View clinical trials related to Artificial Respiration.
Filter by:The goal of this observational study is to evaluate whether the airway occlusion pressure recorded during a sudden end-expiratory breath-hold (ΔPocc) is correlated with esophageal swing in pressure and the reliability of P0.1, driving pressure, plateau pressure, pressure-muscle index, and diaphragm ultrasound as noninvasive estimates of inspiratory effort and lung distension in hypoxemic patients undergoing NIV. The main questions this trial aims to answer are: - Primary Outcome: whether the airway occlusion pressure recorded during a sudden end-expiratory breath-hold (ΔPocc) is correlated with esophageal swing in pressure and the reliability of various noninvasive estimates of inspiratory effort and lung distension in hypoxemic patients undergoing NIV. Secondary outcomes will include: - Statistic metric of association between P0.1, ΔP, PMI and ΔPes - Statistic metric of association between P0.1, ΔPocc, ΔP, PMI and PaO2/FiO2 ratio - Statistic metric of association between P0.1, ΔPocc, ΔP, PMI and tidal volume - Statistic metric of association between P0.1, ΔPocc, ΔP, PMI and DTF% - Statistic metric of association between P0.1, ΔPocc, ΔP, PMI and Ex/DTF% - Statistic metric of association between P0.1, ΔPocc, ΔP, PMI and respiratory rate, VAS dyspnea and VAS discomfort. Participants will undergo the following tasks and treatments: - Complete written informed consent before enrollment. - Post-extubation noninvasive ventilation via nose-to-mouth and full-face masks. - Monitoring of esophageal pressure (in all patients the catheter will be placed before extubation, according to clinical judgment, and its correct position will be verified through a positive pressure occlusion test) - Continuous recording of airway pressure, flow, and esophageal pressure (Pes), using a dedicated pneumotachograph and pressure transducer. - Sudden end-inspiratory and end-expiratory occlusion maneuvers, to measure plateau pressure (Pplat) and end-expiratory airway occlusion pressure (ΔPocc), respectively. - Collection of hemodynamic and arterial blood-gas parameters, performed according to clinical judgment, along with assessments of dyspnea and discomfort using a modified visual analogue scale (VAS). - Diaphragm ultrasound during occlusion maneuvers, measuring diaphragm displacement, diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF%), and diaphragmatic excursion (Ex) under various conditions.
Conventional continuous mandatory mechanical ventilation relies on the passive recoil of the chest wall for expiration. This results in an exponentially decreasing expiratory flow. Flow controlled ventilation (FCV), a new ventilation mode with constant, continuous, controlled expiratory flow, has recently become clinically available and is increasingly being adopted for complex mechanical ventilation during surgery. In both clinical and pre-clinical settings, an improvement in ventilation (CO2 clearance) has been observed during FCV compared to conventional ventilation. Recently, Schranc et al. compared flow-controlled ventilation with pressure-regulated volume control in both double lung ventilation and one-lung ventilation in pigs. They report differences in dead space ventilation that may explain the improved CO2 clearance, although their study was not designed to compare dead space ventilation within the group of double lung ventilation. Dead space ventilation, or "wasted ventilation", is the ventilation of hypoperfused lung zones, and is clinically relevant, as it is a strong predictor of mortality in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and is correlated with higher airway driving pressures which are thought to be injurious to the lung (lung stress). This trial aims to study the difference in dead space ventilation between conventional mechanical ventilation in volume-controlled mode and flow controlled-ventilation.
Intraoperative protective ventilation with low tidal volumes (TV), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and possibly lung recruitment maneuvers (RMs) reduces postoperative pulmonary complications. In thoracic surgery, in one-lung ventilation (OLV), the evidence is lacking. However, in this context protective ventilation with PEEP titration is related to better intraoperative oxygenation and respiratory mechanics. It is not clear whether this strategy is associated also with better postoperative oxygenation and less postoperative pulmonary complications.
Laparoscopy and robotic techniques are widespread procedures for pelvic gynecologic, urologic and abdominal surgery often performed in Trendelenburg position, with the application of pneumoperitoneum by inflating carbon dioxide. The rise in abdominal pressure following pneumoperitoneum and the head down body position have been shown to impair the respiratory function during the procedure, mainly inducing atelectasis formation in the dependent lung regions, worsening stress and strain of the alveolar structure. The application of a ventilator strategy providing positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been shown to reduce the diaphragm cranial shift, increasing functional residual capacity and decreasing respiratory system elastance. Furthermore, the application of recruiting maneuver followed by the subsequent application of PEEP improved oxygenation. These results are in accordance with finding by Talmor et al, evaluating the effect of a mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury patients. However a comparison between an esophageal pressure piloted mechanical ventilation and a conventional low tidal ventilator strategy with adjunct of PEEP and recruitment maneuvers according to clinical judgment has never been investigated in patients undergoing robotic gynecologic, abdominal or urologic surgery. The investigators aim to compare the conventional ventilation strategy (i.e. with application of PEEP and recruitment manoeuvre) with a ventilation driven by transpulmonary pressure assessed through an esophageal catheter, in patients undergoing to robotic surgery, with respect to oxygenation, expressed in terms of arterial oxygen tension - inspired oxygen fraction ratio (PaO2/FiO2) (primary endpoint), intraoperative respiratory mechanics indexes, number of lung recruitment maneuvers, rate and type of perioperative complications until hospital discharge (additional endpoint).
The aim of this study is to evaluate the ventilator settings advice given by the BEACON care system in fitting with best level of support in patient under mechanical ventilation in Pressure Support mode.
The purpose of this study is to determine if a weaning strategy from artificial ventilation governs by respiratory behaviour status assessed by our method is safe enough.