View clinical trials related to Antibiotic Prophylaxis.
Filter by:Effect of single dose & intrapocket prophylactic antibiotic to cardiac implantable electronic device-related infection & biomarkers
In this biological study, we will evaluate the levels of breast milk IgA, neonatal fecal IgA, and the composition of breast milk and fecal microbiota throughout the first 12 months of life in neonates born to mothers treated or not treated with prenatal antibiotics for at least 7 days after the 32nd weeks of gestation
The goal of this prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomized clinical trial is to compare intermittent cefoxitin administration to loading bolus followed by continuous infusion for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery. The main objective is to demonstrate the superiority of a loading dose of cefoxitin followed by continuous infusion over standard of care boluses in reducing SSI within 30 days after colorectal surgery
This study aims to determine the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotic use for TACE and occurrence of postoperative liver abscess. There would be two comparison groups. Current standard of care treatment at PKLI&RC (as per local guidelines) would be given to all patients receiving TACE for the intervention group or 'antibiotic group' (i.e., Inj. Ceftriaxone 1g, intravenous × stat). While no antibiotic would be given to the 'no antibiotic group'.
The objective of antibiotic prophylaxis is to prevent bacterial proliferation in order to reduce the risk of postoperative infection. Numerous recent recommendations show a benefit of a reduced duration of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery, particularly in pediatrics. The study focuses on the incidence of postoperative infection by comparing antibiotic prophylaxis with 2nd generation cephalosporin (G2G) for 48 hours to a short antibiotic prophylaxis protocol limited to 24 hours. The bacterial infections considered were those said to be care-related, according to the criteria of the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care if they occurred within the 3 months postoperative interval and were not present before the surgery: - sepsis - superficial or deep surgical site infection (mediastinitis, sternitis, scar infection) - catheterization infection, - urinary tract infection or - respiratory infection such as pneumopathy acquired under mechanical ventilation The hypothesis is that reducing the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis does not expose patients to an increased risk of infection and limits exposure to antibiotics
After a surgical operation patients may have an infection in the operation wound, the bladder, kidneys or lungs. To stop these infections patients are given a dose of antibiotic before their operation. Unfortunately, the amount of antibiotic available to fight infections falls throughout an operation, being removed from the body by the kidneys. Therefore, antibiotic levels may not be high enough to stop infections. A way of maintaining antibiotic levels throughout an operation is to give a single dose of antibiotic and then a constant amount of antibiotic by an infusion from the start to the end of the operation. A small single centre test study was previosuly undertaken into antibiotic dosing during bowel operations. One group of patients had a single dose of antibiotic before their operation. The other group had a single dose plus a constant dose of antibiotic until the end of their operation. The project showed patients were happy to take part and that the study was safe. The study helped us identify the correct amounts of antibiotic needed for the patients given the single dose plus a constant dose of antibiotic. This study was conducted at one hospital only, and wasn't big enough to confirm if one treatment was better than another or if results would be similar in other hospitals. This study will build on the pilot study in a larger feasibility trial, the Colo-Pro_2 trial. It will be run in three hospitals so can assess if the trial design works at different hospitals. We will see if the results suggest one treatment, single dose of antibiotics before an operation, or single dose plus a constant dose of antibiotics throughout an operation, is better. This study will include up to 180 patients having bowel operations as they have a high risk of infection. All patients will be given the same antibiotic which is called cefuroxime. Cefuroxime is already used to stop infections after surgery. Using the same antibiotic in all patients means it is possible to know if differences in the number of infections are due to how the antibiotic is given. The number of infections that happen up to 30 days after operations will be counted. Staff looking after patients after the operation and those counting the infections will not know, unless necessary, the treatment patients received. This means the results won't be influenced by knowledge of the treatment received.
Anesthesia and surgical guidelines recommend the administration of a surgical antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing "clean" surgery. The prescribed antibiotic should target the bacteria most commonly found in surgical site infections (SSIs) and the duration of administration should not exceed 24 hours to minimize the ecological risk of bacterial resistance emergence. Guidelines provide a framework for the administration of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis but their effectiveness is regularly re-evaluated by measuring the rates of SSIs and the microorganisms responsible for infectious complications after surgery. The majority of interventions required the use of first or second generation cephalosporins as surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. For patients with allergy to beta-lactams, clindamycin and vancomycin are proposed as alternatives. In the patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) colonization or if those at risk of developing MRSA-associated SSI (hospital ecology, previous antibiotic treatment), only vancomycin is recommended. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics is complex and its tissue absorption varies according to the level of tissue inflammation. This is a difficult molecule to handle, exclusively administered via intravenous route. Linezolid is a synthetic antibiotic from the oxazolidinone class. By binding to the rRNA on the 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits, it inhibits the bacterial synthesis. It is therefore a bacteriostatic antibiotic approved for the treatment of both methicillin susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA infections. It also covers a broad spectrum of Gram positive bacteria. Its pharmacokinetics allows rapid intravenous infusion, with rapid penetration into bone and soft tissue of the surgical site during hip surgery. A large Cochrane meta-analysis reported that linezolid was superior to vancomycin in skin infections, including MRSA infections, albeit with low quality evidence. We therefore hypothesized that linezolid can be used instead of vancomycin for beta-lactam allergic patients and patients at risk of MRSA-associated SSI in general surgery.
This study aims to show that lack of antibiotic prophylaxis to those undergoing bladder Botox injections is not significantly inferior to administering prophylaxis. By proving this, the investigators aim to decrease antibiotic use in this setting to combat the growing issue of antibiotic resistance. Participants will be randomized to antibiotic or no treatment arm. Those randomized to the treatment arm will receive oral antibiotics for 2 days pre-treatment, on the treatment day, and 2 days post-treatment. Participants will return for a follow up appointment approximately 2 weeks after treatment to assess for urinary tract infection (UTI) symptoms. They will be called again at 6 weeks for follow up.
The current practice of pre-VCUG antibiotic prophylaxis is highly variable. A recent unpublished survey of Society of Fetal Urologists (SFU) completed by this study team found that 87% of respondents reported having patients who develop fUTI following VCUG, with 30% of respondents prophylaxing for fUTI in patients undergoing VCUG. The current lack of best practice guidelines regarding antibiotic prophylaxis prior to VCUG due to low quality of current literature, and a growing concern around risks of unnecessary antibiotic exposure suggests the need for an RCT. The results of this pilot trial will inform the ability to conduct a definitive RCT on this important subject. The results of the definitive trial would have important clinical and economic implications.
This study describes Cefazolin pharmacokinetics variation to target levels during liver transplantation.