Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06052657 |
Other study ID # |
REC-UOL-506-08-2023 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
December 21, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
August 25, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
September 2023 |
Source |
University of Lahore |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Functional instability should be considered as a potential cause of residual ankle impairment
and instability. Even if neuromuscular anomalies are detected, the precise cause of injury
and the most efficient prevention strategies remain uncertain. The use of standardized and
validated research instruments is strongly advocated. This is due in part to the idea that it
allows for international and cross-national comparison of results. Another assumption is that
utilizing validated tools increases confidence that they are measuring what they are intended
to measure. However, a previously validated tool does not guarantee its applicability in a
new period, culture, or setting. The rationale of study is to provide a valid and reliable
tool translated into native language of Urdu speaking populations so that self-evaluation of
ankle instability can be assessed and re-assessed over the time. The questionnaire is
translated into various languages including; French, Japanese, Brazilian, Persian, Thai,
Malay, Greek, Chinese, Korean, Turkish and Spanish; whereas, Pakistani Urdu version has not
yet studied. The present study fills this literature gap and serves a large proportion of
Urdu community around the globe; specially, Pakistan. By measuring the psychometric
properties of this scale in Urdu version, quantitatively strengthens up the evidence and
patients themselves can report their exact level of disorder by answering a set of questions
in their own language.
Description:
Functional instability should be considered as a potential cause of residual ankle impairment
and instability. Even if neuromuscular anomalies are detected, the precise cause of injury
and the most efficient prevention strategies remain uncertain. The use of standardized and
validated research instruments is strongly advocated. This is due in part to the idea that it
allows for international and cross-national comparison of results. Another assumption is that
utilizing validated tools increases confidence that they are measuring what they are intended
to measure. However, a previously validated tool does not guarantee its applicability in a
new period, culture, or setting. The rationale of study is to provide a valid and reliable
tool translated into native language of Urdu speaking populations so that self-evaluation of
ankle instability can be assessed and re-assessed over the time. The questionnaire is
translated into various languages including; French, Japanese, Brazilian, Persian, Thai,
Malay, Greek, Chinese, Korean, Turkish and Spanish; whereas, Pakistani Urdu version has not
yet studied. The present study fills this literature gap and serves a large proportion of
Urdu community around the globe; specially, Pakistan. By measuring the psychometric
properties of this scale in Urdu version, quantitatively strengthens up the evidence and
patients themselves can report their exact level of disorder by answering a set of questions
in their own language.
For this purpose, the research conducted was a Cross-Sectional Validation Study involving 100
patients who had experienced ankle sprains. This study took place at the Department of
Physical Therapy within the University of Lahore Teaching Hospital, situated on Defence Road
in Lahore, spanning a nine-month duration following synopsis approval. The researchers
employed a purposive sampling technique. Inclusion criteria encompassed individuals aged 18
and above, of both genders, diagnosed with ankle instability, and who had suffered from an
ankle sprain for at least one month without receiving medical or physical therapy
intervention during the study. Exclusions were made for participants displaying rheumatic or
arthritic degenerative changes, those with a history of traumatic incidents like road
accidents, individuals who had undergone lower extremity surgery, and participants with a
current history of cancer. Ethical considerations were met as all participants provided
written informed consent, and approval was obtained from the University of Lahore's Ethics
Committee. Data collection involved using the translated Urdu version of Identification of
Functional Ankle Instability Questionnaire Urdu Version (IDFAI-U).