Ankylosing Spondylitis Clinical Trial
Official title:
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Extension Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Jaktinib in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis(AS)
The purpose of this study is to determine if Jaktinib is safe and effective in participants with active ankylosing spondylitis.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 258 |
Est. completion date | December 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - The investigators concluded that the participants continued to benefit from treatment with Jaktinib. - The participants have been fully informed and voluntarily signed informed consent. - The participants completed the ZGJAK029 study for 16 weeks of treatment and visitation and had good compliance. - The interval between the participants' first dose and the last dose of ZGJAK029 = 4 weeks. Exclusion Criteria: - There were any grade =3 adverse events within 4 weeks prior to enrollment and no return to grade 1 or normal. - Within 4 weeks prior to enrollment, participants had the following infectious diseases: tuberculosis infection requiring treatment; HIV-positive, syphilis, HBV infection, HCV infection. - The investigators considered participants unsuitable for this study. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | Renji Hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Suzhou Zelgen Biopharmaceuticals Co.,Ltd |
China,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Related Discontinuations at 32 Weeks | Treatment-emergent AEs were events that occurred between first dose of study drug and up to 32 weeks that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. | Baseline up to Week 32 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving ASAS20 Response at Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32 | ASAS20 assess 4 domains: PGA of Disease (assess disease activity on a scale of 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], high score=more disease activity), total back pain (scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], high score=more severity), Function (BASFI; participant's level of ability on scale of 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible], low score= better functional health) and Inflammation (morning stiffness, Mean of Q5 and Q6 of BASDAI defined as 6-item questionnaire measure disease activity on a scale of 0 [none] to 10 [severe], high score=more disease activity). ASAS20 response: >= 20% improvement from baseline in disease activity and absolute change of >=1 unit in >=3 domains and no worsening of >=20% and an absolute change of >=1 unit in remaining domain. | Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving ASAS40 Response at Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32 | ASAS40 assessed 4 domains: the "PGA" (assess disease activity on a scale of 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=more disease activity), total back pain (on a scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score=more severity), Function (from BASFI: assess participant's level of ability on a scale of 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible], lower scores= better functional health) and Inflammation (morning stiffness, Mean of Q5 and Q6 of BASDAI defined as 6 item questionnaire: measures disease activity on a scale of 0 [none] to 10 [severe], higher score=more disease activity). ASAS40 response: >=40% and >=2 units improvement in >=3 domains and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. | Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Spinal Pain: Total Back Pain at Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32 | Participants marked their level of total back pain on a numerical rating scale (NRS) ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain), with higher scores indicated more severe pain. | Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving ASAS 5/6 Response at Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32 | ASAS 5/6 consists of 6 domains: 4 used in ASAS20 - PGA (assess disease activity on a scale of 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=more disease activity), Spinal Pain (total back pain) (on a scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score=more severity), Function (using BASFI which assess participant's level of ability on a scale of 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible], lower scores= better functional health) and Inflammation (using BASDAI, mean of Q 5 and 6, which assess disease activity on a scale of 0 [none] to 10 [severe], higher score=more disease activity), CRP (was measured in mg per liter) and Spinal mobility was measured in centimeter and calculated as mean of right and left measurements of lateral spinal flexion from BASMI. ASAS 5/6: defined as >=20% improvement in at least 5 domains. | Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16,20,24,28 and 32 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT02685904 -
A Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ENIA11 in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02186873 -
A Study of Golimumab in Participants With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01668004 -
The Incidence of Extra-Articular Manifestations in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis Treated With Golimumab (MK-8259-012)
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05051943 -
A Study of the Real-world Use of an Adalimumab Biosimilar and Evaluation of Nutritional Status on the Therapeutic Response
|
||
Completed |
NCT01934933 -
Etanercept and Celecoxib Alone/Combined Treatment in Effectiveness and Safety of Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04875299 -
Optimal Adalimumab Plasma Concentrations in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT02758782 -
NSAIDs Added to Anti-TNF Therapy Versus Anti-TNF Therapy Alone on Progression of Structural Damage in Ankylosing Spondylitis
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02763111 -
Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Subcutaneous Injections of Various Doses of BCD-085 in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02687620 -
Does Immunogenicity Have an Influence on the Efficacy of Anti-TNF Therapy in Patients With AS: An Inception Cohort Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT02154425 -
A Multicenter, Postmarketing Study Evaluating the Concentration of Cimzia® in Mature Breast Milk of Lactating Mothers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01750528 -
Prevalence and Progression of Periodontitis in Ankylosing Spondylitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01463189 -
Web-based Support to Manage Arthritis Pain
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01091675 -
Assessment of the Response to Etoricoxib in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis and Inadequate Response to ≥2 NSAIDs
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00844805 -
Infliximab for Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis (P05336 AM1)
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00747578 -
Health-Related Quality of Life and Disease-Related Costs: Comparison Between Ankylosing Spondylitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Taiwan
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01083693 -
Quality of Life Outcomes of HUMIRA in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) After Unsustainable Response to Biologicals and Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00715091 -
Effects of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) on RAdiographic Damage in Ankylosing Spondylitis
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT00517101 -
Presence of IBD Specific Antibodies (ASCA, ALCA, ACCA, AMCA) in the Sera of Patients With Spondyloarthropathy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00367211 -
Study to Evaluate the Incidence of Gastric Ulcers Following Administration of Either PN 200 or Naproxen in Subjects Who Are at Risk for Developing NSAID-Associated Ulcers.
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00133315 -
TNFalfa Blocking Treatment of Spondylarthropathies
|
Phase 4 |