Astigmatism Clinical Trial
Official title:
To Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the EnVista® One-Piece Hydrophobic Acrylic Toric IOL Designed to Reduce the Effects of Preoperative Corneal Astigmatism on Postoperative Refraction Following Cataract Surgery
NCT number | NCT01852084 |
Other study ID # | 761 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | March 6, 2013 |
Est. completion date | December 2016 |
Verified date | August 2020 |
Source | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The investigational enVista IOL, Model MX60Tis equipped with toric optics and axis marks on the posterior surface to minimize the possibility of surgically induced astigmatism.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 191 |
Est. completion date | December 2016 |
Est. primary completion date | July 18, 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Subjects must have a clinically significant cataract in the study eye that is considered amenable to treatment with standard phacoemulsification cataract extraction. - Subjects must require a lens power from 16.0 D to 27.0 D in the study eye. - Subjects must be willing to discontinue contact lens wear for the duration of the study and, demonstrate stability prior to biometry and surgery in the study eye. - Subjects must have a best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) projected to be better than 20/30 after toric IOL implantation in the study eye. - Subjects must have predicted postoperative corneal astigmatism between 0.90D and 2.40D in the study eye, as determined by the Toric Calculator. - Subjects must have a minimum preoperative corneal astigmatism of 0.90 D in the study eye. - Subjects must have a dilated preoperative pupil size greater than or equal to 5.0 mm in the study eye. Exclusion Criteria: - Subjects who have had previous intraocular or corneal surgery in the study eye. - Subjects with any clinically significant ocular pathology which would be expected to reduce potential BCDVA to 20/30 or worse in the study eye during the course of the study. - Subjects with any anterior segment pathology in the study eye likely to increase the risk of complications from phacoemulsification cataract surgery. - Subjects with associated ocular conditions which could affect the stability of the IOL in the study eye. - Subjects with a traumatic cataract in the study eye. - Subjects with uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye. - Subjects with clinically significant irregular corneal astigmatism in the study eye, as determined by the medical judgment of the Investigator. - Subjects with clinically significant corneal pathology potentially affecting topography of either eye. - Subjects with any ocular condition that could prevent the possibility of a visual outcome better than 20/30 in the study eye. - Subjects with a difference of greater than 0.50D of corneal astigmatism as measured with the IOL Master and the topographer in the study eye using vector analysis. - Subjects with an anterior chamber depth <2mm in the study eye. - Subjects with potential BCDVA of 20/200 or worse in the fellow eye. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Bausch & Lomb | Irvine | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Mean Dioptric Change in Cylinder | Dioptric change in cylinder from the preoperative keratometric cylinder magnitude to postoperative manifest refraction cylinder magnitude (referenced to the corneal plane). | Baseline, Final Visit (scheduled within window: days 120-180) | |
Primary | Percentage of Participants With Intraocular Lens (IOL) Rotation of Less Than or Equal to Five Degrees | Intraocular Lens (IOL) rotation of less than or equal to five degrees between Forms 3 (scheduled within window: days 30-60) and final visit (scheduled within window: days 120-180). | Form 3 Visit (window: days 30-60), Final Visit (window: days 120-180) | |
Primary | Mean Best-corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) at Final Visit | Best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) at Final Visit, expressed as logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Corrected means spectacle corrected. Visual acuity (VA) was reported as letters read correctly, and the letters read were converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) acuity. The participant read rows of letters on a standard LogMAR chart until the participant misses 3 letters on a row with 5 letters. The total number of correct letters were recorded. A decrease in the number of correct letters indicates a decrease in visual acuity. | Final Visit (scheduled within window: days 120-180) | |
Primary | Percentage of Participants With Reduction in Cylinder Within 0.50 Diopter (D) and Within 1.00 D of Intended. | Final Visit (scheduled within window: days 120-180) | ||
Secondary | Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) at Final Visit | Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), expressed as logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Uncorrected means not spectacle-corrected. Visual acuity (VA) was reported as letters read correctly, and the letters read were converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) acuity. The participant read rows of letters on a standard LogMAR chart until the participant misses 3 letters on a row with 5 letters. The total number of correct letters were recorded. A decrease in the number of correct letters indicates a decrease in visual acuity. | Final Visit (scheduled within window: days 120-180) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04778501 -
PMCF Study on Monofocal Toric IOL (PODEYE TORIC) in Asia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04536571 -
Vision Stability and Preference for Soft Toric vs. Soft Spherical Contact Lenses
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04613882 -
Quantification of the Visual Benefits of Soft Toric Contact Lenses Compared to Soft Spherical Contact Lenses
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05039112 -
Clinical Comparison of 2 Daily Disposable Toric Soft Contact Lenses
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05611294 -
Contralateral Study of Topography Guided LASIK Versus Small Incision Lenticule Extraction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05633082 -
A Clinical Performance of Two Soft Toric Contact Lenses
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05561296 -
Astigmatism Management With Iris-registration Guided Corneal Relaxing Incisions or Toric IOLs During Cataract Surgery
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05506553 -
Comparison of Aspheric Toric Intraocular Lenses for Micro-monovision
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02847169 -
Clinical Performance of Toric Hydrogel Contact Lenses Following One Week of Daily Wear
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02618018 -
Clinical Evaluation of Efficacy and Stability of AT TORBI 709M 4-haptic Toric IOL in Cataract Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02550353 -
Changes Between Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02423109 -
Bilateral Dispensing Study of Fanfilcon A Toric Versus Enfilcon A Toric Lenses
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02551796 -
Early Changes Among FLEx, LASIK and FS-LASIK
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02555098 -
A Bilateral Dispensing Clinical Trial of an Sapphire Lens Against Senofilcon A Toric for Astigmatism Lens
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02248766 -
Clinical Performance of Habitual Wearers of Avaira Toric When Refitted With Clariti Toric Lenses
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01857102 -
Toric Eye Strain and Stability Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01965288 -
Clinical Performance of Biofinity Toric Versus Air Optix for Astigmatism
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02624791 -
Evaluating and Improving Functional Driving Vision of Patients With Astigmatism
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01680354 -
Surgical Correction of Astigmatism
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01207466 -
Evaluation of Two Daily Disposable Contact Lenses for Wearers With Astigmatism
|
N/A |