Filter results

Appropriate Use Criteria clinical trials

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

View clinical trials related to Appropriate Use Criteria.

Filter by:

None
Page 1

NCT ID: NCT02880605 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Revascularization

Validation of Chinese Version Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization

Start date: August 2016
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Coronary revascularization (CR) is increasing rapidly in China and varies significantly in proportion ( PCI:CABG=15:1). Few studies assess the appropriateness of CR in China. Recently, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease organized experts to release Chinese version appropriate use criteria(C-AUC) for coronary revascularization by RAND method aimed at regulating indications of CR. The criteria is considered to contribute to clinical practices, quality assessment and health insurance policy, however, the validation of C-AUC is unknown. Thus the investigators study aims at assessing the validation of Chinese AUC by multi-center prospective registry. The investigators will recruit 4000 patients undergoing elective coronary angiography with positive outcome consecutively and collect baseline information. Sequently, one-year follow up will be done to collect the prognose, including death, rehospitalization, medicine, medical compliance and life quality etc. One hand, the investigators will compare the outcomes between different therapies in the same indications according to C-AUC to evaluate the validation of C-AUC. On the other hand, the investigators will evaluate the rationality of CAD therapy in Beijing by C-AUC.