Ankle Sprain Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy of Pain Relief of Topical Indomethacin Patch Over Placebo in Ankle Sprain Patients
Verified date | April 2015 |
Source | GlaxoSmithKline |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | China: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
This study will investigate the efficacy of the Indomethacin patch in pain relief of ankle sprain in adult patients, compared to a placebo patch
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 270 |
Est. completion date | September 2014 |
Est. primary completion date | September 2014 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Participant with Grade I or Grade II acute sprain of the lateral ankle within 24 hours before screening visit - Participant with self-assessed pain intensity score after movement (5 steps) at the site of the ankle sprain that is >= 5 as measured on a 0-10 NRS rating. - Participant with a peri-malleolar edema (sub-malleolar perimeter difference of >=20mm between injured and uninjured ankle) Exclusion Criteria: - Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients. - Participant who had medication that could interfere with the subject's perception of pain since experiencing ankle sprain. - Pregnancy , Breast Feeding and Substance Abuse |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital | Changzhou | Jiangsu |
China | Changzhou NO.2 People?s Hospital | Changzhou | Jiangsu |
China | Zhongda Hospital Southeast University | Nanjing | Jiangsu |
China | Ruijin Hospital Luwan Branch | Shanghai | Shanghai |
China | Shanghai East Hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai |
China | Shanghai First People's Hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai |
China | Shanghai First People?s Hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai |
China | Shanghai First Peoples Hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai |
China | Shanghai Ruijin Hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai |
China | Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai |
China | Shanghai Tenth People?s Hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai |
China | Shanghai Tenth Peoples Hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai |
China | Shanghai Xuhui Centre Hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai |
China | Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine | Shanghai | Shanghai |
China | The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University | Suzhou | Jiangsu |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
GlaxoSmithKline | Rundo International Pharmaceutical Research & Development Co.,Ltd. |
China,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)1-3 Days | SPID was calculated as sum of products of Pain Intensity Differences (PID) at a given time-point (t) with the time-interval from that time-point to the previous time-point (t-1). The time-intervals used were 0 hrs (Day 1, pre treatment), 0.5 hrs, 1 hr, 2 hrs, 4 hrs, 8 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs and 48 hrs. Positive and higher scores indicate greater reduction in pain. SPIDt = ?PID x (time t - time t-1). Pain Intensity was assessed at baseline and at each time-point based on numerical rating scale (NRS) which is a horizontal line with a scale from 0-10, where 0 represents "No" and 10 represents the "worst possible pain" |
Baseline (Day 1) to Day 3 | No |
Secondary | Pain Relief Score (PRS) on Movement Over Time | PRS was assessed for pain on movement (walking 5 steps on flat surface) at 30, 60 minutes and 2, 4, 8 and 12 hrs after the first dose of treatment (indomethacin or placebo patch) and twice daily during the period from 12 hours to 24 hr, 36 hr, 48 hr, 60 hr, 72 hr, 84 hr, 96 hr, 108 hr, 120 hr, 132 hr and 144 hr between treatment groups. Participants were asked to choose a number on a scale of 0 to 4, where, 0- No pain relief; 1- A little or perceptible pain relief; 2- Meaningful pain relief; 3- A lot of relief; 4- Complete relief. The mean PRS scores were calculated on the basis of participant's response based on the above score. |
30 minutes (mins) to 144 hours (hrs) post treatment | No |
Secondary | NRS for Pain on Movement Over Time | NRS was assessed for pain on movement (walking 5 steps on flat surface) at 30, 60 minutes and 2, 4, 8 and 12 hrs after the first dose of treatment (indomethacin or placebo patch) and twice daily during the period from 12 hours to 24 hr, 36 hr, 48 hr, 60 hr, 72 hr, 84 hr, 96 hr, 108 hr, 120 hr, 132 hr and 144 hr between treatment groups. The NRS is a horizontal line with a scale from 0-10. After application of patch (indomethacin or reference patch), patients were asked to choose a number that relates to their pain intensity on the scale of 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain. |
30 mins to 144 hr post treatment | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in NRS at Rest | Mean changes in pain intensity at each time point at rest twice daily (in the morning and afternoon) from treatment day 1 to day 7 between treatment groups at time points 0.5 hrs, 1 hr, 2 hrs, 4 hrs, 8 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs, 48 hrs, 60 hrs, 72 hrs, 84 hrs, 96 hrs, 108 hrs, 120 hrs, 132 hrs and 144 hrs was measured using NRS. The NRS is a horizontal line with a scale from 0-10. After application of patch (indomethacin or reference patch), participants were asked to choose a number that relates to their pain intensity on the scale of 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain. | Baseline (Day 1) to Day 7 | No |
Secondary | Time to Onset of Pain Relief | Time to onset of pain relief was measured by the time to reach a pain relief score of "1" ("A little or perceptible pain relief"). | Baseline (Day 1) to Day 3 | No |
Secondary | Assessment of Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) on Movement | SPID was calculated as sum of products of Pain Intensity Differences (PID) at a given time-point (t) with the time-interval from that time-point to the previous time-point (t-1). The time-intervals used were 0 hrs (Day 1, pre treatment), 0.5 hrs, 1 hr, 2 hrs, 4 hrs, 8 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs, 48 hrs, 60 hrs, 72 hrs, 84 hrs, 96 hrs, 108 hrs, 120 hrs, 132 hrs and 144 hrs. Positive and higher scores indicate greater reduction in pain. SPIDt = ?PID x (time t - time t-1). Pain Intensity was assessed at baseline and at each time-point based on numerical rating scale (NRS) which is a horizontal line with a scale from 0-10, where 0 represents "No" and 10 represents the "worst possible pain". |
Baseline (Day 1) to Day 7 | No |
Secondary | Sum of Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief (SPRID) on Movement | SPRID:Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) and Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) at each post-dosing time-point. SPRID score ranged from -5.8 (least pain relief) to 40.3 (highest pain relief). SPID and TOTPAR were calculated as weighted sums of Pain Intensity Differences (PID) and Pain Relief Scores (PRS) at each measurement time; 0 hr (Day 1, pre treatment), 0.5 hr, 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr, 12 hr, 24 hr, 36 hr, 48 hr, 60 hr, 72 hr, 84 hr, 96 hr, 108 hr, 120 hr, 132 hr and 144 hr, respectively. PID was derived by subtracting the pain severity score at a given post-dosing time-point from the baseline [based on NRS which is a horizontal line with a scale from 0-10. where 0 represents "No" and 10 represents the "worst possible pain"]. NR scores were converted into PID scores by subtracting them from baseline pain scores. PRS was assessed on 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale [0-no relief, 1-little relief, 2-some relief, 3-a lot of relief, 4-complete relief] |
Baseline (Day 1) to Day 7 | No |
Secondary | Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) on Movement | TOTPAR was calculated as sum of products of pain relief (PR) at a given time-point (t) with the time-interval from that time-point to the previous time-point (t-1). The time-intervals used were 0 hrs (Day 1, baseline), 0.5 hrs, 1 hr, 2 hrs, 4 hrs, 8 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs, 48 hrs, 60 hrs, 72 hrs, 84 hrs, 96 hrs, 108 hrs, 120 hrs, 132 hrs and 144 hrs. Higher score indicated greater pain relief. TOTPARt = ?PR x (time t - time t-1). PR score was assessed at each of the above time-points based on a 5-point categorical scale [0-no relief, 1-little relief, 2-meaningful relief, 3-a lot of relief, 4-complete relief]. |
Baseline (Day 1) to Day 7 | No |
Secondary | Patients' Global Assessment to Treatment | Patients global assessment in response to treatment was measured at the end of the study on a scale of 0 to 4 where: 0- Poor; 1- Fair; 2- Good; 3- Very Good; 4- Excellent | Baseline (Day 1) to Day 14 | No |
Secondary | Rate of Rescue Medication Use | Rescue medication use was monitored throughout a period of 14 days. | Baseline (Day 1) to Day 14 | No |
Secondary | Time to First Dose of Rescue Medication Use | Rescue medication use was monitored throughout a period of 14 days. | Baseline (Day 1) to Day 14 | No |
Secondary | Total Dose of Rescue Medication Use | Rescue medication use was monitored throughout a period of 14 days. | Baseline (Day 1) to Day 14 | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02246361 -
Impact of Six Patient Information Leaflets (PIL) on Doctor Patient Communication
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01438905 -
Effect of Joint Mobilization in the Treatment of Chronic Ankle Instability
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04095598 -
Computed Tomography With Stress Maneuvers for Evaluation of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Instability (CTMETS)
|
||
Completed |
NCT01561365 -
Applicability of the Ottawa Ankle Rules
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01446341 -
Cast Immobilization Versus Functional Therapy for Acute, Severe Lateral Ankle Sprains
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01255423 -
Efficacy and Safety of Diclofenac Sodium Topical Gel 1% Applied 4 Times Daily in Subjects With Acute Ankle Sprain
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00797368 -
Manual Therapy and Exercise Versus Home Exercises in the Management of Patients Status Post Ankle Sprain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00573768 -
Efficacy and Safety of Diclofenac Diethylamine 2.32% Gel in Patients With Acute Ankle Sprain
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02324270 -
Safety and Efficacy of Generic Diclofenac Epolamine Acute Pain Due to Minor Ankle Sprain
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02433964 -
Evaluation of Therapeutic Effects of LED (627 +/- 10nm) The Initial Phase of the Ankle Sprains Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00446797 -
Open Label Comparative Study On Celecoxib Efficacy And Safety Vs Non-Selective NSAID In Acute Pain Due To Ankle Sprain
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02682303 -
Effect of Elastic Bandage on Balance in Chronic Ankle Instability
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02330198 -
Validation of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Tool in Finnish
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02097940 -
Influence of Sensorimotor Treatment in the Balance of Soccer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01423513 -
Effects of Ankle Support on Muscle Activation and Function
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01449760 -
Ankle Sprain Rehabilitation With the Wii Balance Board
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02945618 -
Neurocryostimulation for Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02491736 -
Ketoprofen Gel vs Placebo in Children With Ankle Sprain
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT02729207 -
Proof-of-concept Study of NSAID Hydrogel Patch in Treatment of Acute Pain
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00927641 -
HKT-500 in the Treatment of Adult Patients With Ankle Sprain
|
Phase 3 |