View clinical trials related to Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Filter by:The issue of valve durability has become one of the most important aspects in the TAVR field in recent years since transcatheter aortic valve replacement has been progressively applied to younger patients with a low co-morbidity burden. The SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve represents the last generation of the SAPIEN valve system and includes several important iterations (newer leaflet calcium-blocking technology targeting calcium-attracting free aldehydes, dry tissue storage, newer skirt textile design) that should translate into a favorable impact on valve durability at mid- to long- term follow-up
The goal of this interventional is to assess advantages of the ultrasound examination of the lungs in the early postoperative period in cardiac surgical patients after heart surgeries requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Evaluation of pulmonary complications and outcomes during mid-term follow-up, as well as comparison of ultrasound examination and traditional roentgenologic methods (X-ray examination and CT of the chest) will be performed. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - Is ultrasound examination of the lungs a more specific and sensitive method in identification of early postoperative pulmonary complications after on-pump cardiac surgical procedures, in comparison with traditional X-ray methods. - Does early identification of interstitial pulmonary edema (based on number of visualised B-lines in the early postoperative period), influences mid-term outcomes in this cohort of patients Participants will undergo ultrasound examination of the lungs on postoperative day 1, 3, 5 and 7 after heart surgery. Based on ultrasound findings and degree of interstitial pulmonary edema, medical (diuretics, anti-inflammatory, e.t.c) therapy will be modified. Researchers will compare this group of patients with control group, in which ultrasound examination will be performed in the same time frames, but no changes in medical management based on ultrasound findings will be made to see if timely administered medical therapy, based on ultrasound findings, can significantly improve symptoms, hospital lengths of stay and outcomes of this patients.
The aim of this prospective registry is to evaluate the clinical impact of the new Navitor prosthesis (Abbott, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in BAV and evaluate both the main sizing methods (the classical annular or the supra-annular with ICD measurement at 4 mm above the virtual basal ring).
Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is the most common valve disease among older individuals. In symptomatic AS, mortality is high, and the only treatment that improves prognosis and survival is transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). TAVI is a growing treatment in Sweden, allowing previously inoperable older patients with AS, who are often frail and have comorbidities, to receive intervention. This results in the need for postoperative cardiac rehabilitation for patients treated with TAVI. Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining the effect of physiotherapist-led exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (PT-X) after TAVI have shown that participation in PT-X can improve physical fitness (the highest measured oxygen uptake (VO2peak)), walking distance, walking speed, and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). However, the included studies are limited, and there is selection bias, resulting in low evidence. Therefore, access to PT-X is currently almost non-existent in Sweden. As more patients undergo TAVI, it is crucial to investigate whether PT-X after TAVI can further improve physical fitness, HR-QoL, and reduce hospital admissions in older individuals with AS. Objective: Primary, to investigate whether participation in PT-X after TAVI can impact physical fitness, physical activity level, and health-related quality of life. Secondary, to study the prevalence of frailty and the number of hospital admissions during the first postoperative year after TAVI. Expected outcome: If patients with AS who have undergone TAVI can improve physical fitness, it could potentially strengthen the evidence and optimize the patient's physical capabilities. Increased access to PT-X and awareness of frailty in these patients could reduce the risk of falls and possibly the number of hospital readmissions. This would decrease healthcare consumption and improve the patient's quality of life.
Background: Some people have a condition in which the wall (septum) that separates the two main pumping chambers of the heart is too thick. This thick septum causes a condition called "left ventricular outflow tract obstruction" (LVOTO), which reduces blood flow out of the heart. LVOTO can cause serious heart disease; symptoms may include shortness of breath, chest pain, heart failure, or death. Researchers want to find better ways to treat LVOTO. Objective: To test a new procedure where excess tissue is sliced away from the septum in people with LVOTO. This procedure is called "septal scoring along midline endocardium" (SESAME). Eligibility: Adults aged 21 years with LVOTO. Design: Participants will have baseline tests. They will have imaging scans and tests of their heart structure and function. They will take a walking test and answer questions about how their heart condition affects their life. Participants will stay in the hospital 2 to 6 days for the SESAME procedure. They will be completely or partially asleep for the procedure. A tube will be inserted into the mouth and down the throat to take pictures of the heart. Pictures may also be taken with a tube inserted inside the heart. Next, tubes will be inserted into the groin and guided through the blood vessels up to the heart. Guidewires will be inserted into the heart. Doctors will watch the path the wires take with x-rays and ultrasound. When the wire is in the correct place, it will be electrified to slice excess tissue away from the septum. Participants will have 3 follow-up visits within 1 year....
There is a lack of data on patients self-reported outcomes (PROMs) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL)and symptoms on anxiety and depression 10 years after Surgical After Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR), and patient reported experiences with the health services (PREMS). In this 10-years follow-up study on patients alive from the study named "The Impact of 24/ 7-phone Support on Readmission After Aortic Valve Replacement, a Randomized Clinical Trial (AVRre)" NCT02522663 we will repeat the survey on symtoms on anxiety and depresion using Hospital Anxiety and depression Scale (HADS), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) and questions about experiences with the health services.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is being offered to younger patients affected by severe aortic stenosis as an alternative to surgery. Although historically excluded from the main randomized clinical trials, patients with native bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) are commonly treated in daily TAVI practice. Indeed, several observational studies reported similar outcomes of TAVI in BAV patients compared to tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients. Notably, BAV is frequently associated with aortic dilatation (20% to 84% of BAV patients). Surgical patients usually undergo concomitant aortic root replacement if aortic diameter exceed 50 mm (5). TAVI patients do not undergo treatment of the concomitant aortopathy, but currently there is a paucity of data regarding the progression of the aortopathy after AS treatment (6,7). The main aim of this ambispective, multicenter study is to evaluate the progression of the bicuspid valve-associated aortopathy in patients undergoing TAVI by computed tomography angiography (CTA) assessment at follow-up.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now the first therapeutic option offered to high and intermediate risk patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis but even to low-risk, when the aortic valve is tricuspid and the transfemoral approach is suitable. Vascular and bleeding complications are the most frequent procedure-related unwanted events associated with increased short-term morbidity and mortality. Selection of the appropriate vascular access site and pre-closing devices as well as stent implantation mitigate these complications. ACT-guided heparin reaching a target of 300 seconds or more is recommended prior to the placement of the guiding sheath in the common femoral artery. Protamine sulfate is the heparin antidote, which antagonizes 100% of its anti-IIa activity and 60% of its anti-Xa activity. Reversal of heparin using protamine sulfate is recommended for transapical and complicated transfemoral aortic valve placement.However, there is a great heterogeneity of protamine use in daily practice and supportive evidence for the prevention of bleeding complications as well as its safety is lacking. In addition, the radial approach for the second vascular access is more commonly used as well as the use of echo-guided femoral puncture further questioning reversal of heparin when the procedure has been successfully completed without overt bleeding complications. Our study aims to demonstrate the superiority of a strategy of systematic ACT-guided heparin administration followed by systematic antagonization with protamine sulfate over usual of care to reduce in-hospital mortality, vascular/bleeding complications, stroke and transcient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction or red blood cell transfusion, from randomization to hospital discharge
A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-Randomized, Single-Arm, Open-Label Continued Access Study of the ShortCut™ device (The ShortCut™ CAS). The continued access study will be used to collect additional safety and effectiveness data of the ShortCut™ device for splitting bioprosthetic aortic valve leaflets, and to demonstrate coronary artery ostia patency following leaflet split, in patients who are at risk for TAVR-induced coronary artery ostium obstruction following a ViV procedure.
SUMMARY: The investigators are planning a clinical study to compare two methods of performing a procedure called TAVI, used in patients with severe aortic stenosis. In this procedure, the aortic valve is replaced in a less invasive way. Traditionally, access through the groin (femoral) is used, but now radial access (through the wrist) is being considered as an alternative. Reasons for the Study: - Currently, there is not enough solid evidence to support the choice between these two accesses. - The investigators want to understand if radial access could be safer and have fewer complications compared to femoral access. What the Investigators Will Measure: - Major complications, such as bleeding or vascular injuries. - Other important outcomes, such as functional recovery and quality of life. How the Investigators Will Do It: - The investigators will randomize patients to receive radial or femoral access. - The investigators will record which type of access is used and assess complications and outcomes. - The investigators will compare the results to understand if there are significant differences between the two groups. Ultimate Goal: - The investigators aim to improve the safety and efficacy of this procedure for patients. - The results of this study will help doctors make informed decisions on how to perform TAVI. Conclusion: - This study is crucial for enhancing care for patients with aortic stenosis and ensuring the procedure is performed in the safest and most effective manner. The results will benefit patients and guide doctors in choosing the best approach for each individual.