View clinical trials related to Asthma in Children.
Filter by:This is a two-arm, parallel design, randomized, controlled pilot trial comparing access to Asma Guardián, a culturally tailored multi-component app-based asthma intervention for Hispanic/Latinx school age children with asthma, to usual care.
In this study, the investigators hypothesize that the reference product (SalbR/Ventolin) is more effective than SalbG (Salbutamol Sandoz) at improving the lung function in children with asthma, and that this difference increases alongside the severity of the airway resistance. (Null hypothesis: There is no difference). This could be explained by different properties and deposition of the aerosol. Purpose of this research: Rejecting the null hypothesis. This is based on the answers to the questions below. Research questions: 1. Is there a difference between the increase in FEV1 (and FVC) after 100 μg SalbG versus FEV1 after 100 μg SalbR in children aged 4-14 years with insufficient asthma control? (primary question) 2. Is there a difference in the subjective feeling of the children after inhalation with 100 μg SalbR and after 100 μg SalbG, measured with a VAS score? 3. Is the increase in FEV1 (and FVC) in children with asthma between 4-14 years of age with insufficient asthma control after inhalation of 400 μg SalbR different than after inhalation of 400 μg SalbG? 4. Is there a difference in the subjective feeling of the children after inhalation with 400 μg SalbR and after 400 μg SalbG, measured with a VAS score?
This randomized control trial design (RCT) study was conducted on children aged 6 -11 years
In this Study i'll compare the effectiveness of two drugs used in acute exacerbation of asthma by their sideffects, complaince and improvement in the PRAM score. The better one would be adapted in our clinical practice.
The goal of this clinical trial is to study if starting bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP), a mask that gives pressure to the lungs, works well for children in the emergency department with moderate to severe asthma attacks. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Whether initiation of BiPAP at the same time as continuous beta-agonist therapy (e.g., nebulized albuterol) will decrease how long children with moderate to severe asthma attacks need to receive continuous beta-agonist therapy. 2. Whether early BiPAP changes how the lungs function in children with asthma attacks. 3. Whether children receiving early BiPAP experience more issues or side effects than those children who do not. All children will receive the usual treatment for asthma attacks; if they are still experiencing moderate to severe symptoms after the initial treatment, they will be asked to participate in the study. Participants will then wear a mask while they are receiving the continuous beta-agonist therapy. Some patients will receive BiPAP where pressure is given to the lungs and others will have a sham BiPAP mask where no pressure is given to the lungs. Study participants will wear the mask for 4 hours or until their treatment team feels they are ready to come off of the continuous beta-agonist therapy. Participants will receive more medications and decisions on going home or being admitted to the hospital will be decided as usual by their treatment team. Researchers will compare BiPAP versus Control (Sham BiPAP) groups to see if there is a difference in how long continuous beta-agonist therapy is needed, how the lungs are functioning, and number or type of side effects.
The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial of Telehealth-Enhanced Asthma Care for Home After the Emergency Room (TEACH-ER) vs. enhanced care (EC). TEACH-ER includes: 1) brief, pictorial, and health literacy-informed asthma education in the ED, with color- and shape-coded labels provided for home asthma medications; 2) virtual primary care follow-up within 1 week of discharge using in-home telemedicine (Zoom), featuring provider prompts for guideline-based preventive therapy and home delivery of prescribed medications with pictorial action plans; 3) two additional in-home virtual visits to reinforce teaching, review treatment plans, label medications, and support effective management practices. The investigators will enroll 430 children (ages 3-12 yrs) from the two dedicated pediatric EDs in our region, and follow all participants for a 12-month period. The investigators will call caregivers to complete blinded follow-up telephone surveys at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after discharge. The investigators will assess the effectiveness of TEACH-ER in reducing the need for additional asthma-related ED visits or hospitalizations in the 1-months after enrollment. Additional outcomes of interest include asthma symptoms, medication adherence, absenteeism from work and school, quality of life, and the delivery of care consistent with national asthma care guidelines.
The overall aims of this study are to develop and pilot test BRief intervention to Evaluate Asthma THErapy (BREATHE)-Peds, a dyadic shared decision-making intervention, to improve asthma by supporting self-management among racial and ethnic minority early adolescents receiving care for uncontrolled asthma in federally-qualified health centers (FQHCs) in urban communities. Aim 1 (Phase I) involves developing the intervention through focus groups with early adolescents and caregivers. Aims 2 and 3 (Phase II) involve preliminary testing of the intervention through a pilot randomized controlled trial. This record is for Phase II and III only
The goal of this pilot interventional study is to learn about the implementation of a home monitoring program (using remote study visits and lung function testing) in children with asthma. The main questions to answer are: 1. Do participants find the program to be feasibile, acceptable and accessible? 2. What factors are associated with completion of the program? 3. Does the program have an effect on asthma control and daytime sleepiness?
The goal of this pilot study is to investigate if installing an air purifier in the homes of children and young people with asthma improves their asthma outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does installing an air purifier in the homes of children and young people with asthma improve their asthma outcomes - Is the use of an air purifier in the home acceptable to children and young people and their families? Children and young people with asthma attending our clinic will be selected at random to be invited to take part. For those that take part, an air purifier (Rensair Ltd. - Rensair Compact) will be installed in their home for a one-year period. Data will be collected on numbers of asthma attacks, rescue oral steroids, quality of life, symptoms, lung function at the beginning and at three-monthly intervals throughout the study period. The acceptability to children and young people and their families taking part in this study of using an air purifier in their home will also be assessed.
The long-term goal is to implement an evidence-based asthma intervention based on the Center for Disease Control's recommended framework (EXHALE) within Baltimore City Public Schools (BCPS). As part of a stepped wedge pragmatic trial the investigators will: 1. Evaluate the effectiveness of a tailored implementation plan of Asthma CHAMPS in 32 Baltimore city elementary schools to reduce asthma disparities. 2. Conduct a pragmatic trail using a stepped wedge design to evaluate implementation of a school and home asthma intervention program to reduce asthma-related absences, healthcare utilization and exacerbations and improve asthma control, among children enrolled in 32 Baltimore City elementary schools. 3. Use qualitative methods (observation and semi structured interviews) to obtain stakeholder feedback (parents, community health workers, school personnel and administrators) on impact of Asthma CHAMPS, identify potential refinements in intervention and implementation strategies, and evaluate impact of local adaptation and fidelity on implementation success and sustainability.