madrid
Spain Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Madrid
Spain Hospital Universitario La Paz Madrid
Spain Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos Mostoles Madrid
Spain Clinica Universitaria De Navarra Pamplona Navarra
Spain Centro de Especialidades Mollabao Pontevedra
Switzerland Inselspital Bern Bern
Switzerland HUG-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève Genève
Switzerland CHUV Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois Lausanne Vaud
Switzerland Universitätsspital Zürich Zürich

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Eli Lilly and Company Incyte Corporation

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Argentina,  Australia,  Austria,  Hungary,  Israel,  Japan,  Korea, Republic of,  Poland,  Spain,  Switzerland, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 With a = 2 Point Improvement (Placebo, 2mg and 4mg Baricitinib) The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participants overall severity of their atopic dermatitis (AD), based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. 16 Weeks
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA of 0 or 1 With a = 2 Point Improvement (Placebo, 1mg Baricitinib) The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participants overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. 16 Weeks
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score is obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI75 is defined as a = 75% improvement from baseline in the EASI score. 16 Weeks
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI90 The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100%) and the severity of 4 clinical signs (1) erythema, (2)edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score is obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI90 is defined as a = 90% improvement from baseline in the EASI score. 16 Weeks
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline on EASI Score The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of AD - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs (1) erythema (2)edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score is obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe).
Least Square (LS) Means were calculated using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORing Atopic Dermatitis 75 (SCORAD75) The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable Itching or lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), & subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. The SCORAD75 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a = 75% improvement from baseline in the SCORAD score. 16 Weeks
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving a 4-Point Improvement in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) The Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no itch" and 10 representing "worst itch imaginable." Overall severity of a participants itching is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. 16 Weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in the Score of Item 2 of the Atopic Dermatitis Sleep Scale (ADSS) Atopic Dermatitis Sleep Scale (ADSS) is a 3-item, participant-administered questionnaire developed to assess the impact of itch on sleep including difficulty falling asleep, frequency of waking, and difficulty getting back to sleep last night. Item 2, frequency of waking last night is reported by selecting the number of times they woke up each night, ranging from 0 to 29 times, where the higher a number indicates a worse outcome. The ADSS is designed to be completed daily, using a daily diary, with respondents thinking about sleep "last night." Each item is scored individually.
LS Means were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by- visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Skin Pain NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "worst pain imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's skin pain is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of skin pain in the past 24 hours.
LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI50 The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs (1) erythema, (2)edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI 50 is defined as =50% improvement from baseline in EASI score. 16 Weeks
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA of 0 The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participants overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. 16 Weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in SCORAD The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), & subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. LSMeans was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, & treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects. Baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD90 The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), & subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease.
SCORAD90 defined as a = 90% improvement from baseline in the SCORAD score.
16 Weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected Body surface area affected by AD will be assessed for 4 separate body regions and is collected as part of the EASI assessment: head and neck, trunk (including genital region), upper extremities, and lower extremities (including the buttocks). Each body region will be assessed for disease extent ranging from 0% to 100% involvement. The overall total percentage will be reported based off of all 4 body regions combined, after applying specific multipliers to the different body regions to account for the percent of the total BSA represented by each of the 4 regions.
Use the percentage of skin affected for each region (0 to 100%) in EASI as follows:
BSA Total = 0.1*BSAhead and neck + 0.3*BSAtrunk + 0.2* BSAupper limbs + 0.4*BSAlower limbs.
LSMean were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary Percentage of Participants Developing Skin Infections Requiring Antibiotic Treatment Percentage of participants developing skin infections requiring antibiotic treatment. 16 Weeks
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Itch NRS The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale, with 0 representing "no itch" and 10 representing "worst itch imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's itching is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.
LSMean were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, & treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects. Baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) The POEM is a 7-item self-assessment questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) on a scale ranging from 0-4 (0 = no days, 1 = 1-2 days, 2 = 3-4 days, 3 = 5-6 days, 4 = everyday). The sum of the 7 items gives the total POEM score of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease). High scores are indicative of more severe disease and poor quality of life.
LSMean were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, & treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects. Baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Impression of Severity—Atopic Dermatitis (PGI-S-AD) Score The PGI-S-AD asked the participant to evaluate the severity of the disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale, using a daily diary. The same category labels used in the Physician's Global Assessment were used for the PGI-S-AD, ie, "(0) no symptoms", "(1) very mild", "(2) mild" "(3) moderate", and "(4) severe." LS Means were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) The HADS is a participant-rated instrument used to assess both anxiety and depression. This instrument consists of 14 items questionnaire, each item is rated on a 4-point scale, giving maximum scores of 21 for anxiety and depression. Scores of 11 or more on either subscale are considered to be a significant 'case' of psychological morbidity, while scores of 8-10 represent 'borderline' and 0-7, 'normal.
LSMean were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, & treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects. Baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) The DLQI is a simple, participant-administered, 10 question, validated, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. The recall period of this scale is over the last "week." Response categories include "not at all," "a lot," and "very much," with corresponding scores of 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and unanswered ("not relevant") responses scored as "0." Scores range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment), and a 4-point change from baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold.
LSMean were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, & treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects. Baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline on the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Atopic Dermatitis (WPAI-AD) Questionnaire The WPAI-AD participant questionnaire was developed to measure the effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities in the 7 days prior to the visit. The WPAI-AD consists of 6 items grouped in 4 domains: absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and activity impairment, that range from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating greater impairment. LSMean were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, & treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects. Baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline on the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score United States and United Kingdom Algorithm EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The first part is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive the health state index scores using the United Kingdom (UK) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.594 to 1, and the United States (US) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.109 to 1. A higher score indicates better health state.
LSMean were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, & treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects. Baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline on the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Score (VAS) EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The second part is assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 is the worst health you can imagine and 100 is the best health you can imagine.
LSMean were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, & treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects. Baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects.
Baseline, 16 Weeks
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 With a = 2 Point Improvement The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participants overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. 4 Weeks
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05018806 - Proof of Concept Study of Rilzabrutinib in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis Phase 2
Terminated NCT03847389 - Clobetasol Topical Oil for Children With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT04090229 - A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multiple Ascending Dose Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneously Delivered ASLAN004 in Adults With Moderate-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT05388760 - Tralokinumab Monotherapy for Children With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis - TRAPEDS 1 (TRAlokinumab PEDiatric Trial no. 1) Phase 2
Completed NCT05530707 - Evaluation of Acceptability, Skin Barrier Restoration and Balance of Atopic Skin Using Moisturizer N/A
Completed NCT02595073 - Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Desoximetasone (DSXS) With Atopic Dermatitis Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05509023 - Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of ADX-914 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (SIGNAL-AD) Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05048056 - Phase 2 Study of Efficacy and Safety of AK120, in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Phase 2
Completed NCT04598269 - Study of ATI-1777 in Adult Patients With Moderate or Severe Atopic Dermatitis Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03936335 - An Observational Retrospective Cohort Study Being Conducted in Women With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Withdrawn NCT03089476 - Evaluating Skin Barrier Dysfunction in Infants at High Risk of Atopy N/A
Recruiting NCT05029895 - A Study to Evaluate Adverse Events and Change in Disease State of Oral Upadacitinib in Adolescent Participants Ages 12 to <18 Years Old Diagnosed With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Terminated NCT03654755 - Study to Evaluate Long-Term Safety of ASN002 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Phase 2
Completed NCT04556461 - Effects of Tralokinumab Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis on Skin Barrier Function Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04818138 - BROadband vs Narrowband photoTherapy for Eczema Trial Nested in the CACTI Cohort N/A
Completed NCT03719742 - A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Baby Cleanser and a Moisturizer N/A
Completed NCT05375955 - A Study to Learn About The Study Medicine (PF-07038124) In Patients With Mild To Moderate Atopic Dermatitis Or Mild To Severe Plaque Psoriasis. Phase 2
Completed NCT03441568 - In-home Use Test of the New Modified Diprobase Formulation to Assess the Safety and Tolerability in Infants and Children Under Physician's Control N/A
Recruiting NCT06366932 - Optimization of Atopic Dermatitis Treatment That Requires Second-line Systemic Therapy Through Predictive Models Phase 4
Completed NCT03304470 - A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ATx201 in Subjects With Moderate Atopic Dermatitis Phase 2