View clinical trials related to Arthrodesis.
Filter by:For twenty years, as for other surgical disciplines, new minimally invasive techniques have been developed with the main goal the reduction of muscle trauma associated with the surrounding roads "classic" and reduce morbidity linked to this one. More recently, minimally invasive methods dedicated to spinal surgery were established, for the treatment of herniated discs initially, then for narrow lumbar canals. The canal release on minimally invasive fusion, using a tubular system for muscle retraction is a new technique that has proven effective: post operative pain reduction of hospital stay and blood loss. The objective of the study is to investigate the quality of ductal release in these minimally invasive fusions. Main objective of the study: Evaluation of the quality of the release of post scanners operative minimally invasive arthrodesis Secondary Objectives: Assessment rates/types of early complications of technical Minimally invasive - early postoperative results (postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, length of hospital stay, blood loss) - in clinical outcomes in the short and medium term decompression after minimally invasive fusion.
Ultrasonic bone osteotome has been utilized in various surgical field, but the use in neurosurgery especially in spine surgery is not widely spread. In the present study, the investigators are going to compare bony fusion rate after cervical laminotomy either with ultrasonic osteotome or conventional drill.
There are many ways of performing arthrodesis in the foot and ankle. Dowel fusion is one of them. The in situ technique was first described by Ottolenghi et al. (1970) and was taken up by Baciu and Filibiu (1979). In the technique, they did take the dowel out before turning it. The healing process takes place between surfaces of spongious bone. They showed excellent results with early weight bearing and healing within 12.5 weeks. Stranks et al. (1994) combined the dowel technique with screw fixation and claimed 95 % healing rate within 12.5 weeks. Others have not found this technique satisfactory in rheumatoid arthritis patients (Belt et al. 2001). The results were not compatible to common fusion techniques. The reason may be the circular bone gap of at least 1 mm left by the saw blade. A new instrumentation and a new staple with a central wedge (ASTUS) avoid this gap and allow the dowel to be turned in situ without leaving in position. The staple is introduced into the joint line and will compress the dowel surfaces against the surrounding bone. Instruments are available to ensure the correct position and length of the dowel, and to rotate it in situ before the special wedge staple is introduced. Dr Kofoed, the surgeon designer of the ASTUS Staple, has communicated on his first series with 83 arthrodesis. The purpose of this study is now to collect and publish data from several centers, several users. The objective of this study is to obtain the percentage of healing 3 months after an implantation of the staple ASTUS.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the radiographic outcomes of Total Ankle Arthroplasty in patients having a calcaneal stem.