Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

OVERVIEW Cataract is a clouding of the crystalline lens which causes vision loss and blindness if untreated. Cataract surgery is the most frequently performed surgical intervention in medicine with an incidence of 880 surgeries per 100.000 population in 2010 amounting to a total number of over 160.000 surgeries per year in the Netherlands.

Approximately 22% of patients with cataract have a substantial pre-existing corneal astigmatism. Toric IOLs provide the opportunity to correct pre-existing astigmatism, offering the patients optimum distance vision without the use of spectacles or contact lenses. Toric IOLs are increasingly used in cataract and refractive surgery.

Since the introduction of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) in the treatment of cataract in patients with pre-existing corneal astigmatism, numerous studies have shown the importance of accurate positioning of the toric IOL to the intended alignment axis. An error of 5º in toric IOL alignment will decrease the anticipated effect by 17% and thus misalignment will decrease the effectiveness of the astigmatism treatment. There are several methods used to align the toric IOL at the intended axis. Most of these use a 3-step ink-marking procedure and are performed manually. Clinical study showed an average error of 5º in toric IOL alignment when using this method.

Two new tools that have recently been introduced to the market are the VERION Measurement Module and VERION Digital Marker. Together, these tools provide integrated digital guidance for alignment of toric IOLs and they have the potential to eliminate the error in horizontal axis marking and the alignment axis marking error. This will lead to an improved visual outcome. So far, there are no published studies using the VERION tools for toric IOL alignment in cataract surgery. Therefore, the investigators will perform this randomized control trial.

MAIN HYPOTHESIS

The investigators hypothesise that cataract surgery with the implantation of a toric IOL, when using the VERION-tools, compared to manual ink-marking, in patients with corneal astigmatism will lead to:

- An increase in accuracy in toric IOL alignment

OBJECTIVES

Primary Objective:

The primary objective of the study is to compare the accuracy in toric IOL alignment when using the VERION-tools for alignment of the toric IOL or the conventional manual ink-marking procedure.

Other hypotheses and objectives are available in the detailed description.


Clinical Trial Description

Extra hypotheses

- A decrease in residual astigmatism

- An improved best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA)

- An improved uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA)

- A decrease in residual refractive astigmatism

- A decrease or comparable complication profile

Secondary Objective:

The secondary objective of the study is to compare residual astigmatism when using the VERION Measurement Module and VERION Digital Marker for alignment of the toric IOL or the conventional manual ink-marking procedure.

Other Secondary Objectives:

The other secondary objectives are to compare:

1. Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA)

2. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA)

3. Residual refractive astigmatism

4. Wavefront aberrations

5. Complication profile ;


Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT02370953
Study type Interventional
Source Maastricht University Medical Center
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date May 2015
Completion date February 2016

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT04778501 - PMCF Study on Monofocal Toric IOL (PODEYE TORIC) in Asia N/A
Completed NCT04536571 - Vision Stability and Preference for Soft Toric vs. Soft Spherical Contact Lenses N/A
Completed NCT05039112 - Clinical Comparison of 2 Daily Disposable Toric Soft Contact Lenses N/A
Completed NCT04613882 - Quantification of the Visual Benefits of Soft Toric Contact Lenses Compared to Soft Spherical Contact Lenses N/A
Recruiting NCT05611294 - Contralateral Study of Topography Guided LASIK Versus Small Incision Lenticule Extraction N/A
Completed NCT05633082 - A Clinical Performance of Two Soft Toric Contact Lenses N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05561296 - Astigmatism Management With Iris-registration Guided Corneal Relaxing Incisions or Toric IOLs During Cataract Surgery N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05506553 - Comparison of Aspheric Toric Intraocular Lenses for Micro-monovision N/A
Completed NCT02847169 - Clinical Performance of Toric Hydrogel Contact Lenses Following One Week of Daily Wear N/A
Recruiting NCT02618018 - Clinical Evaluation of Efficacy and Stability of AT TORBI 709M 4-haptic Toric IOL in Cataract Surgery N/A
Completed NCT02550353 - Changes Between Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis N/A
Completed NCT02551796 - Early Changes Among FLEx, LASIK and FS-LASIK N/A
Completed NCT02423109 - Bilateral Dispensing Study of Fanfilcon A Toric Versus Enfilcon A Toric Lenses N/A
Completed NCT02555098 - A Bilateral Dispensing Clinical Trial of an Sapphire Lens Against Senofilcon A Toric for Astigmatism Lens N/A
Completed NCT02248766 - Clinical Performance of Habitual Wearers of Avaira Toric When Refitted With Clariti Toric Lenses N/A
Completed NCT01857102 - Toric Eye Strain and Stability Study N/A
Completed NCT01965288 - Clinical Performance of Biofinity Toric Versus Air Optix for Astigmatism N/A
Completed NCT02624791 - Evaluating and Improving Functional Driving Vision of Patients With Astigmatism N/A
Withdrawn NCT01680354 - Surgical Correction of Astigmatism N/A
Completed NCT01207466 - Evaluation of Two Daily Disposable Contact Lenses for Wearers With Astigmatism N/A