Atopic Dermatitis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Dose-ranging Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab in Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis Subjects With Severe Pruritus Receiving Topical Corticosteroids (TCS)
Verified date | October 2019 |
Source | Galderma R&D |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Assess the efficacy of several subcutaneous doses of nemolizumab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) subjects with severe pruritus receiving TCS, who were not adequately controlled with topical treatments.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 226 |
Est. completion date | September 21, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | July 19, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Male or female subjects = 18 years (or legal age when higher) - Chronic AD, that has been present for at least 2 years before the visit - Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score =12 - Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score = 3 - AD involvement = 10% of Body Surface Area (BSA) - Severe pruritus on at least 3 of the last 7 days before the visit - Documented recent history (within 6 months before the visit) of inadequate response to topical medications - Female subjects must fulfill one of the criteria below: - Female subjects of non-childbearing potential - Female subjects of childbearing potential who agree to a true abstinence or to use an effective or highly effective method of contraception throughout the clinical trial and for 120 days after the last study drug administration Exclusion Criteria: - Body weight < 45 kg - subjects with a medical history of asthma requiring hospitalization in the last 12 months before screening visit and/or whose asthma has not been well-controlled during the last 3 months before the screening visit and/or Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) <80% of the predicted value - Cutaneous bacterial or viral infection within 1 week before the screening visit or during the run-in period - Infection requiring treatment with oral or parenteral antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics or antifungals within 1 week before the screening visit or during the run-in period - History of intolerance to low or mid potency TCS or for whom TCS is not advisable |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | Galderma Investigational Site | Benowa | |
Australia | Galderma Investigational Site | Kogarah | |
Australia | Galderma Investigational Site | Melbourne | |
Australia | Galderma Investigational Site | Phillip | |
Canada | Galderma Investigational Site | Calgary | |
Canada | Galderma Investigational Site | Markham | |
Canada | Galderma Investigational Site | Oakville | |
Canada | Galderma Investigational Site | Ottawa | |
Canada | Galderma Investigational Site | Ottawa | |
Canada | Galderma Investigational Site | Peterborough | |
Canada | Galderma Investigational Site | Richmond Hill | |
Canada | Galderma Investigational Site | Sainte-Foy | |
Canada | Galderma Investigational Site | Waterloo | |
France | Galderma Investigational Site | Bordeaux | |
France | Galderma Investigational Site | Lille | |
France | Galderma Investigational Site | Marseille | |
France | Galderma Investigational Site | Nice | |
France | Galderma Investigational Site | Paris | |
France | Galderma Investigational Site | Toulouse | |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Berlin | |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Berlin | |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Darmstadt | |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Erlangen | |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Frankfurt | |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Hamburg | |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Hannöver | |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Heidelberg | |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Langenau | |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Mainz | |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | München | |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Osnabrück | |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Stuttgart | |
Poland | Galderma Investigational Site | Katowice | |
Poland | Galderma Investigational Site | Katowice | |
Poland | Galderma Investigational Site | Kraków | |
Poland | Galderma Investigational Site | Lódz | |
Poland | Galderma Investigational Site | Lublin | |
Poland | Galderma Investigational Site | Warsaw | |
Poland | Galderma Investigational Site | Warsaw | |
Poland | Galderma Investigational Site | Warsaw | |
Poland | Galderma Investigational Site | Wroclaw | |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | Beverly Hills | California |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | Chapel Hill | North Carolina |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | Columbus | Georgia |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | Dallas | Texas |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Darien | Illinois |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Farmington Hills | Michigan |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | Forest Hills | New York |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | Fort Smith | Arkansas |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | Fountain Valley | California |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | Fremont | California |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Johnston | Rhode Island |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | Miami | Florida |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | New Orleans | Louisiana |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | New York | New York |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | New York | New York |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Overland Park | Kansas |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | Richmond | Virginia |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | Rolling Hills Estates | California |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | Sandy Springs | Georgia |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | Santa Ana | California |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | Santa Monica | California |
United States | Galderma Investigational site | Tampa | Florida |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Tampa | Florida |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Waco | Texas |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Galderma R&D |
United States, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Poland,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 24 | EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72.The severity of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification was assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | From Baseline to Week 24 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Achieving Pruritus Categorical Scale (PCS) Success (Defined as a Weekly Prorated Rounded Average PCS =1 [None - Mild]) at Week 24 | The 4-point pruritus categorical scale was provided in their local language for the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus. Overall itching was scored as 0 for absence of pruritus and 3 for severe pruritus (bothersome itching/scratching that disturbs sleep). Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | Week 24 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With an Improvement of Weekly Average Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) =4 at Each Timepoint up to Week 24 | Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | From Week 1 to Week 24 | |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 24 | SCORAD ranges from 0 to 103 and has three components: extent (body surface area [BSA]), signs, and symptoms of AD. The severity of the 6 signs of AD (erythema/darkening, edema/papulation, oozing/crusting, excoriation, lichenification/prurigo and dryness), was assessed, each on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).The component of extent corresponded to the extent of BSA affected by atopic dermatitis.The BSA involvement of AD was assessed for each part of the body (the possible highest score for each region is: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]), and was reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. Participants were also asked to evaluate their symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss (average for the last 3 days/nights), each evaluated on a Visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | Baseline, Week 24 | |
Secondary | Absolute Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 24 | SCORAD ranges from 0 to 103 and has three components: extent (body surface area [BSA]), signs, and symptoms of AD. The severity of the 6 signs of AD (erythema/darkening, edema/papulation, oozing/crusting, excoriation, lichenification/prurigo and dryness), was assessed, each on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).The component of extent corresponded to the extent of BSA affected by atopic dermatitis.The BSA involvement of AD was assessed for each part of the body (the possible highest score for each region is: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]), and was reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. Participants were also asked to evaluate their symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss (average for the last 3 days/nights), each evaluated on a Visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | Baseline, Week 24 | |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 24 | The sleep disturbance NRS is a scale used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to AD. Participants were asked the following questions in their local language: how would you rate your sleep last night?: On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to signs/symptoms of AD' and 10 being 'I cannot sleep at all due to the signs/symptoms of AD'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | Baseline, Week 24 | |
Secondary | Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 24 | The sleep disturbance NRS is a scale used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to AD. Participants were asked the following questions in their local language: how would you rate your sleep last night?: On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to signs/symptoms of AD' and 10 being 'I cannot sleep at all due to the signs/symptoms of AD'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | Baseline, Week 24 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success (Defined as IGA 0 [Clear] or 1 [Almost Clear]) at Each Timepoint up to Week 24 | IGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe) used to evaluate the global severity of AD. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | From Week 1 to Week 24 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)-50 (Defined as Achieving 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score) at Each Visit up to Week 24 | EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72. The severity of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification were assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | From Week 1 to Week 24 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)-75 (Defined as Achieving 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score) at Each Visit up to Week 24 | EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72.The severity of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification were assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | From Week 1 to Week 24 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)-90 (Defined as Achieving 90% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score) at Each Visit up to Week 24 | EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72.The severity of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification were assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | From Week 1 to Week 24 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Achieving Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success (Defined as IGA 0 [Clear] or 1 [Almost Clear]) and a Reduction of =2 Points at Each Visit up to Week 24 | IGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe) used to evaluate the global severity of AD. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | Week 1 to Week 24 | |
Secondary | Percentage Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Each Visit up to Week 24 | EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72.The severity of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification was assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | From Baseline to Week 24 | |
Secondary | Percentage Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of the Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Each Visit up to Week 24 | Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | At baseline and Week 24 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | To evaluate the safety of nemolizumab in participants with moderate-to-severe AD | From screening to Follow-up visit (Week 32)/Early termination visit | |
Secondary | Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of the Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Each Visit up to Week 24 | Pruritus NRS is a scale to be used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | Baseline to Week 24 | |
Secondary | Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of the Average Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Each Visit up to Week 24 | Pruritus NRS is a scale to be used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For average itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | Baseline to Week 24 | |
Secondary | Percentage Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of the Average Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Each Visit up to Week 24 | Pruritus NRS is a scale to be used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For average itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | Baseline to Week 24 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05018806 -
Proof of Concept Study of Rilzabrutinib in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03847389 -
Clobetasol Topical Oil for Children With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04090229 -
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multiple Ascending Dose Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneously Delivered ASLAN004 in Adults With Moderate-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05388760 -
Tralokinumab Monotherapy for Children With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis - TRAPEDS 1 (TRAlokinumab PEDiatric Trial no. 1)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05530707 -
Evaluation of Acceptability, Skin Barrier Restoration and Balance of Atopic Skin Using Moisturizer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02595073 -
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Desoximetasone (DSXS) With Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05509023 -
Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of ADX-914 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (SIGNAL-AD)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05048056 -
Phase 2 Study of Efficacy and Safety of AK120, in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04598269 -
Study of ATI-1777 in Adult Patients With Moderate or Severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03936335 -
An Observational Retrospective Cohort Study Being Conducted in Women With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT03089476 -
Evaluating Skin Barrier Dysfunction in Infants at High Risk of Atopy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05029895 -
A Study to Evaluate Adverse Events and Change in Disease State of Oral Upadacitinib in Adolescent Participants Ages 12 to <18 Years Old Diagnosed With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
|
||
Terminated |
NCT03654755 -
Study to Evaluate Long-Term Safety of ASN002 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04556461 -
Effects of Tralokinumab Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis on Skin Barrier Function
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04818138 -
BROadband vs Narrowband photoTherapy for Eczema Trial Nested in the CACTI Cohort
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03719742 -
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Baby Cleanser and a Moisturizer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05375955 -
A Study to Learn About The Study Medicine (PF-07038124) In Patients With Mild To Moderate Atopic Dermatitis Or Mild To Severe Plaque Psoriasis.
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03441568 -
In-home Use Test of the New Modified Diprobase Formulation to Assess the Safety and Tolerability in Infants and Children Under Physician's Control
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06366932 -
Optimization of Atopic Dermatitis Treatment That Requires Second-line Systemic Therapy Through Predictive Models
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03304470 -
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ATx201 in Subjects With Moderate Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 |