Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01213615
Other study ID # Rev B February 4, 2010
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received July 26, 2010
Last updated October 29, 2015
Start date August 2008
Est. completion date May 2014

Study information

Verified date October 2015
Source Medtronic Cardiovascular
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Germany: Ethics CommissionItaly: Ethics CommitteeUnited Kingdom: National Health Service
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Since the first implant in September 1982, the Medtronic Hancock® II has provided more than 20 years of excellent hemodynamic performance and durability. Design improvements over the past generations include: low profile, flexible stent, Supra-X™ supra-annular placement, T6 anti-calcification tissue treatment, modified fixation process, CINCH® advanced implant system and ULTRA™ minimized sewing ring. Valve sizing is a critical consideration in obtaining optimal hemodynamic performance. This is particular true in small aortic roots. A critical issue is the size of the prosthesis in relation to the patient's annulus.

The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate, at six and twelve months, the hemodynamic performance of the HancockÒ Ultra™ bioprosthesis in the aortic position, to analyze the incidence of patient prosthesis mismatch, correlation of gradients, and to ascertain frequency at which a larger valve size is used vs. a patient's debrided annulus diameter.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 179
Est. completion date May 2014
Est. primary completion date October 2013
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients who require aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass grafting or surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation or mitral valve repair.

- Patients who are able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Concomitant procedures other than coronary artery bypass grafting, surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation or mitral valve repair.

- Patients indicated for receiving a mechanical prosthesis.

- Patients who will have a replacement of existing valve prosthesis.

- Patients refusing or not able to provide informed consent.

- Patients requiring emergency surgery.

- Patients unable to participate in follow-up

Study Design

Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Prospective


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Valve replacement
Aortic valve replacement of Hancock II Ultra porcine bioprosthesis

Locations

Country Name City State
Belgium Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Brussels
Italy Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano Caserta
Italy Azienda Universitaria S. Maria della Misericordia Udine
Netherlands Leiden University Medical Center Leiden
United Kingdom The Cardiothoracic Centre Liverpool NHS Trust Liverpool

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Medtronic Bakken Research Center

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium,  Italy,  Netherlands,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The primary objective of the study is the hemodynamic performance of the bioprosthesis at 6 and 12 months after surgery. This will be measured by comparing the mean aortic valve gradients pre- and post-surgery.Left ventricular mass regression will be compared pre operative and at 6 months follow-up. The follow-up data at 12 months will be used to see if there was any improvement with the 6 months follow-up visit. . 6 and 12 months after surgery No
Secondary The secondary objective of the study is the incidence of patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM). This is measured by collecting valve sizing data during implant and the ultimate valve sizes used for implant 5 to 15 days post procedure No