Clinical Trials Logo

Anticoagulation clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Anticoagulation.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01124058 Completed - Anticoagulation Clinical Trials

Evaluation of Maintenance Dosing vs Loading Dosing Upon Restarting Warfarin Therapy: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Start date: July 2010
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

A prospective, randomized trial to compare the time taken to achieve a therapeutic INR upon re-starting warfarin at a "loading" dose (namely 1.5 times the "maintenance" dose for 3 days) compared to the known "maintenance" dose.

NCT ID: NCT00329290 Completed - Pregnancy Clinical Trials

Evaluation of Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Pregnancies in Women With Prosthetic Heart Valves

Start date: February 2002
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The ability to diagnose and surgically repair poorly functioning heart valves has yielded a significant population of women that are of childbearing age with mechanical/ bioprosthetic heart valves. The clinical management of pregnant women with artificial heart valves during pregnancy has been difficult. Currently there have not been any controlled clinical trials to provide guidelines for a safe and effective anticoagulation. Current review of the literature has shown that oral anticoagulation with warfarin has been implicated to cause significant fetal morbidity including prematurity, decreased birth weight, birth defects (i.e.:"warfarin embryopathy"), abortions, still birth and neonatal mortality. Warfarin embryopathy refers to characteristic anomalies (nasal hypoplasia, eye defects, hypoplasia of extremities, deafness, mental and developmental retardation), that may occur when coumadin is used during first trimester and/or if used in doses >5mg per day during pregnancy. It has also been reported that intravenous and subcutaneous heparin has not been sufficiently effective in lowering maternal morbidity and mortality. Thromboembolic events, valve dysfunction leading to peripartum valve replacements, and maternal death have all been observed. The purpose of this study is to: - Evaluate the outcome of pregnancy in women with mechanical/bioprosthetic heart valves. - Identify the risks posed to both mother and fetus during treatment with various methods of anticoagulation during pregnancy. The survey will be conducted in three phases: Physicians who respond to: Phase 1: A questionnaire asking physicians whether they have cared for a patient with prosthetic heart valve after year 1990 will be mailed, faxed or e-mailed to all members of the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine. Phase 2: Responding physicians will provide information for the investigators to contact their patients and obtain a telephone/signed consent form (approved by the LBMMC IRB) to participate in the study and release their medical records to the investigators. Phase 3: Data will be collected by the investigators/research nurse by reviewing medical records and interviewing referring physicians and the patients. Although the information may not have immediate benefit to the subject, the data collected may help the medical community develop a more effective guideline of selection of prosthetic valves in women in the childbearing age and care of patients with prosthetic heart valves during pregnancy.

NCT ID: NCT00205400 Completed - Thromboembolism Clinical Trials

Comparison of Patient Outcomes Using Different Delivery Models of Anticoagulation Care

Start date: August 1999
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Hypothesis: Does the time spent within the target INR range differ when patients are managed by AMD or IT models of anticoagulation care? Experimental Design: The 36-month trial enrolled 192 eligible patients currently receiving chronic warfarin therapy at the William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital. Consenting patients are enrolled and randomized to 1 of 2 groups: usual clinic care with face-to-face visits every 4 weeks (AMS model) or clinic visits every 3 months with interim laboratory visits and telephone follow-up every 4 weeks (IT model). At study conclusion, the amount of time the INR is within target range will be compared between the two groups. Thromboembolic and bleeding event rates, patient knowledge, quality of life and healthcare utilization will also be analyzed.