Aortic Dissection Clinical Trial
— ARISEIIOfficial title:
Evaluation of the GORE® Ascending Stent Graft in the Treatment of Lesions of the Ascending Aorta
Verified date | April 2024 |
Source | W.L.Gore & Associates |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The primary objective of ARISE II is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the GORE® Ascending Stent Graft device in the treatment of lesions involving the ascending aorta and aortic arch.
Status | Enrolling by invitation |
Enrollment | 370 |
Est. completion date | January 2034 |
Est. primary completion date | October 2029 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: ASG Device Alone Arm The patient is/has: 1. Ascending Aortic pathologies warranting surgical repair compatible with the treatment requirements of the ASG device meeting any of the following criteria: Aneurysm 1. Fusiform aneurysm (=50mm or documented growth rate >0.5cm/year) 2. Saccular aneurysm (no diameter criteria) 3. Pseudoaneurysms (>30 days post-surgery, no diameter criteria) Non-aneurysm 4. Penetrating Aortic Ulcers (PAUs) (no diameter criteria) 5. Pseudoaneurysms, following open surgical repair of a Type A dissection (>30 days post-surgery, no diameter criteria) 2. Anatomic compatibility with ASG device based on Gore Imaging Sciences review. 1. Treatment must be limited to the ascending aorta 2. Lesion location is =2cm distal to the most distal coronary artery ostia 3. Distal extent of the lesion is located =2cm proximal to the origin of the Brachiocephalic Artery (BCA) 4. Proximal and distal landing zones must be =2cm in length 5. Landing zones cannot be heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed 6. Landing zone diameter between 27mm - 48mm 7. For patients with prior replacement of the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch by an endovascular or surgical graft, there must be at least =2 cm overlap of ASG device and previously implanted graft. 3. Considered high-risk for open surgical repair by meeting any of the following criteria: 1. =75 years of age 2. Previous median sternotomy 3. Documented identification of other subject-specific risk factors (e.g., medical history, active medical diagnosis) by a study investigator and an experienced open ascending and/or aortic arch surgeon (e.g., cardiothoracic surgeon). 4. Age =18 years at time of informed consent signature 5. Adequate vascular access via transfemoral or retroperitoneal approach 6. Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed by the subject or legally authorized representative 7. Agrees to comply with protocol requirements, including imaging and 5-year follow-up Exclusion Criteria: ASG Device Alone Arm The patient is/has: 1. De novo Type A dissection 2. Requires immediate treatment 3. Dissected great vessels requiring treatment 4. Anticipated need for coronary or aortic valve intervention within one year post treatment 5. Any aortic valve repair or replacement including transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or coronary artery intervention within 30 days prior to treatment 6. Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or treatment for acute coronary syndrome requiring Dual Anti Platelet Therapy (DAPT) within 30 days prior to treatment 7. Open chest surgical repair within 30 days prior to treatment 8. Presence of Intramural Hematoma (IMH) in landing zones 9. Prosthetic heart valve in the aortic position that precludes safe delivery of the ASG device 10. Aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater 11. Previous endovascular repair with a non-Gore device that would interfere with or result in contact with planned repair 12. Concomitant vascular disease requiring treatment that is not planned for index endovascular procedure 13. Any stroke or myocardial infarction within 6 weeks prior to treatment 14. Presence of protruding and/or irregular thrombus and/or atheroma in the ascending aorta or aortic arch or any other factor that could increase the risk of stroke based on Gore Imaging Sciences review 15. Known degenerative connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan's or Ehler-Danlos Syndrome, EDS) 16. Participation in investigational drug or medical device study within one year of enrollment unless approved by the sponsor 17. Known history of drug abuse within one year of treatment 18. Pregnant at time of procedure 19. Active infected aorta, mycotic aneurysm 20. Active systemic infection (e.g., infection requiring treatment with parenteral anti-infective medication) 21. Renal failure, defined as patients with an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) <30 (mL/min/1.73 m2) or currently requiring dialysis 22. Life expectancy <12 months 23. Known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials 24. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulants or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment 25. Body habitus or other medical condition which prevents adequate fluoroscopic and CT visualization of the aorta Inclusion Criteria: ASG + TBE Device Arm The patient is/has: 1. Ascending and/or Arch Aortic pathologies warranting surgical repair compatible with the treatment requirements of the ASG device and meeting any of the following criteria: Aneurysms 1. Fusiform aneurysm (=55 mm or documented growth rate >0.5cm/year) 2. Saccular aneurysm (no diameter criteria) 3. Pseudoaneurysms (>30 days post-surgery, no diameter criteria) Non-aneurysms 4. Penetrating Aortic Ulcers (no diameter criteria) 5. Pseudoaneurysms, following open surgical repair of a Type A dissection (>30 days post-surgery, no diameter criteria) 6. Chronic de novo (>90 days) Type A aortic dissection requiring treatment - Chronic de novo aortic dissection with primary entry tear in the ascending aorta or arch - Chronic de novo aortic dissection with primary entry tear in the descending thoracic aorta with retrograde involvement of the aortic arch and/or ascending aorta 7. Residual aortic dissection following surgical repair of Type A aortic dissection requiring treatment (>30 days post-surgery) 2. Anatomic compatibility with ASG device used in combination with the TBE Device based on Gore Imaging Sciences review. Proximal Aortic Landing Zone: 1. Landing zone is native aorta or surgical graft 2. Lesion location is =2cm distal to the most distal coronary artery ostia 3. Proximal landing zone must be =2cm in the ascending aorta. 4. Landing zone cannot be aneurysmal, heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed 5. Landing zone diameter between 27mm - 48mm 6. Acceptable proximal landing zone outer curvature length for the required device Branch Vessel Landing Zone: 1. Length of =2.5 cm proximal to first major branch vessel 2. Target branch vessel inner diameters of 11-18 mm 3. Target branch vessel landing zone must be in native vessel that cannot be heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed Distal Aortic Landing Zone: 1. Outer curvature must be =2 cm proximal to the celiac artery 2. Aortic inner diameters between 16-42 mm 3. Landing zone in native aorta or previously implanted GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft (CTAG Device) 3. Considered high-risk for open surgical repair by meeting any of the following criteria: 1. =75 years of age 2. Previous median sternotomy 3. Documented identification of other subject-specific risk factors (e.g., medical history, active medical diagnosis) by a study investigator and an experienced open ascending and/or aortic arch surgeon (e.g., cardiothoracic surgeon). 4. Age =18 years at time of informed consent signature 5. Adequate vascular access via transfemoral or retroperitoneal approach 6. Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed by the subject or legally authorized representative 7. Agrees to comply with protocol requirements, including imaging and 5-year follow-up Exclusion Criteria: ASG + TBE Device Arm The patient is/has: 1. Acute and subacute de novo Type A dissection (defined as <90 days) 2. Requires immediate treatment 3. Dissected great vessels requiring treatment 4. Anticipated need for coronary or aortic valve intervention within one year post treatment 5. Any aortic valve repair or replacement including transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or coronary artery intervention within 30 days prior to treatment 6. Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or treatment for acute coronary syndrome requiring Dual Anti Platelet Therapy (DAPT) within 30 days prior to treatment. 7. Open chest surgical repair within 30 days prior to treatment 8. Presence of Intramural Hematoma (IMH) in landing zones 9. Prosthetic heart valve in the aortic position that precludes safe delivery of the ASG device 10. Aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater. 11. Previous endovascular repair with a non-Gore device that would interfere with or result in contact with planned repair 12. Concomitant vascular disease requiring treatment that is not planned for index endovascular procedure 13. Any stroke or myocardial infarction within 6 weeks prior to treatment 14. Presence of protruding and/or irregular thrombus and/or atheroma in the ascending aorta or aortic arch or any other factor that could increase the risk of stroke based on Gore Imaging Sciences review. 15. Known degenerative connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan Syndrome or Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, EDS) 16. Participation in investigational drug or medical device study within one year of enrollment unless approved by the sponsor 17. Known history of drug abuse within one year of treatment 18. Pregnant at time of procedure 19. Active infected aorta, mycotic aneurysm 20. Active systemic infection (e.g., infection requiring treatment with parenteral anti-infective medication) 21. Renal failure, defined as patients with an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) <30 (mL/min/1.73 m2) or currently requiring dialysis 22. Life expectancy <12 months 23. Known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials 24. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulants or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment 25. Body habitus or other medical condition which prevents adequate fluoroscopic and CT visualization of the aorta 26. Previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type 2 (HIT-2) or known hypersensitivity to heparin or a history of a hypercoagulability disorder and/or state Inclusion Criteria: Surgical Follow-up Cohort Subjects who meet the following criteria will be followed: 1. The aortic lesion involves the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch 2. The subject is determined to be high-risk for open surgical repair per the protocol requirements 3. The subject is at least 18 years of age 4. The subject is willing to comply with the protocol requirements 5. Open surgery to repair the aortic lesion the patient was screened for is intended to be performed at the investigational site responsible for initiating the screening process for the study |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | University of Michigan Frankel Cardiovascular Center | Ann Arbor | Michigan |
United States | Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons | Austin | Texas |
United States | University of Maryland Medical Center | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Northwestern University -Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Clinical Trials Unit | Chicago | Illinois |
United States | Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | Duke University Medical Center | Durham | North Carolina |
United States | Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center | Houston | Texas |
United States | Keck Medical Center University of Southern California, HCC II | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Sentara Mid Atlantic Cardiothoracic Surgeons | Norfolk | Virginia |
United States | University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | The Heart Hospital at Baylor Plano | Plano | Texas |
United States | Stanford Hospital | Stanford | California |
United States | MedStar Washington Hospital Center | Washington | District of Columbia |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
W.L.Gore & Associates |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Primary effectiveness endpoint as measured by device technical success and absence of reintervention. | The primary effectiveness endpoint is a composite of the following events through one month post procedure: Device Technical Success and Absence of Reintervention.
Technical Success is defined as including: Successful access and delivery to the intended implantation site, and retrieval of the device delivery system, and; Accurate placement of the device at the intended implantation site, and Patency of the graft in absence of clinically significant device deformations (e.g., kinking, stent eversion, mal-deployment, misaligned deployment), and Absence of reintervention is defined as: The absence of unanticipated additional procedures related to the device, procedure, or withdrawal of the delivery system |
30 Days | |
Primary | Primary Safety Endpoint as measured by a composite of the absence of aortic rupture, lesion-related mortality, disabling stroke, permanent paraplegia, permanent paraparesis, and new onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis. | The primary safety endpoint is a composite of the following events through 30 days post endovascular procedure:
Aortic rupture Lesion-related mortality Disabling Stroke Permanent paraplegia Permanent paraparesis New onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis |
30 Days | |
Secondary | Secondary endpoints as measured as a composite of procedural and treatment success. | Two secondary endpoints are planned for the study with no inferential analysis. Composite endpoint of procedural success elements measured at one month follow-up Composite endpoint of treatment success elements measured at all appropriate follow-up windows | 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months | |
Secondary | Secondary endpoint as measured by Short Form-36® physical component summary (PCS) | Short Form-36® PCS measured at the one year follow-up visit with inferential analysis | 12 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05582967 -
The DAShED (Diagnosis of Aortic Syndrome in the ED) Study
|
||
Terminated |
NCT04116684 -
Digital Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Type B Aortic Dissection Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02086136 -
Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D-dimer in Suspected Acute Aortic Dissection
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02201589 -
Feasibility of Endovascular Repair Of Ascending Aortic Pathologies
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03948555 -
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Aortic Dissection to Visualise Inflammation
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05912608 -
Optimal Strategy for Repair of Type A Acute Aortic Dissection
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03707743 -
Registry of Patients With Acute/Subacute Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by Means of the STABILISE Technique (STABILISE)
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT00583817 -
Endovascular Treatment of Thoracic Aortic Disease
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05073991 -
Incidence of Mortality and Complications After Lung Surgery, Open Thoracic Aortic Repair, TEVAR, EVAR.
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02523300 -
Glucocorticoid on the Prognosis of TEVAR
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01197651 -
Aortic-Stent-Register
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04471909 -
NEXUS Aortic Arch Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06044259 -
Study Comparing Hemiarch Replacement and Hemiarch Plus Stent Implantation in Acute Aortic Dissection
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05039814 -
Prediction of Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Using Cystatin C
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03780738 -
A Validation Study of The Relationship Between ALDH2 and Aortic Dissection
|
||
Completed |
NCT03647566 -
18F Sodium Fluoride PET/CT in Acute Aortic Syndrome
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03347812 -
Clinical Study for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05044494 -
Surgery for Delay-recognized or Defer-operated Type A Aortic Dissection
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02958098 -
My Research Legacy Pilot Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04450433 -
Functional Study of Metabolites in Patients With Aortic Dissection
|