Arthritis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Post-Market Study of Robotic-Arm Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Comparison to Traditional UKA (Fixed and Mobile Bearings)
The purposes of this investigation is to 1) To determine if Robotic-arm assisted UKA (RA-UKA) allows for more accurate component placement than manual UKA (MI-UKA)and 2) prospectively assess the learning curve, radiographic, and clinical outcomes of use of the RIO system as it is incorporated into our clinical practice and compare it to historical data on manual UKAs and TKAs.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is known to have excellent long-term survivorship and clinical success in the management of degenerative joint disease, and remains the primary treatment for patients with bi- or tri-compartmental osteoarthritis. However, the patient population seeking knee arthroplasty is evolving, with patients being younger and more demanding on their prostheses (1). Recent investigations have highlighted that there remains a high incidence of residual symptoms including grinding/popping/clicking, swelling, and difficulties getting in and out of a car and chair, and 16% of patients remain "unsatisfied" following TKA (1). Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains a viable alternative to total knee arthroplasty in patients presenting with isolated, medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Its use has increased in popularity in the United States, as the number of UKA performed over the last decade has increased by 30%(1). Proposed benefits of UKA include a smaller incision, less blood loss as well as shorter recovery time to functional level. Other benefits of UKAs include improved knee range of motion and better restoration of the knee kinematics (2, 5). These benefits are attributed to the less invasive nature of the procedure with preservation of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments, and minimal bony resections. Unfortunately, historically the survival rate of UKA has been poor, with several reports demonstrating a survival rate of only 65-70% at 7-10 year follow-up (8, 9). These historically poor results have been attributed to instrumentation that was difficult to use, poor indications for the surgical procedure, and inadequate implant designs. More recent reports have shown 10-year survival rates ranging from 91% to 98% using both mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing UKA designs (7, 10-12). Mobile bearing UKA have a 92% survival rate at 20 years (5). However, the vast majority of these studies were performed at high-volume centers, and national joint registries have continued to demonstrate an increased rate of early failure and decreased survivorship of UKA versus TKA(13). Recently, robotic-assisted UKA has been introduced to improve the accuracy of implant positioning (4). As implant positioning including alignment and translation in the coronal and sagittal planes and implant sizing are critical for success after UKA, the addition of robotic-assistance theoretically can improve radiographic alignment and clinical outcomes. Currently, the most common robotic guidance system used in UKA is the Robotic Arm Interactive Orthopedic System (RIO; MAKO Surgical; Ft. Lauderdale, FLA). The purposes of this investigation is to 1) retrospectively review the radiographic and clinical outcomes of medial UKA using conventional techniques performed at our institution and 2) prospectively assess the learning curve, radiographic, and clinical outcomes of use of the RIO system as it is incorporated into our clinical practice. ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04228458 -
ThermRheum Version 1
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04976972 -
A Comparison of Patients Receiving a Total Knee Replacement With Robotic Assistance or With Conventional Instrumentation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04037436 -
Functional Exercise and Nutrition Education Program for Older Adults
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00069342 -
Health Beliefs and Health Behaviors Among Minorities With Rheumatic Diseases
|
||
Completed |
NCT02944448 -
A Study Evaluating Pain Relief and Safety of Orally Administered CR845 in Patients With Osteoarthritis of Hip or Knee
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02498808 -
Interferon-lambda: Novel Biologics for Controlling Neutrophil-mediated Pathology in Rheumatic Diseases?
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02777060 -
Exploring the Effectiveness of Sensor-based Balance Training on Patient Outcome Measures
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT02487888 -
A Study of the Impact of Genetic Testing on Clinical Decision Making and Patient Care
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02136251 -
Total Shoulder Replacement Outcomes With Autologous Bone Graft as Fixator for Glenoid Anchor Peg.
|
||
Completed |
NCT02143206 -
Modifying Exercise for the COPD Patient
|
||
Completed |
NCT01407874 -
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Dose-Response Study of the Safety and Uric Acid Effects of Oral Ulodesine Added to Allopurinol in Subjects With Gout and Concomitant Moderate Renal Insufficiency
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01285843 -
Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density After Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through a Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach (AMIS) With Either an AMIStem or a Quadra Femoral Component
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01172327 -
Self-Directed Exercise Program for Adults With Arthritis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00987870 -
Safety and Efficacy of BFH772 in Psoriasis Patients
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00750984 -
A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques for Total Hip Resurfacing
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01184924 -
Evaluation of the Arthritis Foundation Tai Chi Program
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00611585 -
A Safety and Efficacy Study of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00379184 -
Sensitization in Osteoarthritic Knees
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00175448 -
Comparison of Physiotherapy Versus Home Exercise Following Hip Replacement Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00403676 -
Nursing Consultation in Out-patient Clinics for Patients With Inflammatory Rheumatic Disease
|
N/A |