Tolerance and Efficacy of Formulation 609580 20 Versus Formulation 609209 in Children With Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic Dermatitis Clinical Trial

Official title:

Double-Blind Study of Tolerance and Moisturizers Efficacy of Formulation 609580 20 Versus Formulation 609209 in Children With Atopic Dermatitis Under Normal Conditions of Use

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00931411
• Other study ID #: LRP07019
• Secondary ID: CCER 08-09-009
• Status: Terminated
• Phase: N/A
• First received: June 29, 2009
• Last updated: September 18, 2011
• Start date: January 2009
• Est. completion date: July 2009

Study information

• Verified date: September 2011
• Source: Cosmetique Active International
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Canada: Ethics Review Committee
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Atopic dermatitis is one of the most frequent skin diseases. The disease is often worst during winter months when the skin is drier. Mild to moderate cases of atopic dermatitis are often controlled by a moisturizer alone. The use of moisturizers has been shown to have beneficial effects on atopic dermatitis. It can break the dry skin cycle by hydrating the upper layer of the skin which may prevent the recurrence of the disease and can reduce the use of cream or ointment medications such as corticosteroids. Formulation 609580 20 was developed to keep the moisturizing efficacy of formulation 609209 but to improve its tolerance and cosmetic acceptability (easier to apply, nicer texture, etc.). The new formulation contains the same quantity of shea butter and glycerin but in a different excipient (inactive substance) than the commercial product. In addition, vitamin B3 was added to see if it could help in reducing itching.

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of two study products in children with atopic dermatitis. One of the study products (formulation 609580 20) is not commercially available (outside of clinical trials such as this one). The other study product (formulation 609209) has been approved in Canada and is currently available commercially under the trade name Lipikar Baume.

For this study the child will be randomly assigned to one of the following two groups:

• Group 1: 50 children will receive formulation 609209, the commercial formula for 42 days and will receive formulation 609580 20, the new formula, for 14 days.

• Group 2: 50 children will receive formulation 609580 20, the new formula, for 42 days and will receive formulation 609209, the commercial formula, for 14 days.

Description:

A randomized clinical trial performed at five (5) centers (Montreal, Laval, Quebec City, (Quebec); Markham, London (Ontario), Canada). One hundred (100) patients are enrolled in the study. Subjects and parent(s) or guardian are asked to present to the clinic for five (5) visits (Screening, D0, D7, D42, D56). Formulation 609580 20 or 609209 is applied twice a day (morning and evening) to the whole body for a total of 42 days and then there is a crossover between the two formulations.

Efficacy is evaluated at D0, D7 and D42 measured by SCORAD (scoring atopic dermatitis). Tolerance is evaluated by the investigator at D7, D42 and D56. Global efficacy is measured by parents and investigator at D7 and D42. Medical photographs (optional) of lesions are taken with patients consent at D0 and D42. A crossover between the two products occurs at day 42 so that cosmetic acceptability can be compared at D42 and D56. Skin examinations are performed at all visits. A quality of life questionnaire is filled out by the parent(s) at D0 and D42.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Terminated
• Enrollment: 73
• Est. completion date: July 2009
• Est. primary completion date: June 2009
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 3 Years to 12 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• 3-12 years of age

• Suffering from a mild to moderate atopic dermatitis that is amenable to treatment with moisturizer only

• SCORAD (scoring atopic dermatitis) of 10-30 at screening and Day 0

• Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis must meet Hanifin's criteria (at least 3 basic features and at least 3 minor features; please refer to appendix D)

• Atopic dermatitis has been, in the opinion of the investigator, stable for the past 28 days

• Subject with parents able to apply the study product twice a day (each morning and evening) for a 56 days period

• Subject with parents agreeing not to change their child's lifestyle during the study period (including their usual body hygiene product (soap), the number of baths and showers per day, the laundry detergent and fabric softener used to wash the child's clothes)

• Subject with parents agreeing that their child uses only the test product as body emollient on the whole body during the study period

• Subject with parents available to completely follow the study with their child

• Subject with parents able and willing to sign the informed consent form and to comply with the study regulations of this protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

• Subject has another dermatological condition that could interfere with clinical evaluation including infected atopic dermatitis lesions

• Subject has a previous history of allergy to cosmetic products or any ingredients of the tested formulations

• Subject has received any systemic treatment, including PUVA (psoralen ultraviolet A) therapy for atopic dermatitis within 28 days prior to screening

• Subject has received any topical immunomodulators for atopic dermatitis (such as pimecrolimus or tacrolimus) within 14 days of Day 0

• Subject has received phototherapy within 14 days of Day 0

• Subject intends to expose him/herself to the sun during the trial

• Subject has known allergy to any component of tested products

• Subject has used any experimental treatment within 14 days of Day 0

• Subject has used any topical corticosteroid of class I-IV within 14 days of Day 0

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Atopic Dermatitis
• Dermatitis
• Dermatitis, Atopic
• Eczema

Intervention

Other:
• Formulation 609580 20
Moisturizer, applied topically to whole body, twice a day, morning and evening, after bathing.
• Formulation 609209 (Lipikar Baume)
Moisturizer, applied topically to whole body, twice a day, morning and evening, after bathing.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	Innovaderm Research Inc	Laval	Quebec
Canada	The Guenther Dermatology Research Center	London	Ontario
Canada	Lynderm Research	Markham	Ontario
Canada	Innovaderm Research Inc	Montreal	Quebec
Canada	Centre de recherche dermatologique du Québec Métropolitain	Quebec

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Cosmetique Active International	Innovaderm Research Inc.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Mean Percent Change in SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) From Day 0	The efficacy of formulation 609580 20 to provide relief to children with atopic dermatitis compared to formulation 609209 as measured by the changes in SCORAD at Day 7 and Day 42. It measures intensity of erythema/darkening, edema/papulation, oozing/crust, excoriation, lichenfinication/prurigo and dryness on a scale from 0-3 for a total of 18 points. This score is multiplided by 3.5 and added to 1/5 of the affected percent body surface area. The final score is added to the score from a 10-point pruritus visual analog scale (VAS) and a 10-point loss of sleep VAS. Best score is 0, worst is 103.	7 , 42 days	No
Secondary	Change in Mean Global Efficacy (by Investigator).	The efficacy of formulation 609580 20 to provide relief to children with atopic dermatitis compared to formulation 609209 as measured by the global efficacy evaluation scale at Day 7 and Day 42 (by investigator).; 0 = worsening; 1 = No change; 2 = Mild Improvement; 3 = Moderate Improvement; 4 = Good Improvement; 5 = Excellent Improvement	7, 42 Days	No
Secondary	Change in Mean Global Efficacy (by Parent)	The efficacy of formulation 609580 20 to provide relief to children with atopic dermatitis compared to formulation 609209 as measured by the global efficacy evaluation scale at Day 7 and Day 42 (by parent).; 0 = worsening; 1 = No change; 2 = Mild Improvement; 3 = Moderate Improvement; 4 = Good Improvement; 5 = Excellent Improvement	7, 42 days	No
Secondary	Change in Mean Quality of Life	The effect of formulation 609580 20 to improve quality of life compared to formulation 609209 as measured by changes in the quality of life questionnaire score from Day 0 to Day 42. Scale from -46 (worst) to 46 (best).	0, 42 days	No
Secondary	Change in Mean Cosmetic Acceptability Before Crossover	The cosmetic acceptability of formulation 609580 20 compared to formulation 609209 as measured by the total score in the cosmetic acceptability questionnaire during the first 42 prior to the crossover. Scale from 44 (worst) to -44 (best).	0, 42 days	No
Secondary	Change in Mean Cosmetic Acceptability After Crossover	The cosmetic acceptability of formulation 609580 20 compared to formulation 609209 as measured by the total score in the cosmetic acceptability questionnaire during the 2 week period after the crossover. Scale from 44 (worst) to -44 (best). The 14 Days after the crossover is the same as Day 56 in the study.	14 days (Day 42 to Day 56 of the study)	No
Secondary	Change in Tolerance Before Crossover	Tolerance of study products assessed by investigator at Day 7, 42. It was evaluated using the following scale: 1) Very good tolerance: no objective or subjective intolerance during the study; 2) Good tolerance: very occasional symptoms, not resulting in cessation of applications, no objective sign; 3) Average tolerance: repeated symptoms of intolerance, no cessation of application and no objective sign; 4) Poor tolerance: symptoms requiring cessation of application, no objective sign; 5) Very poor tolerance: objective signs of irritative or allergic dermatitis	7, 42 days	Yes
Secondary	Change in Mean Tolerance After Crossover	Tolerance of study products assessed by investigator during the 2 weeks following the crossover (Day 56 of the study): 1) Very good tolerance: no objective or subjective intolerance during the study; 2) Good tolerance: very occasional symptoms, not resulting in cessation of applications, no objective sign; 3) Average tolerance: repeated symptoms of intolerance, no cessation of application and no objective sign; 4) Poor tolerance: symptoms requiring cessation of application, no objective sign; 5) Very poor tolerance: objective signs of irritative or allergic dermatitis	14 Days (Day 42 to Day 56 of the study)	No
Secondary	Preferred Formulation	Number of participants that preferred one formulation over the other. All patients started the study with one cream and crossed over to the other cream at Day 42 for another 14 days. Participants were asked which they prefered.	56 days	No