Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04053816 |
Other study ID # |
260639 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
Phase 3
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
October 20, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
May 2024 |
Study information
Verified date |
February 2024 |
Source |
Barts & The London NHS Trust |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a strategy of maintaining serum potassium
levels at ≥3.6 mEq/L is non-inferior to a strategy of usual treatment (≥4.5 mEq/L) on the
occurrence of new onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (AFACS) in patients
undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
Description:
At least one in three patients is affected by atrial fibrillation after cardiac
surgery(AFACS), with most episodes occurring in the first five postoperative days. AF
occurrence is associated with increased morbidity, short and long-term mortality, intensive
care unit (ICU) and hospital stay and cost of care. Persistence of these associations after
adjustment for potential confounding factors suggests that they may be causal. The incidence
and prevalence of AF and its associated costs are expected to increase as the surgical
population ages. Extensive effort is undertaken to prevent AF after cardiac surgery from
occurring, but clinical practice in this area is highly variable and the evidence base for
most interventions is sparse.
Potassium plays an important role in cardiac electrophysiology. Serum potassium
concentrations ([K+]) are commonly low following cardiac surgery, and appear marginally lower
in those suffering atrial arrhythmias in non-surgical cohorts. Despite an absence of proof
that this association is causal, efforts to maintain serum [K+] in the 'high-normal' range (≥
4.5 mEq/L), as opposed to just intervening if potassium drops below its lower 'normal'
threshold (<3.6 mEq/L), are considered 'routine practice' for AF prevention in post-surgical
patients in many centres across the world.
From the (unpublished) data from our Tight-K Feasibility Study, all 160 patients would have
required at least one dose of potassium to supplement their levels to this high-normal range
and 45.5% of all serum [K+] measurements were below 4.5mEq/L at some point. Data from the
same pilot study show a median number of potassium doses given in the 'tight' group
(high-normal serum potassium target) of seven, compared to a median of one, with most
patients not receiving any potassium supplementation at all, in the 'relaxed' group. This
demonstrated for the first time ever, that the practice does achieve a separation in serum
potassium levels between the two groups, so the protocol is indeed effective in achieving
higher serum potassium levels.
The efficacy of the practice of maintaining high-normal serum potassium levels for the
prevention of AF after cardiac surgery, however, remains unproven and data supporting it are
extremely limited, being derived from observational studies rather than randomised trials.
Indeed, no data exist to demonstrate that maintaining a high-normal potassium level is
beneficial in these circumstances, or that aggressive replenishment of potassium in these
patients improves outcome.
Meanwhile, potassium supplementation may cause discomfort or harm. Routine central venous
potassium administration in the early post-operative period, when oral supplementation is not
possible, is time-consuming, costly and associated with clinical risk: rapid infusion can
prove fatal, and leaving central venous catheters in situ for the sole purpose of potassium
replacement increases infection risk. Oral replacement (when feasible) is commonly associated
with profound nausea and gastrointestinal side effects, and is very poorly tolerated by
patients. The annual costs of intravenous potassium exceed those for other drugs in many
cardiac surgical units due to the large quantities administered. Nursing time (e.g. for drug
checks and administration) will add to this cost.
The routine maintenance of serum [K+] ≥ 4.5 mEq/L is a costly practice of unproven efficacy
that is unpleasant and may be hazardous for patients. The investigators shall address this
issue, performing the first appropriately powered non-inferiority multicentre randomised
trial of potassium supplementation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.