Appendicitis Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Single-incision Laparoscopic (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy for the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis
Recent advances in laparoscopic instrumentation have made it possible to perform intra-abdominal operations entirely through a small incision that can be hidden within the umbilicus. The goal is to perform surgery with fewer incisions and no visible scars. Other potential benefits are faster recovery, less pain, and fewer wound complications. The term SILS (Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery) is being used to describe such techniques, and many have touted SILS as a major breakthrough in minimally-invasive surgery, moving the field closer to surgery that is bloodless, incisionless, and painless. Despite the hype, prospective comparisons of SILS versus conventional laparoscopy are lacking. Results of SILS procedures have generally been limited to case reports and small case series that lack controls. The investigators propose to conduct a prospective, randomized, single-center trial of SILS appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy to treat acute appendicitis. Primary end-points are operative time, complication rate, postoperative pain, recovery time, and long-term cosmetic outcome. The investigators hypothesize SILS appendectomy is equivalent to laparoscopic appendectomy with respect to operative time, complication rate, postoperative pain, and recovery time while providing a better cosmetic outcome.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND METHODS Patient Enrollment: The study population will consist of
patients who come to the emergency room with acute abdominal pain and are found to have
acute appendicitis on the basis of clinical evaluation and CT of the abdomen/pelvis. At
UCSF, such patients are first evaluated by a small group of general surgeons who provide
emergency consultations. Once a decision to operate has been made on clinical grounds, the
principal investigator (Dr. Carter) or his delegate will be contacted to approach the
patient for enrollment and informed consent.
All patients will receive standard care which consists of preoperative broad-spectrum
antibiotics consisting of Zosyn, Ertapenem, or Cipro/Flagyl and intravenous fluids.
Surgeon Enrollment: All surgeons at UCSF who take call in the Emergency Department routinely
perform conventional laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Surgeons wishing to
participate in the trial will perform 5 proctored SILS appendectomies outside of the trial
before enrolling patients. We chose the number 5 because one study showed that SILS
operative times (a surrogate for procedural mastery) leveled off by the 5th case for
surgeons already proficient in laparoscopy.
Randomization: After enrollment, patients will be assigned to conventional laparoscopic
appendectomy versus SILS appendectomy in a 1:1 ratio by a computerized random number
generator (http://www.random.org). Even-numbered patients will receive conventional
laparoscopic appendectomy, odd-numbered will receive SILS appendectomy.
Conventional laparoscopic appendectomy technique: Patients are placed in the supine position
and given a general anesthetic. An orogastric tube is placed. Sequential compression devices
are placed on the legs. Unless the patient has just voided, a Foley catheter is placed in
the bladder. The left arm is tucked and the abdomen shaved as necessary. The umbilical skin
is anesthetized with 5mL of 0.25% marcaine. A 1.5cm vertical or transverse skin incision is
made within the umbilical stalk, the fascia is retracted, and a 1.5cm vertical fascial
incision made with a scalpel. A 12mm Hasson port is placed through the fascia and the
abdomen insufflated to 15mmHg with carbon dioxide gas. Alternatively, a small nick in the
fascia can be made, a Veress needle used to achieve pneumoperitoneum, and a 12mm VersSTEP
port placed through an introducer sheath. Diagnostic laparoscopy is then performed, with
inspection of the stomach, liver, gallbladder, colon, small intestines, and pelvis. If a
diagnosis other than acute appendicitis is made (such as pelvic inflammatory disease,
sigmoid diverticulitis, cecal diverticulitis, Crohn's disease, perforated duodenal ulcer,
etc.), the patient is excluded from the study and treated appropriately. If the appendix
looks normal and no other pathology is found in the abdomen, the patient may stay enrolled
in the study if the surgeon decides to remove the appendix.
Additional 5mm ports are placed in the left lower quadrant and suprapubic midline after the
skin and peritoneum are anesthetized with 0.25% marcaine. A 5mm camera is transferred to the
left lower quadrant port site and the appendix is exposed and retracted anteriorly. The
mesoappendix may be divided with EndoGIA staplers, Ligasure, cautery and clips, or Harmonic
Scalpel. The base of the appendix may be ligated with EndoGIA staplers or Endoloop. The
appendix is removed through the umbilical incision after first placing it into an EndoCatch
bag. Minimal irrigation is used; perforated cases are treated with suctioning of
intra-abdominal pus and postoperative antibiotics. Blood loss is estimated. Umbilical fascia
length is measured in millimeters, then closed with 0-Maxon absorbable suture. The umbilical
skin is anesthetized with 0.25% marcaine, and all skin edges re-approximated with 4-0
biosyn. Indermil glue is the only dressing.
SILS Appendectomy Technique: Patients are placed in the supine position and given a general
anesthetic. An orogastric tube is placed. Sequential compression devices are placed on the
legs. Unless the patient has just voided, a Foley catheter is placed in the bladder. The
left arm is tucked and the abdomen shaved as necessary. The base of the umbilical stalk is
everted by two penetrating towel clamps placed either side of the midline. The skin is
anesthetized with 5mL of 0.25% marcaine. A vertical skin incision is made within the
umbilical stalk, the fascia is retracted, and a 3 cm vertical fascial incision made with a
scalpel. The peritoneum is entered with either a gloved finger, Kelly clamp, or scissors.
The incision is retracted anteriorly with an Army/Navy retractor, and the SILSPort inserted
into the incision using a shoe-horn maneuver. 5mm trocars are placed in the SILSPortâ„¢, and
the abdomen insufflated to 15mmHg with carbon dioxide gas, after which the trocars are
repositioned into a staggered elevation. Diagnostic laparoscopy is then performed, with
inspection of the stomach, liver, gallbladder, colon, small intestines, and pelvis. If a
diagnosis other than acute appendicitis is made (such as pelvic inflammatory disease,
sigmoid diverticulitis, cecal diverticulitis, Crohn's disease, perforated duodenal ulcer,
etc.), the patient is excluded from the study and treated appropriately. If the appendix
looks normal and no other pathology is found in the abdomen, the patient may stay enrolled
in the study if the surgeon decides to remove the appendix.
The appendix is exposed and retracted anteriorly. The mesoappendix may be divided with
EndoGIA staplers, Ligasure, cautery and clips, or Harmonic Scalpel. The base of the appendix
may be ligated with EndoGIA staplers or Endoloop. When staplers are used, one of the 5mm
trocars is replaced with a 12mm trocar. The appendix is removed through the umbilical
incision after first placing it into an EndoCatch bag. Minimal irrigation is used;
perforated cases are treated with suctioning of intra-abdominal pus and postoperative
antibiotics. Blood loss is estimated. Umbilical fascia length is measured in millimeters,
then closed with 0-Maxon absorbable simple interrupted sutures. Skin edges re-approximated
with 4-0 biosyn. Indermil glue is the primary dressing.
Postoperative Care: Patients are given a full liquid diet immediately after surgery, and are
advanced to an unrestricted diet as soon as the patient feels up to it. Pain is controlled
by a hydromorphone PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) pump for at least 12 hours after
surgery, after which oral pain medications are prescribed. If the patient is allergic to
hydromorphone, morphine may be used. No supplemental pain medications (Motrin, Toradol,
etc.) will be used for patients enrolled in the study. No steroids (e.g. Decadron) will be
given. Antibiotics for appendicitis are given at the discretion of the attending surgeon.
Patients are discharged at the discretion of the attending surgeon, generally when the
patient can eat without vomiting, pain is controlled with oral medications, and the systemic
inflammatory response to the appendicitis has subsided.
After 2-3 weeks, follow-up occurs in Dr. Carter's clinic. The wounds are assessed for
infection, seroma, or hernia. Date of return-to-work and date of last opiate pain medication
are recorded. At 6 months, patients return to clinic and complete a survey. The survey
includes a Body Image Questionnaire, a Cosmetic Appearance Scale, and a Photo Series
Questionnaire, all of which have been validated.8-12 The Body Image Questionnaire measures
patients' perception of and satisfaction with their own body and explores attitudes toward
their bodily appearance. Five questions are asked, with up to four points assigned per
question, totaling 20 possible points. The Cosmetic Appearance Scale assesses the degree of
patient satisfaction about the physical appearance of the abdomen (and its scars) using
100-mm visual analogue scale. The patient is asked to make a mark along the horizontal scale
that indicates the overall aesthetic appearance of the abdomen as a whole, and incisions
separately. Numeric scores are then obtained by measuring the horizontal distance from the
low end of the scale to the marking, rounded to the nearest millimeter. Finally, the Photo
Series Questionnaire assesses whether knowledge of the cosmetic results of the alternative
approach (SILS or conventional laparoscopic) influences the evaluation of the scar. It also
measures the strength of the preference. Patients who do not return for follow-up will be
mailed a survey and/or called for a telephone interview. Data management and interviews will
be managed by a research assistant hired for the study.
Definition of Study Variables and Outcome Measures Patient Characteristics: Age, height,
weight, prior operations in the abdomen
Intraoperative Variables:
1. Operative time - defined as the amount of time to perform the operation from
skin-incision to application of the dressing. This time is routinely charted by the
circulating nurse in the operating room.
2. Conversion - defined by the use of incisions and/or trocars in addition to the ones
described in the Methods section, or the need to perform an open procedure.
3. Visceral or vascular injury - defined as injury to the intestines, colon, omentum,
vasculature, or pelvic organs during the dissection requiring intervention (suture or
stapled repair, use of hemostatic agents).
4. Umbilical fascia incision length (in millimeters).
Postoperative Variables:
1. Mean pain score over 12 hours - Pain is assess by the ward nurse as needed, but at
least every four hours, and documented in the patient's chart. Pain is scored on a
scale of 0-10, 10 being the most severe pain imaginable. Average pain score for that
patient is calculated over the first 12 hours (the time the patient is on a
hydromorphone PCA)
2. Hydromorphone use over 12 hours - Total hydromorphone usage (in milligrams) is charted
by the floor nurse. The amount used in the first 12 hours after surgery, starting from
the time the patient is discharged from the recovery room, is recorded.
3. Length of stay - Number of calendar days the patient is hospitalized.
4. Wound infection - Defined as the need for additional antibiotics, prescribed beyond the
perioperative antibiotics given for acute appendicitis, for the purpose or treating a
wound cellulitis, or the need to open the wound to drain a wound abscess, within 6
months of surgery.
5. Deep space infection - Defined as the need for reoperation, readmission, or
percutaneous drainage of a deep (organ space) infection within 6 months of surgery. All
intra-abdominal abscesses are classified as deep space infections.
6. Wound seroma - Defined as an un-inflamed fluid collection under the skin incision > 1cm
in diameter identified within 6 months of surgery.
7. Time to return to work - Defined as the number of calendar days between discharge from
the hospital and the first day back at work.
8. Date of last opiate pain medication use.
9. Readmission with 30 days.
10. Body Image Score at 6 months
11. Cosmetic Appearance Scale at 6 months.
12. Photo Series Questionnaire at 6 months.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04529980 -
Probiotics and Antibiotic Associated Diarrhea in Pediatric Complicated Appendicitis
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03528343 -
Narcotic vs. Non-narcotic Pain Regimens After Pediatric Appendectomy
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03522233 -
Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC) in Children With Appendix Ultrasounds
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03380793 -
A Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Morinidazole in Patients With Appendicitis
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02108340 -
Comparative Study of Microwave Radiometry and Ultrasonography for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02029781 -
The Laparoscopic Appendicitis Score; a Multicenter Validation Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01356641 -
Antibiotic Treatment Alone for Acute Simple Appendicitis in Children
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01515293 -
Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT00971438 -
Structured Management of Patients With Suspicion of Appendicitis Using a Clinical Score and Selective Imaging
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00913380 -
Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Low-dose Computed Tomography (CT) Versus Standard-dose CT
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00530998 -
Minimally Invasive Surgery: Using Natural Orfices
|
||
Completed |
NCT00616616 -
Single Incision Laparoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00195351 -
Study Comparing Tigecycline Versus Ceftriaxone Sodium Plus Metronidazole in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02916134 -
Conservative Versus Operative ManageMent of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04614649 -
Right Iliac Fossa Treatment-Turkey Audit
|
||
Completed |
NCT04365491 -
European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) Cohort Study Snapshot Audit 2020 - Acute Appendicitis
|
||
Completed |
NCT03770897 -
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by Junior SUrgeonS: Impact of 3D Visualization on Surgical Outcome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02507674 -
Point of Care 3D Ultrasound for Pediatric Appendicitis: a Pilot Study
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01718275 -
Non-operative Management of Early Appendicitis in Children
|
||
Terminated |
NCT01575028 -
Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Versus Local Anesthetic for Lap Appendectomies
|
Phase 2 |