Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01052545
Other study ID # IIR 09-104
Secondary ID H-24180
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 2011
Est. completion date June 2013

Study information

Verified date February 2019
Source VA Office of Research and Development
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) is a quality, safety, and cost issue, particularly as unnecessary antibiotics lead to emergence of resistant pathogens. The investigators' proposal to bring clinical practice in line with published guidelines has significant potential to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use for ABU in the VA healthcare system, thus improving the quality and safety of veterans' healthcare. The investigators' study will also provide important insights about how to implement and sustain evidence-based clinical practice within VA hospitals.


Description:

Anticipated Impacts on Veterans' Healthcare: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the single most common hospital-acquired infection. However, the majority of cases of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) are really asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU). ABU is not a clinically significant condition, and treatment is unlikely to confer benefit. Overtreatment of ABU is a quality, safety, and cost issue, particularly as unnecessary antibiotics lead to emergence of resistant flora. The proposal to bring clinical practice in line with published guidelines has significant potential to decrease CAUTI and associated inappropriate antibiotic use in VA hospitals. The study will also provide information about how to maximize effectiveness of audit-feedback to achieve guideline adherence in the inpatient VA setting.

Project Background/Rationale: Evidence-based guidelines recommend that providers neither screen for nor treat ABU in most catheterized patients. However, a significant gap between these guidelines and clinical practice has been documented at the investigators' VA hospital and throughout the world. Since many VA patients in both acute care settings and sub-acute care settings, such as intermediate and long-term care, have a legitimate need for a urinary catheter, the issue of overtreatment of catheter-associated ABU is an active problem for the VA.

Project Objectives: The investigators hypothesize that implementing the existing evidence-based guidelines about non-treatment of ABU will dramatically reduce the unnecessary use of antibiotics to treat ABU and the incidence of incorrectly diagnosed CAUTI. The first objective is to improve quality of care concerning ABU in terms of specific clinical outcomes (inappropriate screening for and treatment of ABU) through implementation of an audit-feedback strategy. The investigators also hypothesize that successful implementation of an audit-feedback strategy will result in measurable changes in clinicians' knowledge and attitudes concerning ABU practice guidelines. The second objective is to assess through surveys the effect of the implementation on clinicians' guideline awareness, familiarity, acceptance, and outcome expectancy.

Project Methods: The investigators' guidelines implementation strategy will employ audit-feedback, applied as a post-prescription antimicrobial review based on established guidelines. The study population for the clinical outcomes is all inpatients on certain wards at the intervention site (Houston VA) and the control site (San Antonio VA). The investigators' study population for the audit-feedback intervention and surveys is the health care providers on these wards. The investigators propose a 3-year study. During the first year the investigators will observe the baseline incidence of inappropriate screening for and treatment of ABU at both sites. Blinded monitoring of clinical outcomes will continue during the next 2 years of the study. During the second year, the investigators will distribute the guidelines at both sites. Clinicians at the intervention site will receive individualized feedback, either by telephone or in person, about whether their management of bacteriuria was guideline-compliant. Unit-level feedback will also be provided. During the third year, individualized feedback will cease, but unit-level feedback will continue as this constitutes a sustainable intervention. Clinicians will complete pre/post surveys of awareness, familiarity, acceptance, and outcome expectancy at the intervention site in year 2 and at both sites in year 3. Differences in outcomes between the individualized intervention in year 2 and the group-level intervention in year 3 will help to determine the necessary intensity of intervention for dissemination and implementation in other VA facilities.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 1598
Est. completion date June 2013
Est. primary completion date June 2013
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- For Objective 1 (Clinical Outcomes), all inpatients at the MEDVAMC or STVHCS on the units of interest (medicine or ECL) during the 3 year period of the study will be included in the chart review process.

- For Objective 2, modifying health care provider knowledge and behavior through audit-feedback and surveys, the investigators will attempt to involve all health care providers on rotation at the VA on the targeted wards during the study period.

- The audit-feedback intervention will be applied to the health care providers on the targeted wards who make the decision to treat CAUTI.

Exclusion Criteria:

- For the chart review component, the investigators want to capture all available data about the clinical outcomes during the study period.

- review the inpatient rosters on the wards of interest several times per week to determine how many of the patients have urinary catheters, etc.

- survey as many health care providers as possible who rotate on the wards of interest during the study period.

- the investigators anticipate that all health care providers who work at the VA hospital will be competent to provide or refuse consent to participate.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Behavioral:
Audit-Feedback
Applied as a post-prescription antimicrobial review based on established guidelines.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX Houston Texas

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
VA Office of Research and Development

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (14)

Burns AC, Petersen NJ, Garza A, Arya M, Patterson JE, Naik AD, Trautner BW. Accuracy of a urinary catheter surveillance protocol. Am J Infect Control. 2012 Feb;40(1):55-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 Aug 3. — View Citation

Grigoryan L, Abers MS, Kizilbash QF, Petersen NJ, Trautner BW. A comparison of the microbiologic profile of indwelling versus external urinary catheters. Am J Infect Control. 2014 Jun;42(6):682-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.02.028. — View Citation

Grigoryan L, Naik AD, Horwitz D, Cadena J, Patterson JE, Zoorob R, Trautner BW. Survey finds improvement in cognitive biases that drive overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria after a successful antimicrobial stewardship intervention. Am J Infect Contro — View Citation

Gupta K, Trautner BW. Diagnosis and management of recurrent urinary tract infections in non-pregnant women. BMJ. 2013 May 29;346:f3140. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3140. Review. — View Citation

Kizilbash QF, Petersen NJ, Chen GJ, Naik AD, Trautner BW. Bacteremia and mortality with urinary catheter-associated bacteriuria. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Nov;34(11):1153-9. doi: 10.1086/673456. Epub 2013 Sep 23. — View Citation

Lin E, Bhusal Y, Horwitz D, Shelburne SA 3rd, Trautner BW. Overtreatment of enterococcal bacteriuria. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jan 9;172(1):33-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.565. — View Citation

Naik AD, Skelton F, Amspoker AB, Glasgow RA, Trautner BW. A fast and frugal algorithm to strengthen diagnosis and treatment decisions for catheter-associated bacteriuria. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 28;12(3):e0174415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174415. eCollection — View Citation

Trautner BW, Bhimani RD, Amspoker AB, Hysong SJ, Garza A, Kelly PA, Payne VL, Naik AD. Development and validation of an algorithm to recalibrate mental models and reduce diagnostic errors associated with catheter-associated bacteriuria. BMC Med Inform Dec — View Citation

Trautner BW, Grigoryan L, Petersen NJ, Hysong S, Cadena J, Patterson JE, Naik AD. Effectiveness of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Approach for Urinary Catheter-Associated Asymptomatic Bacteriuria. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul;175(7):1120-7. doi: 10.1001/jamain — View Citation

Trautner BW, Grigoryan L. Approach to a positive urine culture in a patient without urinary symptoms. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014 Mar;28(1):15-31. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Dec 8. Review. — View Citation

Trautner BW, Kelly PA, Petersen N, Hysong S, Kell H, Liao KS, Patterson JE, Naik AD. A hospital-site controlled intervention using audit and feedback to implement guidelines concerning inappropriate treatment of catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuri — View Citation

Trautner BW, Patterson JE, Petersen NJ, Hysong S, Horwitz D, Chen GJ, Grota P, Naik AD. Quality gaps in documenting urinary catheter use and infectious outcomes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;34(8):793-9. doi: 10.1086/671267. Epub 2013 Jun 17. — View Citation

Trautner BW. Asymptomatic bacteriuria: when the treatment is worse than the disease. Nat Rev Urol. 2011 Dec 6;9(2):85-93. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2011.192. Review. — View Citation

Trautner BW. Management of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2010 Feb;23(1):76-82. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328334dda8. Review. — View Citation

* Note: There are 14 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of Cases of ABU That Are Treated Inappropriately With Antibiotics Years 1, 2, & 3
Primary Urine Cultures Ordered Number of urine cultures collected per 1000 catheter-days for each unit three years
Primary Number of Cases of CAUTI Inappropriately Under-treated (no Antibiotics Given) Years 1, 2, & 3
Secondary Number of Days Antibiotics Are Given to Treat ABU one year
Secondary Clinicians' Awareness of and Familiarity With the ABU Guidelines. one year
Secondary Clinicians Acceptance of and Outcome Expectancy From Following the ABU Guidelines The investigators used a previous validated survey to measure this construct, which we termed "risk perception." We asked 5 questions, all exploring whether various patient characteristics (age, type of organism) might increase providers' sense that untreated ASB might be a risk to their patient's health. These questions were scored on a 1-5 scale, from strongly disagree to strongly agree, with 5 being the best answer (compliant with guidelines about ASB treatment), and 1 being the worst answer (least likely to comply with ASB guidelines). Higher scores mean a better answer. Lower scores mean a worse answer. The minimum value was 1, and the maximum value was 5. To create a score for this domain, we added up the score for each of the 5 questions and divided by the number of questions answered (by 5 if all 5 questions were answered; by 4 if only 4 of the 5 questions had been answered; etc). one year
Secondary Number of Catheter-days of Use Per 1000 Patient Bed Days on Each Unit One year
Secondary Patient Level Analysis of Inappropriate Antibiotic Use The investigators looked at the percentage of cases of ASB (asymptomatic bacteriuria) that were inappropriately over-treated with antibiotics, and the percentage of cases of CAUTI (catheter-associated UTI) that were not treated with antibiotics (under-treated). three years
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03235947 - Perioperative Fosfomycin in the Prophylaxis of Urinary Tract Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Phase 4
Completed NCT04289753 - Behavioral Economics Applications to Geriatrics Leveraging EHRs R33 Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05055856 - Asymptomatic Bacteriuria, Hyponatremia and Geri-atric Syndrome N/A
Completed NCT00781339 - Safety and Efficacy Study of NVC-422 on Bacteriuria in Catheterized Patients Phase 2
Completed NCT03554603 - Modified Reporting of Positive Urine Cultures Collected From Long Term Care N/A
Completed NCT04055675 - Urinalysis Results in Healthy Individuals
Recruiting NCT04152369 - "Peri-operative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Patients With Asymptomatic Bacteriuria of Enterobacteriacae ESBL+ Origin" N/A
Recruiting NCT03269604 - Effectiveness of Three Times of Starting Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients With Asymptomatic Bacteriuria. N/A
Recruiting NCT01771432 - Antibiotic Treatment Versus no Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Asymptomatic Bacteriuria N/A
Completed NCT02373085 - Prospective Comparative Study About Treatment of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Kidney Transplant Recipients. N/A
Completed NCT03704389 - Behavioral Economics Applications to Geriatrics Leveraging EHRs N/A
Completed NCT04333602 - Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Early Kidney Transplantation Follow up N/A
Completed NCT03445312 - Safety and Effectiveness of a Laboratory Intervention to Effectively NOT Treat Asymptomatic Bacteriuria
Completed NCT00506025 - Effectiveness of Cranberry Ingestion on Bacterial Adhesion: An Adjunct Study N/A
Recruiting NCT05554081 - Effect of Standardization of Urine Collection Using PEEZY Device as Compared to Clean Peezy for DAB Phase 3
Completed NCT01871753 - The Bacteriuria in Renal Transplantation (BiRT) Study: A Trial Comparing Antibiotics Versus no Treatment in the Prevention of Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Phase 4
Completed NCT01820897 - Efficacy of Fosfomycin-Trometamol in Urinary Tract Infection Prophylaxis After Kidney Transplantation Phase 4