Astigmatism Clinical Trial
Official title:
Quantification of the Visual Benefits of Soft Toric Contact Lenses Compared to Soft Spherical Contact Lenses Over a Range of Refractive Astigmatism
Verified date | May 2022 |
Source | Coopervision, Inc. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The aim of this work is to undertake a range of vision-related measures with soft toric contact lenses soft spherical contact lenses and spectacle lens correction across a range of levels of astigmatism.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 59 |
Est. completion date | June 21, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | June 21, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 40 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Subjects will only be eligible for the study if: 1. They are of legal age between 18 and 40 years. 2. They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent. 3. They are willing and able to follow the protocol. 4. They are current wearers of any soft contact lens (i.e. have worn lenses in the last six months). 5. They have refractive ocular astigmatism between 0.00DC and -1.50DC in one or both eyes. 6. They have a spherical component to their ocular refractive error between 0.00 and - 6.00 DS. 7. They could attain at least 0.10 logMAR distance high contrast visual acuity in one eye with the study lenses within the available power range. 8. They can be fitted satisfactorily with both lens types. 9. They own an acceptable pair of spectacles. 10. They agree not to participate in other clinical research for the duration of this study. Exclusion Criteria: - Subjects will not be eligible to take part in the study if: 1. They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear. 2. They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear. 3. They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment. 4. They have had corneal refractive surgery. 5. They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus. 6. They are pregnant or breastfeeding. 7. They have any ocular abnormality which would, in the opinion of the investigator, normally contraindicate contact lens wear. 8. They have an amblyopic eye, in which case only dominant eye will be assessed for that subject. 9. They have an infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis), any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV) or diabetes. 10. They have a history of severe allergic reaction or anaphylaxis. 11. They have taken part in any other contact lens clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United Kingdom | Eurolens Research | Manchester |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Coopervision, Inc. |
United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Visual Acuity | Visual acuity was assessed using logMAR for each intervention. | Baseline with low contrast VA | |
Primary | Visual Acuity | Visual acuity was assessed using logMAR for each intervention. | After 30 minutes of dispense (Low Contrast VA) | |
Primary | Visual Acuity | Visual acuity was assessed using logMAR for each intervention. | Baseline with High contrast VA | |
Primary | Visual Acuity | Visual acuity was assessed using logMAR for each intervention. | After 30 minutes of dispense (High Contrast VA) | |
Secondary | Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Conjunctival Redness | Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
The assessments done were recorded prior to the first intervention. Here the time frame used is "Entrance" which refers to the time prior to wear of study lens. |
Entrance (Prior to wear of study lens) | |
Secondary | Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Conjunctival Redness | Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
The assessments were done following the removal of the third intervention. Here the time frame used is "Exit" which refers to those measurements taken post-lens/spectacle wear. |
At Exit (After 30 minutes in each of three interventions) | |
Secondary | Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Limbal Redness | Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
The assessments done were recorded prior to the first intervention. Here the time frame used is "Entrance" which refers to the time prior to wear of study lens. |
Entrance (Prior to wear of study lens) | |
Secondary | Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Limbal Redness | Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
The assessments were done following the removal of the third intervention. Here the time frame used is "Exit" which refers to those measurements taken post-lens/spectacle wear. |
At Exit (After 30 minutes in each of three interventions) | |
Secondary | Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Corneal Staining | Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
The assessments done were recorded prior to the first intervention. Here the time frame used is "Entrance" which refers to the time prior to wear of study lens. |
Entrance (Prior to wear of study lens) | |
Secondary | Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Corneal Staining | Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
The assessments were done following the removal of the third intervention. Here the time frame used is "Exit" which refers to those measurements taken post-lens/spectacle wear. |
At Exit (After 30 minutes in each of three interventions) | |
Secondary | Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Conjunctival Staining | Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
The assessments done were recorded prior to the first intervention. Here the time frame used is "Entrance" which refers to the time prior to wear of study lens. |
Entrance (Prior to wear of study lens) | |
Secondary | Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Conjunctival Staining | Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
The assessments were done following the removal of the third intervention. Here the time frame used is "Exit" which refers to those measurements taken post-lens/spectacle wear. |
At Exit (After 30 minutes in each of three interventions) | |
Secondary | Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Papillary Conjunctivitis | Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
The assessments done were recorded prior to the first intervention. Here the time frame used is "Entrance" which refers to the time prior to wear of study lens. |
Entrance (Prior to wear of study lens) | |
Secondary | Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Papillary Conjunctivitis | Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
The assessments were done following the removal of the third intervention. Here the time frame used is "Exit" which refers to those measurements taken post-lens/spectacle wear. |
At Exit (After 30 minutes in each of three interventions) | |
Secondary | Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Corneal Oedema | Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
The assessments done were recorded prior to the first intervention. Here the time frame used is "Entrance" which refers to the time prior to wear of study lens. |
Entrance (Prior to wear of study lens) | |
Secondary | Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Corneal Oedema | Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
The assessments were done following the removal of the third intervention. Here the time frame used is "Exit" which refers to those measurements taken post-lens/spectacle wear. |
At Exit (After 30 minutes in each of three interventions) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04778501 -
PMCF Study on Monofocal Toric IOL (PODEYE TORIC) in Asia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04536571 -
Vision Stability and Preference for Soft Toric vs. Soft Spherical Contact Lenses
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05039112 -
Clinical Comparison of 2 Daily Disposable Toric Soft Contact Lenses
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05611294 -
Contralateral Study of Topography Guided LASIK Versus Small Incision Lenticule Extraction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05633082 -
A Clinical Performance of Two Soft Toric Contact Lenses
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05506553 -
Comparison of Aspheric Toric Intraocular Lenses for Micro-monovision
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05561296 -
Astigmatism Management With Iris-registration Guided Corneal Relaxing Incisions or Toric IOLs During Cataract Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02847169 -
Clinical Performance of Toric Hydrogel Contact Lenses Following One Week of Daily Wear
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02618018 -
Clinical Evaluation of Efficacy and Stability of AT TORBI 709M 4-haptic Toric IOL in Cataract Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02423109 -
Bilateral Dispensing Study of Fanfilcon A Toric Versus Enfilcon A Toric Lenses
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02555098 -
A Bilateral Dispensing Clinical Trial of an Sapphire Lens Against Senofilcon A Toric for Astigmatism Lens
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02550353 -
Changes Between Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02551796 -
Early Changes Among FLEx, LASIK and FS-LASIK
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02248766 -
Clinical Performance of Habitual Wearers of Avaira Toric When Refitted With Clariti Toric Lenses
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01857102 -
Toric Eye Strain and Stability Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01965288 -
Clinical Performance of Biofinity Toric Versus Air Optix for Astigmatism
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02624791 -
Evaluating and Improving Functional Driving Vision of Patients With Astigmatism
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01680354 -
Surgical Correction of Astigmatism
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01207466 -
Evaluation of Two Daily Disposable Contact Lenses for Wearers With Astigmatism
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01211535 -
Subjective Comfort With Multipurpose Care Solutions in Soft Contact Lens Wearers
|
N/A |