View clinical trials related to Asthma Attack.
Filter by:Aim: To evaluate the use of AeviceMD Monitoring System (AeviceMD) asthma in reducing acute exacerbation. Methodology: Using a randomized controlled trial design, this project aims evaluate the effectiveness of AeviceMD in improving patients' outcomes in terms of reducing exacerbation, healthcare utilization, improving quality of life, self-efficacy, and cost effectiveness. Paediatric patients above age 7 and adults will be recruited. The data follow-up period is 3 months. It will also evaluate the usability of the device from both patients' and clinicians' perspective. 180 patients (124 adults, 56 pediatrics) and 120 clinicians will be recruited. Importance of study: This study will evaluate if the AeviceMD can help improve disease management and reduce recurrence of asthma exacerbation. Potential benefits and risk: AeviceMD allows for remote monitoring and tracking of patients' lung sounds, which could be used by patients to monitor their lung condition and prevent an episode of exacerbation or worsening exacerbations culminating in an admission which who further utilize already limited healthcare resources. An exacerbation is an episode of severe shortness of breath, cough, and chest tightening which warrants a visit to a healthcare institution. Through self-monitoring, patients can be empowered to self-manage their asthma, with aid of the asthma action plan which is given to all patients with asthma. AeviceMD can also help provide clinicians with patients' objective lung data. In the primary care setting, care is also fragmented as patients are often followed-up by a different doctor or healthcare providers. Clinicians have no objective data to track patients, and is dependent on patients' self-report and possible recall bias. There is no expected risk with the use of the device.
The goal of this interventional study is to examine the effect of asthma flare-up clinic follow-up in adult subjects after an asthma flare-up. This study aim to answer the following questions: 1. Does a follow-up in a flare-up clinic improves disease outcomes? 2. Does a follow-up in a flare-up clinic improves disease management? Participants in the intervention group will take part in a structured follow-up at the asthma flare-up clinic at three time points. Each visit will include questionnaires, pulmonologist examination and consultation, laboratory tests and spirometry. The control group will undergo phone-call follow-up with a research coordinator in similar time frames as the intervention. Researchers will compare the two groups to see if the clinic follow-up affects the study outcomes.
The purpose of the study is to gain a deeper understanding of the impact of asthma attacks on the lives of patients who experience them. This will help us to describe the true extent of the impact of asthma attacks on factors of importance to patients which have not previously been well described, including the psychological, social, financial and emotional burden of asthma attacks. Additionally, it is hoped that detailed questioning regarding features of asthma attacks from a patient perspective will improve our understanding of patient recognition of attacks, consistency of certain features of attacks and patient views regarding preventative strategies for attacks. Patient experiences of asthma attacks are poorly described in previous research. Hence this work is expected to provide useful insights into these experiences which will contribute to improvements in detecting, treating and preventing asthma attacks. The study will consist of a one-off interview lasting about 45 minutes with patients who have recently had asthma attacks. We plan to recruit patients for the study from an outpatient clinic for those who have had a recent attack or from a register of patients who have volunteered for future asthma research studies. The interviews will take place in person at the Respiratory Research Unit at the Nottingham City Hospital or over the telephone depending on patient preference.
Objective: To determine the extent to which high-dose (30mg) oral montelukast, added to standard treatment in children with moderate and severe acute exacerbations improves outcomes. Central Hypothesis: High-dose oral montelukast, added to standard treatment in children aged 5 to 17 years with moderate and severe acute asthma exacerbations, rapidly improves lung function, clinical severity, hospitalization rate and 72-hour symptom burden. Secondary Hypotheses: 1. There are greater effects of high-dose oral montelukast on lung function and on the secondary outcomes in the presence of respiratory viral detection or leukotriene-mediated inflammation; and 2. There is an interaction between viral detection and urinary leukotriene 4 level with treatment-response. Design: A two-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial of high-dose oral montelukast versus identical placebo, as add-on to standard treatment, in children aged 5 to 17 years with moderate and severe acute asthma exacerbations. Intervention: High-dose oral montelukast added to standard treatment in comparison with standard treatment as the 2nd treatment-allocation arm. Primary and Important Secondary Endpoints: For the Primary Aim, the primary outcome measure to be compared between arms will be change of %-predicted airway resistance by impulse oscillometry (IOS) at 5Hz (%R5) at 2 hours after treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes will include improvement of %-predicted FEV1 (%FEV1), clinical severity measured using the validated Acute Asthma Intensity Research Score (AAIRS), hospitalization rate, and 72 hour symptom burden using the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Diary (PACD). For the Secondary Aim, the investigators will determine (1) The effects of high-dose oral montelukast on lung function and on our secondary outcomes in the presence of nasal viruses and of greater leukotriene-mediated inflammation; and (2) The degree of interaction between viral detection and urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4) level with treatment-response. Laboratory evaluations: The primary outcome (change of %R5) and select secondary outcomes (%FEV1, AAIRS, LTE4) will be measured before and again at 2 hours after treatment initiation. The other secondary outcomes will be measured at the time of hospitalization decision-making by the clinical team (hospitalization rate) or at 72-hours after treatment initiation (PACD).