Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01635244
Other study ID # N015029-00
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received July 1, 2012
Last updated May 13, 2016
Start date July 2012
Est. completion date December 2015

Study information

Verified date May 2016
Source University of Michigan
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Institutional Review Board
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to:

1. Assess for hemodynamic differences at rest and with exercise between three clinically available tissue aortic valves.

2. Assess for differences in left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (recovery of LV hypertrophy, and changes in LV systolic and diastolic function) after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis (AS) between three clinically available aortic valve bioprosthesis.


Description:

Various aortic valve prostheses have unique hemodynamic characteristics, and there is on-going interest in defining those hemodynamic characteristics in the interest of avoiding residual LV outflow obstruction and prosthesis-patient mismatch (residual LV outflow obstruction despite a normally functioning prosthesis ) after aortic valve replacement. Attempts to compare hemodynamics between prostheses have been limited by different sizing systems used by various manufacturers (precluding meaningful comparison of valves by valve size) and biological variability of in vivo gradients and effective orifice area for any valve (making potentially small differences in hemodynamics difficult to detect). Assessment of hemodynamics during increased cardiac output associated with exercise testing has been used to better define potentially subtle differences in hemodynamics between valve prostheses. In addition, assessment for change in LV geometry (notably including LV hypertrophy) after aortic valve replacement has been used as a surrogate marker of aortic prosthesis hemodynamics.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date December 2015
Est. primary completion date December 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Age = 18 years.

- Severe aortic stenosis (AS) based on overall clinical impression, with or without aortic valve mean gradient = 40 mm Hg, EOA < 1.0 cm2, or EOA index < 0.6 cm2/m2.

- Scheduled for clinically indicated elective aortic valve replacement for a primary diagnosis of severe AS.

- Less than moderate aortic regurgitation on preoperative testing.

- Isolated aortic valve replacement; or aortic valve replacement with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting, ascending aorta repair, or mitral and/or tricuspid annuloplasty for functional mitral regurgitation / tricuspid regurgitation.

- Left ventricular ejection fraction = 40% on preoperative testing.

- Physically able and willing to pedal a recumbent bicycle.

- Patient and surgeon agree that the patient will undergo valve replacement with a bioprosthesis.

- Patient and surgeon agree that the use of one specific bioprosthesis manufacturer / model is not indicated based on clinical criteria.

- Willing to undergo randomization to have implanted one of three bioprosthesis at the time of aortic valve replacement.

- Willing and able to undergo preoperative echocardiography/Doppler for purposes of the research study.

- Willing and able to undergo post-operative exercise stress echocardiography/Doppler 5 to 7 months after valve replacement for purposes of the research protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Age < 18 years.

- AS felt by overall clinical impression to be less than severe.

- Aortic valve replacement is urgent or emergent.

- Moderate of more aortic regurgitation on preoperative testing.

- Concomitant mitral or tricuspid valve replacement.

- Left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% on preoperative testing.

- Physically unable or unwilling to pedal a recumbent bicycle.

- Planned aortic valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis.

- Operating surgeon believes that any one of the three protocol bioprosthetic devices is contraindicated based on clinical criteria.

- Not willing to undergo randomization to have implanted one of three bioprosthesis.

- Unwilling or unable to undergo preoperative echocardiography/Doppler for purposes of the research protocol.

- Unwilling or unable to undergo post-operative exercise stress echocardiography/Doppler 5 to 7 months after valve replacement for purposes of the research protocol.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Prevention


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Aortic valve replacement
Clinically indicated aortic valve replacement will be performed using one of three approved tissue valves (Freestyle, Magna Ease, or Trifecta).

Locations

Country Name City State
United States University of Michigan Health Systems Ann Arbor Michigan

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Michigan

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Aortic valve mean gradient (mm Hg) at peak exercise This is a measure of the resistance to flow across the aortic bioprosthesis. 6 months after aortic valve replacement No
Secondary Aortic valve stroke work index This is a measure of the work that the left ventricle does during systole, and incorporates the hemodynamic load of any residual aortic stenosis associated with the implanted bioprosthesis. 6 months after aortic valve replacement No
Secondary Change in LV diastolic strain This is a measure of LV diastolic function (relaxation of the LV), and will include global longitudinal and circumferential early diastolic strain. Up to 4 weeks before valve replacement , 6 months after aortic valve replacement No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03186339 - Validation of the "TASQ" in Patients Undergoing SAVR or TF-TAVI
Recruiting NCT03549559 - Imaging Histone Deacetylase in the Heart N/A
Terminated NCT02854319 - REpositionable Percutaneous Replacement of NatIve StEnotic Aortic Valve Through Implantation of LOTUS EDGE Valve System N/A
Recruiting NCT05601453 - The ReTAVI Prospective Observational Registry
Withdrawn NCT05481814 - CPX in Paradoxical Low Flow Aortic Stenosis
Completed NCT02241109 - Predicting Aortic Stenosis Progression by Measuring Serum Calcification Propensity N/A
Completed NCT01700439 - Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation, Rapid Deployment Surgical Aortic Valve N/A
Recruiting NCT04429035 - SLOW-Slower Progress of caLcificatiOn With Vitamin K2 N/A
Completed NCT04103931 - Impact of a Patient Decision Aid for Treatment of Aortic Stenosis N/A
Completed NCT03950440 - Assessing the Incidence of Postoperative Delirium Following Aortic Valve Replacement
Active, not recruiting NCT02661451 - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement to UNload the Left Ventricle in Patients With ADvanced Heart Failure (TAVR UNLOAD) N/A
Completed NCT02792452 - Clinical Value of Stress Echocardiography in Moderate Aortic Stenosis
Completed NCT02847546 - Evaluation of the BARD® True™ Flow Valvuloplasty Perfusion Catheter for Aortic Valve Dilatation N/A
Completed NCT02758964 - Evaluation of Cerebral Thrombembolism After TAVR
Not yet recruiting NCT02536703 - Safety and Efficacy of Lotus Valve For TAVI In Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis In Chinese Population Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT02541877 - Sizing-sTrategy of Bicuspid AoRtic Valve Stenosis With Transcatheter Self-expandable Valve Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT02221921 - Safety and Efficacy Study of MicroPort's Transcatheter Aortic Valve and Delivery System for TAVI N/A
Completed NCT02249000 - BIOVALVE - I / II Clincial Investigation N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02080299 - Protection by Remote Ischemic Preconditioning During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Phase 2
Terminated NCT01939678 - Characterization and Role of Mutations in Sodium-phosphate Cotransporters in Patients With Calcific Aortic Valve Disease