Clinical Trials Logo

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06394609 Completed - Clinical trials for Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Comparison of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Using Double Loaded Grand Knot Technique Versus Double Loaded Knotted Suture Anchor

Start date: December 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Arthroscopic surgery is the preferred method to fix a Bankart lesion (tears in the labrum) and has better patient outcomes. It's important to assess any bone loss in the shoulder socket before surgery for a successful outcome. Using suture anchors to reattach the torn tissue is advantageous because it avoids going through the back of the shoulder. The article describes a specific technique for tying the sutures and anchor placement to minimize nerve and artery damage. Design of the suture anchor and how the suture is placed can affect its strength. Using two sutures per anchor (double-loaded) might be just as strong as using three anchors with one suture each (single-loaded), which is more common. This could save cost and bone but needs further study. The study proposes a new surgical technique using double-loaded anchors with more sutures to see if it offers similar strength while reducing implant use.

NCT ID: NCT00889109 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Shoulder Proprioception Following Open and Arthroscopic Instability Repair

Start date: July 2009
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Shoulder dislocations are common and may result in functionally disabling instability. Disruption of the shoulder capsuloligamentous complex during shoulder dislocation is related to poor proprioceptive and stabilizing capabilities of the joint. It has been demonstrated that surgical restoration of the normal glenohumeral capsular tensioning improves the proprioceptive capability of the shoulder and plays an important roll in restoring shoulder stability. Several studies compared the proprioceptive capabilities of the shoulder between different surgical procedures, however only few have used the "dynamic unrestricted 3-dimensional arm movement model" that has been shown to be more appropriate for assessment of glenohumeral proprioception. To our knowledge, no previous study has compared proprioception measures of the glenohumeral joint following arthroscopic versus open repair for anterior shoulder instability, using the 3-dimensional unrestricted arm movement model.