View clinical trials related to Asthma in Children.
Filter by:This is a prospective, observational clinical cohort study involving 405 children born premature (at less than 37 weeks gestation) and their mother/parent/guardian. The purpose of the study is to investigate how the microbiome (the collection of microbes in a biological site) of children develops over the first years of life and its associations with the risk of childhood health outcomes including allergies and asthma. The study will also examine how perinatal factors associate with patterns of microbiome development, and their effects on the microbiome, metabolome (the collection of metabolites in a biological sample) and immune development of this population in the first years of life.
Despite a strong evidence-base for the efficacy of multilevel programs in reducing asthma symptoms among low-income preschool minority children, gaps remain in our understanding of how to best translate and scale up these efficacious interventions into sustainable programs that reduce known asthma health disparities. Head Start (HS) serves over one million low income children in the US each year by focusing on early learning, physical health, and family engagement. HS is committed to implementing evidence based programs to promote overall child well-being, and is focused on addressing asthma symptoms due to the deleterious impact on school absences and child development. We have demonstrated the effectiveness of a multi-level staff and family education program (ABC Asthma) that significantly reduced asthma symptoms and courses of oral corticosteroids. However, these interventions are not successfully integrated within community organizations for long-term sustainability. It is unknown how to best scale up and implement these evidence based asthma interventions into low resource community organizations that serve children at risk. Implementation strategies are frequently developed atheoretically and may not be tailored to the setting. The overall purpose of this project is to inform best practices of implementation of an asthma education program by 1) systematically evaluating the use of intervention mapping to develop a tailored implementation strategy in partnership with Head Start stakeholders, 2) examining both staff and organizational level determinants associated with implementation of ABC Asthma, and 3) evaluating the success of tailored implementation strategies on implementation outcomes and school absences and other health outcomes. The YMCA of Central Maryland have enthusiastically agreed to implement the Maryland ABC HS Asthma within 40 sites in four communities: Baltimore City, Baltimore County, Anne Arundel County, and Prince George's County.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a technology-enhanced educational intervention for caregivers and children who are hospitalized due to asthma. We will conduct a pilot RCT with 60 children (5-13 yrs) hospitalized with asthma at the Golisano Children's Hospital in Rochester, NY. After baseline assessment, subjects will be randomized to either: 1) the Telehealth Education for Asthma Connecting Hospital and Home (TEACHH) intervention, which includes inpatient child/caregiver education using pictorial materials, color/shape labels for home medications (green star=controller, yellow/red circles=rescue), and a pair of in-home, smartphone-based telehealth visits after discharge to reinforce effective home management; or, 2) the standard care (SC) condition, which features standard inpatient education and routine outpatient follow-up. Patients in TEACHH will also receive all SC measures. All caregivers will complete blinded telephone follow-up assessments at 2, 4, and 6 months after discharge; children will be asked medication questions at baseline and 6 months. We will describe the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the TEACHH intervention by reviewing process measure data collected throughout the study; assess the preliminary efficacy of TEACHH in improving key clinical outcomes, including asthma-related ACU at 7 days, 30 days, and 6 months (per electronic health record documentation) and symptom-free days at each follow-up (reported by caregivers); and assess secondary clinical and functional outcomes including asthma-related quality of life, missed school or work due to asthma, caregiver and child medication knowledge, and reported adherence. We will also invite all caregivers to complete a semi-structured qualitative interview (1 month after baseline for the TEACHH group, 6 months after baseline for the SC group). Findings from this work will establish a strong foundation for a full-scale trial, and guide future efforts to deliver guideline-based asthma care to underserved children and families at the greatest risk for preventable morbidity.
This randomized controlled trial aims to examine the effectiveness of the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based Asthma Management Training Program on the health outcomes of asthmatic children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and their caregivers over a 12-month post-intervention.
Most children with asthma have concurrent atopy (allergic inflammation), which is associated with an improved response to ICS. However, the absence of an atopic phenotype is associated with a poorer ICS response, leaving clinicians with limited treatment options. The nonatopic asthma phenotype has been characterized as the absence of atopic diseases including allergic rhinitis, eczema, or food allergies, and a negative skin prick test to common aeroallergens. Children with mild asthma treated with ICS over 44 weeks without a positive allergen skin test are 3 times more likely to have an asthma exacerbation when compared with children with positive skin tests. Similarly, adolescents and adults with asthma with low blood eosinophils or low sputum eosinophils have no difference in exacerbation rate response to ICS compared with placebo. Due to poor ICS response in nonatopic children and the known adverse effects of ICS, the development of non-steroid treatments options is needed. Monotherapy with the long-acting muscarinic antagonist, tiotropium, was superior to placebo for treatment failure outcomes in adolescents and adults with low sputum eosinophil levels. Tiotropium is approved in children as an add on therapy to ICS in children ≥ 6 years with asthma. But, this combination of treatment would still expose children with nonatopic asthma to the risks (but potentially without the benefit) of ICS therapy. The objective of this study is to conduct a feasibility pilot safety study of 6-weeks treatment with tiotropium monotherapy vs. ICS in children ages 6 to 11 years old with nonatopic mild persistent asthma.
This study is a 24-week, randomized, parallel group comparative effectiveness study to evaluate the risk of stepping down therapy for patients with well-controlled asthma treated with combination Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and Leukotriene receptor antagonist（LTRA).
The main objective of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of patient's learning in self-taking of prescribed asthma maintenance treatments and provided by JOE (a new DTX), on the number of severe exacerbations in children with an asthma graded 2, 3, 4 and 5 according to GINA classification.
This study seeks to reduce exposure to asthmagens in the homes of a community of Latino children residing in an area of intense agricultural production in Eastern Washington by testing the effectiveness of an intervention (high efficiency particulate air filter- HEPA portable room air cleaners) plus asthma education to reduce indoor measures of particulate matter, ammonia, improve clinically relevant measures of asthma health, and reduce biomarkers of inflammation.
Observational, multicenter, study conducted in 12 hospitals in the Nord and Pas-De-Calais departments. The aim of this study is to describe the relationship between reported exposure to molds and asthma control in a pediatric population. Each patient followed by a specialized asthma pediatrician in one of the study center will be proposed to participate in the study. Children aged 1 to < 18 years, with asthma diagnosis, based on the assessment of a specialized physician after a follow-up of at least 6 months Inclusion, non-inclusion and exclusion criteria will be verified by the investigators. The questionnaires will be completed during the consultation, collected by the physician in charge of the consultation and sent to the principal investigator for data entry. Inclusion will take place over a period of 12 consecutive months from the date of obtaining regulatory approval.
This study aims to iteratively develop, refine and test the Improving Asthma Care Together (IMPACT) Intervention for school-age children (7-11 years) with persistent asthma and their parents.