View clinical trials related to Ascites.
Filter by:Cirrhotic patients have a high incidence of abdominal wall hernias. Ascites and sarcopenia are risk factors to development of bigger hernias and frequent need for urgent surgery due parietal complications. However, hernia surgery is usually delayed in cirrhotic patients because of high morbidity and mortality. Methods: A prospective study of cirrhotic patients with abdominal wall hernia during January 2009 to November 2014. Demographics, characteristics of underlying liver disease, type of hernia, complications and mortality of 246 enrolled patients were collected. Elective hernia repair was performed in 57 unselected patients, 186 patients were kept in clinical follow up. During follow up urgent hernia surgery was performed when unavoidable
This is a clinical Study to evaluate the effect, survival benefit and safety of intraperitoneal docetaxel combined with oral S-1 for advanced gastric cancer with malignant ascites.
To compare the efficacy of branched-chain amino acid in serum albumin level in cirrhotic patients with ascites.
Patients with significant ascites and advanced ovarian cancer (AOC), undergoing complex, cytoreductive surgery are at risk of malnutrition, poor quality of life and the risk of hypo- or hypervolemia in a perioperative period. All these factors may cause hemodynamic consequences during anesthesia and surgery, and elevate the risk of morbidity and mortality. The objective of the study is to evaluate, whether slow ascites evacuation for a few days before the surgery for AOC, could 1) influence the hemodynamic consequences of ascites on systemic circulation in patients undergoing surgery, 2) improve patient's quality of life and 3) ability to feed correctly before treatment starts, and thus lower the risk of perioperative morbidity. Eligible patients are those with significant ascites, diagnosed or suspected for AOC, who are scheduled for primary surgery (both upfront cytoreduction or laparoscopic evaluation before neoadjuvant chemotherapy), that cannot be performed within next 7 or more days, for any reason. Patients will be asked to fill in quality of life questionnaire (QLQ). Clinical data, a Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) will be recorded. Patients will be randomized to either intervention arm A - insertion of vascular catheter into abdominal cavity and slow, systematic, daily ascites evacuation, or to observation arm B - standard of care with just observation (acute large volume (>5000ml) paracentesis allowed if needed). Patients in both groups will be encouraged to use oral nutritional support. Randomization will be open, 1:1, for every eligible, consecutive patient. After 7 days patients will be interviewed, asked to fill in QLQ, patient's experience on the treatment survey, a SGA will be recorded. During the first hour of the surgery hemodynamic data from anethetic charts will be recorded along with other clinical data concerning patient's characteristics, surgery details and 30-day postoperative follow-up. A template is provided. The hypothesis of the study is that slow, systematic ascites evacuation few days before surgery for advanced ovarian cancer can facilitate hemodynamic control of systemic circulation of patients undergoing surgery, and improve patients' quality of life, feeding ability before treatment starts. Secondary we would expect lower risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether drainage with the usage of a fine, patient-controlled vascular catheter inserted into abdominal cavity is a feasible, safe and effective method in the management of symptomatic malignant ascites. Complications' rate of the procedure and patients' quality of life, nutritional status and experience on the treatment are main endpoints.
Cirrhosis is the leading cause of death in India and worldwide and leading causes in developed world include alcoholic liver disease, hepatitis C, and more recently, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). As cirrhosis advances, portal hypertension develops, resulting in complications such as ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and variceal hemorrhage. Ascites is the most common major complication of cirrhosis, occurring in 50-60% of patients within ten years of diagnosis . Development of ascites is an ominous landmark in disease progression as 15% of patients with ascites will die within 1 year, and 44% within 5 years. Less than 10% patients develop refractory ascites and is associated with a poor prognosis with a high mortality, approximately 50% within 6 months and 75% at 1 year with the median survival approximately 6 months . Refractory ascites occurs as a result of splanchnic vasodilatation and maximal activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the renin - aldosterone system (RAAS) . The therapeutic options available for these patients are serial therapeutic paracentesis, liver transplantation and trans jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts .The model for end stage liver disease( MELD) score predicts survival in patients with cirrhosis . However, other factors in patients with cirrhosis and ascites are also associated with poor prognosis, including low mean arterial pressure; low serum sodium, low urine sodium, and high Child-Pugh score . Variceal bleed is the most dreaded complication of cirrhosis and screening endoscopic is recommend in these patients. About 60% of patients with decompensated cirrhosis have varices at the time of diagnosis. Majority of these patients will require non selective beta blockers (NSBB) as standard of care as primary or secondary prophylaxis in prevention of variceal hemorrhage. NSBB reduce portal pressure by decreasing cardiac output and by producing splanchnic vasoconstriction.. Endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVL) is another modality of treatment of esophageal varices and meta-analysis showed EVL to be associated with significantly lower incidence of first variceal hemorrhage without differences in mortality compared to NSBB. NSBB also has shown to improve survival in these patients with nonhemodynamic effects. Some of the patients may progress to end stage liver disease characterized by the development of refractory ascites and other complications. Most of the studies of NSBB comparing to EVL for primary/secondary prevention of variceal hemorrhage included patients of predominantly child A/B cirrhosis with variable number with ascites without any mention of ascites grading and some of trials excluded patient's with refractory ascites. These patients with ascites received diuretics and salt restricted diet as standard of care. However none of these studies mentioned about control of ascites and survival benefit in patients with advanced stage (child B and C) cirrhosis with ascites .In recent years the role of NSBB for prevention of variceal hemorrhage in refractory ascites patients has been questioned because of the deleterious effect on survival.However the use of NSBB in end stage liver disease has shown mixed results and controversial. Therefore this study is being planned to know the effects of NSBB in advanced stage liver disease patients with ascites and varices in preventing variceal hemorrhage ,effect on ascites and survival.
This trial studies efficacy and safety of combination of modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with malignant ascites versus standard chemoinfusion (CDDP+5FU).
Multicentre, open, randomised, and controlled trial conducted in patients diagnosed with recurrent/refractory ascites who meet inclusion/exclusion criteria. The efficacy of the Alfapump, TIPS and paracentesis with regard to the treatment of ascites will be compared. All patients will receive medical care for cirrhosis and ascites according to the institution's standards of care. Standard of care may include, but is not limited to the administration of diuretics, paracentesis and consideration for orthotopic liver transplantation.
This protocol represents an open-label pilot study to assess whether oral administration of SBI in subjects with decompensated cirrhosis with ascites can lead improvements in the management of the disease. The impact of SBI therapy will be based on changes to markers of bacterial translocation, gut barrier damage, and inflammation as well as the impact on rates of SIBO. Study subjects will be given one packet of EnteraGam, each packet containing 5.0 g SBI, twice daily for 8 weeks.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of BAX69 monotherapy given either as intraperitoneal (IP) infusion (Single-Route Arm); or as IP infusion after intravenous (IV) infusion (IV+IP) (Double-Route Arm), and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for each Arm separately, in subjects with refractory ovarian cancer and recurrent malignant ascites. In both Arms, the plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of BAX69 will be characterized, and pharmacodynamics (PD) markers will be explored in plasma and ascites. Two expansion cohorts will further assess the tolerability of the RP2D and explore clinical signs of efficacy.