ART Adherence clinical trials

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

View clinical trials related to ART Adherence.

Filter by:

Not yet recruiting
Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06423612 Not yet recruiting - ART Adherence Clinical Trials

Randomized Trial to Optimize Virologic Suppression Rates Using a Point-of-Care Urine Monitoring Assay (ROVING PUMA)

ROVING-PUMA

Start date: July 1, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has significantly decreased the morbidity and mortality of HIV infection. However, adherence challenges in taking daily oral ART persist. A retrospective cohort study across 31 countries from 2010-19 reported that only 65% of people with HIV (PWH) on ART exhibited virologic suppression (VS) three years after starting ART;1 the rate of VS in South Africa among PWH on ART is 60-65%. Adherence barriers span individual and structural factors, such as stigma, recall difficulties, housing and/or food insecurity, mental illness, substance use, transportation, stock-outs, and other factors that vary by country and population. Adherence interventions can benefit from direct objective adherence monitoring. Pharmacologic metrics of adherence assess drug levels in plasma, dried blood spots, hair (a metric our group pioneered) or urine and predict outcomes more accurately than self-reported adherence. However, most of these metrics preclude real-time assessment, requiring expensive laboratory equipment and trained laboratory personnel. Thus, few adherence interventions have successfully incorporated objective metrics, likely due to laboratory and shipping delays. A low-cost (<$2/test) point-of-care adherence metric - developed by our group - should allow for real-time biofeedback and improve the impact of metric-driven adherence interventions.