View clinical trials related to Asthma Acute.
Filter by:Aim: To evaluate the use of AeviceMD Monitoring System (AeviceMD) asthma in reducing acute exacerbation. Methodology: Using a randomized controlled trial design, this project aims evaluate the effectiveness of AeviceMD in improving patients' outcomes in terms of reducing exacerbation, healthcare utilization, improving quality of life, self-efficacy, and cost effectiveness. Paediatric patients above age 7 and adults will be recruited. The data follow-up period is 3 months. It will also evaluate the usability of the device from both patients' and clinicians' perspective. 180 patients (124 adults, 56 pediatrics) and 120 clinicians will be recruited. Importance of study: This study will evaluate if the AeviceMD can help improve disease management and reduce recurrence of asthma exacerbation. Potential benefits and risk: AeviceMD allows for remote monitoring and tracking of patients' lung sounds, which could be used by patients to monitor their lung condition and prevent an episode of exacerbation or worsening exacerbations culminating in an admission which who further utilize already limited healthcare resources. An exacerbation is an episode of severe shortness of breath, cough, and chest tightening which warrants a visit to a healthcare institution. Through self-monitoring, patients can be empowered to self-manage their asthma, with aid of the asthma action plan which is given to all patients with asthma. AeviceMD can also help provide clinicians with patients' objective lung data. In the primary care setting, care is also fragmented as patients are often followed-up by a different doctor or healthcare providers. Clinicians have no objective data to track patients, and is dependent on patients' self-report and possible recall bias. There is no expected risk with the use of the device.
Study team will obtain a list of all patients who have been seen in A+E over the past 6 years with a discharge diagnosis of asthma. Their history will be reviewed from their A+E notes. Team will obtain weight and height from Electronic prescribing tool and will obtain compliance information and past medical history from participant's GP records. Team will use participant's postcode to word out socio economic status quintile using office of national statistics tool. The following information will be taken from hospital documentation and from GP records.
COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF HYDROCORTISONE AND METHYLPREDNISOLONE IN ACUTE SEVERE ASTHMA In this study Investigator will compare the efficacy of hydrocortisone and methyl prednisolone in acute severe asthma that will lead to final result and beneficial effects that will help in early resoloution of symptoms and help in preventing recurrence
Asthma is a common chronic bronchial disease affecting 300 million people worldwide. The disease can be severe when it is not managed properly or when it is not controlled by treatments. Asthma is characterized by bronchial inflammation, bronchial hyperreactivity and tissue remodeling. Symptoms include episodes of coughing, dyspnoea and wheezing in relation with bronchial obstruction. The evolution is marked by the occurrence of exacerbations (increase of symptoms), most often triggered by viral infections, mostly due to rhinoviruses. The treatment of asthma is based on inhaled corticosteroid therapy sometimes combined with other treatments that help control the majority of asthma. However, about 10% of patients suffer from persistent symptoms despite these treatments. Natural killer (NK) cells are important actors of the antiviral innate immune response and are present in high numbers in the lungs. However, their role in severe asthma and its virus-induced exacerbations is unknown. The purpose of this work is to characterize NK cells in severe asthma in order to identify molecules expressed differently from control subjects. The goal is to assess whether these molecules could be potential biomarkers of a severe asthma subtype, also known as the endotype, and/or be the molecular control for exacerbation. The advantage of identifying biomarkers for inflammatory diseases lies in their usefulness in establishing a correct diagnosis, monitoring the progress of the disease and the effectiveness of treatments. The secondary objectives are to characterize the activation of NK cells in response to in vitro rhinovirus infection of different types, in monoculture or in a model of interaction with a bronchial epithelium, and identify one or more molecules involved in the interaction between bronchial epithelial cells and NK cells.
The study will systematically evaluate how an emergency manual-a collection of checklists and fact sheets-affects the performance of resuscitation teams during the management of priority one patients in an emergency department.
The purpose of this study was to establish the effect on pulse rate, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, pain and anxiety levels of Fowler's and the forward-leaning positions during nebulization in children experiencing asthma attacks.
This study compares two types of noninvasive treatments for asthma attacks with the objective of analyzing the efficacy of each therapy during the period of exacerbations in infants and asthmatics hospitalized.
The primary goal of this proposal is to use an in-home, smartphone-enabled, hand-held spirometer to determine the FEV1% predicted ranges that predict the Yellow Zone threshold.
Acute asthma produces greatly increased work of breathing and increased oxygen requirement secondary to bronchial narrowing and airway obstruction by inflammatory secretions. There is growing evidence that non-invasive ventilation can reverse these processes more efficiently than conventional asthma therapy. Surprisingly, there have not yet been any large scale prospective controlled studies to investigate this hypothesis, (either in adults or children). Consequently, the aim of this study is to determine if the use of non-invasive positive airway pressure, for children admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of asthma, reduces their work of breathing, need for adjunctive medications, and shortens the length of hospital stay, compared to current standard therapy.
Objective: To determine the extent to which high-dose (30mg) oral montelukast, added to standard treatment in children with moderate and severe acute exacerbations improves outcomes. Central Hypothesis: High-dose oral montelukast, added to standard treatment in children aged 5 to 17 years with moderate and severe acute asthma exacerbations, rapidly improves lung function, clinical severity, hospitalization rate and 72-hour symptom burden. Secondary Hypotheses: 1. There are greater effects of high-dose oral montelukast on lung function and on the secondary outcomes in the presence of respiratory viral detection or leukotriene-mediated inflammation; and 2. There is an interaction between viral detection and urinary leukotriene 4 level with treatment-response. Design: A two-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial of high-dose oral montelukast versus identical placebo, as add-on to standard treatment, in children aged 5 to 17 years with moderate and severe acute asthma exacerbations. Intervention: High-dose oral montelukast added to standard treatment in comparison with standard treatment as the 2nd treatment-allocation arm. Primary and Important Secondary Endpoints: For the Primary Aim, the primary outcome measure to be compared between arms will be change of %-predicted airway resistance by impulse oscillometry (IOS) at 5Hz (%R5) at 2 hours after treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes will include improvement of %-predicted FEV1 (%FEV1), clinical severity measured using the validated Acute Asthma Intensity Research Score (AAIRS), hospitalization rate, and 72 hour symptom burden using the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Diary (PACD). For the Secondary Aim, the investigators will determine (1) The effects of high-dose oral montelukast on lung function and on our secondary outcomes in the presence of nasal viruses and of greater leukotriene-mediated inflammation; and (2) The degree of interaction between viral detection and urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4) level with treatment-response. Laboratory evaluations: The primary outcome (change of %R5) and select secondary outcomes (%FEV1, AAIRS, LTE4) will be measured before and again at 2 hours after treatment initiation. The other secondary outcomes will be measured at the time of hospitalization decision-making by the clinical team (hospitalization rate) or at 72-hours after treatment initiation (PACD).