Appetite Control Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized, Controlled, Cross-over Study of the Effect of Snacks on Appetite Control
Verified date | August 2021 |
Source | St. Boniface Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This clinical trial is being conducted to study whether eating certain snacks will reduce your desire to eat and for a longer period of time compared to other snacks. The investigators are testing 2 different snacks. Study #1 will involve eating 2 different seed-like snacks or water. Study #2 will involve eating pita bread with jam, bread with jam or water. The test snack is higher in protein and/or fibre compared to the reference product.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 46 |
Est. completion date | August 23, 2014 |
Est. primary completion date | August 23, 2014 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 20 Years to 70 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Body mass index 18-30kg/m2 - males and non-pregnant or non-lactating females Exclusion Criteria: - Diagnosis of disease by a medical doctor that requires medical treatment during the study period. - Daily tobacco use. - Physical Activity Level >1.8. - Eat meals at irregular or unusual times. - Food allergy, aversion or unwillingness to eat study foods. - Use of any prescription or non-prescription drug, herbal or nutritional supplement known to affect appetite. - Presence of a gastrointestinal disorder. - Score >65% on any 1 of the 3 categories of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire-R18. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | I. H. Asper Clinical Research Institute | Winnipeg | Manitoba |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
St. Boniface Hospital | Manitoba Agri-Health Research Network |
Canada,
Belski R. Fiber, protein, and lupin-enriched foods: role for improving cardiovascular health. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2012;66:147-215. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394597-6.00004-5. Review. — View Citation
Blundell J, de Graaf C, Hulshof T, Jebb S, Livingstone B, Lluch A, Mela D, Salah S, Schuring E, van der Knaap H, Westerterp M. Appetite control: methodological aspects of the evaluation of foods. Obes Rev. 2010 Mar;11(3):251-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00714.x. Epub 2010 Jan 29. Review. — View Citation
Paddon-Jones D, Westman E, Mattes RD, Wolfe RR, Astrup A, Westerterp-Plantenga M. Protein, weight management, and satiety. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 May;87(5):1558S-1561S. Review. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Gastrointestinal Side Effects | Participants were asked if they noticed any gastrointestinal side effects after having eaten the study food and the results were recorded. | 24h | |
Other | Likeability of Test and Reference Products Based on Sensory Scales | Likability of the study products was assessed using a 5-point hedonic scale (1 = dislike extremely; 2 = dislike very moderately; 3 = neither like or dislike; 4 = like moderately; 5 = like extremely) for appearance, aroma, flavour, taste, texture and overall liking. | immediately after eating test or reference product | |
Primary | Total Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Hunger, Fullness, Desire to Eat and Prospective Consumption Using Visual Analog Scales (VAS) | Appetite assessment was measured using a VAS questionnaire administered pre-snack and every 30 minutes post snack up to 180 minutes, for a total of 7 time points. The questionnaire included 4 questions (1) How hungry are you? (2) How full are you? (3) How strong is your desire to eat? (4) How much do you think you want to eat right now? Each question was followed by a 10 cm line anchored at the left and right ends by the opposing statements "not at all" and "extremely" for questions 1 and 2, "very weak " and "very strong" for question 3, and "nothing at all" and "a very large amount" for question 4. Participants provided their response to each question by marking a perpendicular line on the 10-cm line to indicate their answer. Scores were determined by measuring the distance in centimeters from the left anchor to the perpendicular line drawn by the participant. VAS scores over time were graphed and AUC was calculated using the trapezoid method. | VAS administered pre-snack and then every 30 minutes after the first bite up to 180 minutes for a total of 7 time points. | |
Secondary | Number of Calories Consumed Post-snack Until Bedtime | Participants were provided with a food diary to record the amount and type of each food and beverage consumed for the remainder of the day. Energy consumed at lunch and the remainder of the day were quantified from food consumed at lunch and the food diary using Food Processor Nutrient Analysis Software. | time between snack consumption and bedtime (12 hours) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05935072 -
Nutritional Responses to Acute Exercise: Test of the Influence of the Nature of the Meal:
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06395051 -
Effects of Ketone Monoesters on Brain Function
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05141526 -
Satiating Diet, Appetite Control and Body Weight Loss in Individuals With Obesity
|
N/A |