Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05916300
Other study ID # 81512267
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date September 18, 2023
Est. completion date December 2025

Study information

Verified date September 2023
Source Charles University, Czech Republic
Contact Petr Routner, MSc.
Phone +420602393203
Email routa2005@seznam.cz
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Ankle injuries are among the most common traumatological injuries of the lower limb accounting for approximately 50% of all sports injuries and 25% of musculoskeletal injuries in general. Correct initial diagnosis and proper management is important to reduce the risk of recurrent ankle instability and other complications, such as reduced range of motion, increased ligament laxity, instability, tendon enthesopathy, possible swelling, formation of calcifications, reduced load on the affected limbs while standing and walking, increased pain intensity and pain duration. To date, few studies showed that the effectiveness of physical therapy increases when it is modified based on diagnostic ultrasonography findings. Sonography is not burdensome for the patient, has high reproducibility, and enables dynamic examination and comparison of the interrelationships of individual structures. The aim of this study is to investigate if targeted physiotherapy for post-traumatic ankle conditions designed based of diagnostic ultrasonography findings is more effective than standard physiotherapy. The study hypothesis is that in the experimental group there will be a smaller number of complications of post-traumatic ankle conditions than in the control group. If confirmed the study could have clinical implications.


Description:

A randomized controlled trial In a randomized controlled trial, patients with post-traumatic soft tissue damage in the ankle area will be randomly divided into two groups. Both groups will undergo the same number of physiotherapy sessions (10 half-hour outpatient sessions over the course of two months) and will be examined with standard clinical tests and diagnostic ultrasonography at the beginning of the program and at week 8 using a standardized protocol published by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology. Both groups will undergo the same physiotherapy techniques. Their choice will be modified in the experimental group based on the current findings of diagnostic sonography, while in the control group they will be applied according to the standard procedure recommended by the physician. Randomization Participants meeting the entry criteria will be examined by diagnostic ultrasonography, then randomly assigned to two groups using software (https://www.randomizer.org/) and sent for an entry examination by an independent investigator. Group 1 will undergo standard physiotherapy without continuous monitoring of the course and effect of treatment with diagnostic ultrasonography. The treatment of the second group will be modified based on the current findings of the diagnostic ultrasonography. The therapeutic protocol for each patient will be given to an independent physiotherapist (the therapist will not know the details of the study) in a sealed envelope. Study participants Study participants will be recruited based on referrals from specialists (mainly orthopaedists or surgeons) following the entry and exclusion criteria below. When a patient meeting the criteria is detected, the specialist will offer the patient the opportunity to participate in the study, and if agreed, the patient will be sent to our workplace for an initial examination. Sample size A sample size of 26 patients per group (N=52) was estimated to test the difference in pain (primary outcome, scale 0-10; at 80% test power (Cohen´s d=0.8) and at the 0.05 significance level) between the intervention and control groups. We estimate that 15% of participants will not complete the study, therefore 68 patients will be enrolled in the study (34 patients in each group). Basic statistical analysis of outcome variables Difference in numeric variables (pain, chronic ankle instability rate, the 10 Metre Walk Test, examination of ankle dorsiflexion muscle strength) between the intervention and control groups will be tested using the two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney Test, if normality of the data was not fulfilled. Data normality will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test and visually using box and whisker plots, histograms and normal probability plots. Difference in categorical variables (the range of motion of the ankle, the presence of swelling, number of complications) will be tested using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, if at least one expected frequency will be smaller than 5. R software will be used for analysis. Examination Demographic, anthropometric and anamnestic data of all participants will be recorded at the beginning of the programme (age, sex, height, weight, exercise history, injury history, including frequency of past injuries, footwear). The clinical examination will be carried out at the beginning and at the end of the therapeutic program, i.e. after two months from the start of the program.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 70
Est. completion date December 2025
Est. primary completion date December 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 15 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Age = 15 years and = 65 years - Post-traumatic conditions in the ankle area, 0 - 6 weeks after the primary injury - Ability to undergo continuous outpatient physiotherapy treatment - Active cooperation of the patient Exclusion Criteria: - Age < 15 years and > 65 years - Serious diseases affecting effective physiotherapy (e.g. tissue damage of metabolic, degenerative, neurological or oncological origin) - Previous ankle surgery - Gypsum fixation

Study Design


Intervention

Other:
Diagnostic ultrasonography-guided physiotherapy group
All participants will complete free 10 outpatient 30-minute sessions. The therapy will be focused on increasing the range of motion and muscle strength, optimizing the function of the lower limbs, reducing possible complications of post-traumatic conditions in the ankle area. The physiotherapy procedures of the intervention group will be modified based on the initial diagnostic ultrasonography examination.

Locations

Country Name City State
Czechia Alafia-RHB Prague

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Petr Routner

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Czechia, 

References & Publications (21)

Bandinelli S, Benvenuti E, Del Lungo I, Baccini M, Benvenuti F, Di Iorio A, Ferrucci L. Measuring muscular strength of the lower limbs by hand-held dynamometer: a standard protocol. Aging (Milano). 1999 Oct;11(5):287-93. doi: 10.1007/BF03339802. — View Citation

BEGGS, Ian, STEFANO BIANCHI, ANGEL BUENO, MICHEL COHEN, MICHEL COURT-PAYEN, ANDREW GRAINGER, FRANZ KAINBERGER, ANDREA KLAUSER, CARLO MARTINOLI, EUGENE MCNALLY, J PHILIPO, PHILIPPE PEETRONS, MONIQUE REIJNIERSE. European Society of MusculoSkeletal Radiology Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Technical Guidelines VI. Ankle [online]. 2016 [cit. 2023-03-08]. Available at: https://essr.org/content-essr/uploads/2016/10/ankle.pdf

Bohannon RW. Reference values for extremity muscle strength obtained by hand-held dynamometry from adults aged 20 to 79 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Jan;78(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90005-8. — View Citation

De Maeseneer M, Marcelis S, Jager T, Shahabpour M, Van Roy P, Weaver J, Jacobson JA. Sonography of the normal ankle: a target approach using skeletal reference points. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Feb;192(2):487-95. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1316. — View Citation

Esterson PS. Measurement of ankle joint swelling using a figure of 8*. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1979;1(1):51-2. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1979.1.1.51. — View Citation

Faltus J, Boggess B, Bruzga R. The use of diagnostic musculoskeletal ultrasound to document soft tissue treatment mobilization of a quadriceps femoris muscle tear: a case report. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;7(3):342-9. No abstract available. — View Citation

Fernandez WG, Yard EE, Comstock RD. Epidemiology of lower extremity injuries among U.S. high school athletes. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Jul;14(7):641-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.03.1354. Epub 2007 May 18. — View Citation

HEROLD, I. Hodnocení bolesti a kvality analgezie u kriticky nemocných na JIP. Anesteziologie a Intenzivni Medicina. 2013; 24(6): 430-433. ISSN 12142158.

Hiller CE, Refshauge KM, Bundy AC, Herbert RD, Kilbreath SL. The Cumberland ankle instability tool: a report of validity and reliability testing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Sep;87(9):1235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.022. — View Citation

Innes S, Jackson J. Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging - An exploration of physiotherapists' interests and use in practice. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Dec;44:102068. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.102068. Epub 2019 Sep 30. — View Citation

Martin B. Ankle sprain complications: MRI evaluation. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2008 Apr;25(2):203-47, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2007.12.004. — View Citation

MCNALLY, E. Practical musculoskeletal ultrasound E-Book [online]. 2nd Edition. Churchill Livingstone, 2014. ISBN 978-1-4557-7404-3.

Melanson SW, Shuman VL. Acute Ankle Sprain. 2023 May 23. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459212/ — View Citation

PAZ, JC, QUINLAN, D. Acute Pain Management. Acute Care Handbook for Physical Therapists-E-Book. 2013; 7: 457-465.

Petersen EJ, Irish SM, Lyons CL, Miklaski SF, Bryan JM, Henderson NE, Masullo LN. Reliability of water volumetry and the figure of eight method on subjects with ankle joint swelling. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999 Oct;29(10):609-15. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1999.29.10.609. — View Citation

R CORE TEAM. R Core Team 2021 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/. R Foundation for Statistical Computing [online]. 2022, 2, 2019 [cit. 2023-01-30]. Available at: https://www.scirp.org/(S(czeh2tfqw2orz553k1w0r45))/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=3131254

SCHMITZ, Marc J.H. Musculoskeletal ultrasound of the extremity joints : technical scanning guidelines [online]. SonoSkills, 2022. ISBN 9083240304.

Sconfienza LM, Adriaensen M, Albano D, Alcala-Galiano A, Allen G, Aparisi Gomez MP, Aringhieri G, Bazzocchi A, Beggs I, Chianca V, Corazza A, Dalili D, De Dea M, Del Cura JL, Di Pietto F, Drakonaki E, Facal de Castro F, Filippiadis D, Gitto S, Grainger AJ, Greenwood S, Gupta H, Isaac A, Ivanoski S, Khanna M, Klauser A, Mansour R, Martin S, Mascarenhas V, Mauri G, McCarthy C, McKean D, McNally E, Melaki K, Messina C, Miron Mombiela R, Moutinho R, Olchowy C, Orlandi D, Prada Gonzalez R, Prakash M, Posadzy M, Rutkauskas S, Snoj Z, Tagliafico AS, Talaska A, Tomas X, Vasilevska Nikodinovska V, Vucetic J, Wilson D, Zaottini F, Zappia M, Obradov M. Clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)-part VI, foot and ankle. Eur Radiol. 2022 Feb;32(2):1384-1394. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08125-z. Epub 2021 Aug 25. — View Citation

Sisto SA, Dyson-Hudson T. Dynamometry testing in spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(1):123-36. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2005.11.0172. — View Citation

WATSON CP, BOLAND RA., REFSHAUGE KM. Measurement reliability of swelling in the acute ankle sprain. The Foot & Ankle Journal. 2008; 1(12): 4.

Yin Y, Yu Z, Wang J, Sun J. Effectiveness of the Rehabilitation Training Combined with Maitland Mobilization for the Treatment of Chronic Ankle Instability: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 20;19(22):15328. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215328. — View Citation

* Note: There are 21 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pain level Examination using the Wong-Baker scale. The scale is used to subjectively assess pain. Pain rating scale (0-10): 0 - no pain; 2 - hurts a little; 4 - hurts a little more; 6 - hurts even more; 8 - hurts a lot; 10 - hurts the most (0 is the best value, 10 is the worst). The change from baseline to 8 weeks
Primary The range of motion of the ankle Goniometry will be performed with a stainless steel two-arm goniometer (ref. SH5103).
Measurement of the ankle (talocrural joint) dorsiflexion range of motion: Participants will actively adduct the tip of the injured ankle while sitting on a physical therapy table. The expected range of motion with knee extension is approx. 10 degrees, with 20 degrees of knee flexion. For the evaluation, we will use a 3-point evaluation scale: 0-3 (0 - no limitation in dorsiflexion, 1 - small limitation in dorsiflexion, 2 - great limitation in dorsiflexion, 3 - no movement in dorsiflexion) (0 means the best value, 3 is the worst).
The change from baseline to 8 weeks
Primary The measurement of swelling Over the course of the therapy, we will measure the swelling with a standard retractable four-inch plastic tape measure and a marking pen according to a standardized protocol. (decreasing the size of edema over time marks positive change). The change from baseline to 8 weeks
Primary Number of complications The following complications will be monitored using sonographic examination based on a standardized protocol issued by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology using a 7L4BP 5-10 MHz linear probe.
The following complications will be measured according to standardized methodologies and evaluated by comparison with the same measured parameters on the ankle of the uninjured leg: 1. greater thickness of the ligaments (anterior tibiofibular and anterior talofibular ligament); 2. the presence of exudate in the area of anterior talofibular ligament, 3. the presence of calcifications, 4. a reduction in the continuity of the ligament apparatus in the ankle or the continuity of the syndesmosis compared to the non-affected leg. A higher number means a higher number of complications.
The change from baseline to 8 weeks
Secondary Chronic ankle instability rate The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) is a simple, valid and reliable instrument for discriminating and measuring the severity of functional ankle instability. The CAIT comprises a 9-item 30-point scale questionnaire (the higher final score indicates less severe functional ankle instability). Subjects with a score of 28 or higher are unlikely to have functional ankle instability, whereas subjects with a score of 27 or lower are likely to have functional ankle instability. The change from baseline to 8 weeks
Secondary Analysis of standing and walking The 10 Metre Walk Test. We will measure the gait speed, using a stopwatch and markers, a phone with a camera (the lower value means better result). The change from baseline to 8 weeks
Secondary Examination of ankle dorsiflexion muscle strength The examination will be held using a microFET2 hand-held digital dynamometer (Hoggan Scientific, USA).
The examination will be held according to a standardized protocol: Subjects will lie supine with the knee extended and ankle of the tested leg in a neutral position on the bed. Ankle dorsiflexion will be tested by placing a dynamometer over the dorsal surface of the midfoot, just proximal to the metatarsal phalangeal joints. We will measure the isometric muscle strength (in N) when the patient tries for maximum resistance against the dynamometer of the affected ankle for four seconds. A higher value of muscle strength after rehabilitation means an improvement of the condition.
The change from baseline to 8 weeks
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05555459 - Performance and Safety Evaluation of Inion CompressOn Screw in Foot and Ankle Surgeries. PMCF Investigation N/A
Completed NCT04235907 - Telerehabilitation Following Ankle Fractures N/A
Completed NCT02949674 - Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine as Preemptive Analgesia in Surgical Site in Ankle Fracture Patients Phase 3
Completed NCT02198768 - Ankle Fracture vs Ankle Fracture-Dislocation
Recruiting NCT04674046 - Deep Deltoid Ligament Integrity in Weber B Ankle Fractures - Mini-invasive Arthroscopic Evaluation. N/A
Recruiting NCT03696199 - Randomized Controlled Trial for Ankle Fracture Pain Control Phase 4
Recruiting NCT03259204 - Swedish Multicenter Trial of Outpatient Prevention of Leg Clots N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03625154 - Operative Versus Non Operative Management Outcomes of Isolated Lateral Malleolar Weber B Ankle Fractures N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03769909 - Prevention of Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis After Acute Intraarticular Fractures
Recruiting NCT05280639 - Simplified Post Op Rehabilitation for Ankle and Pilon Fractures N/A
Completed NCT02967172 - Efficacy of Multimodal Periarticular Injections in Operatively Treated Ankle Fractures Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT04768478 - CBD for Pain Reduction and Opioid Use After Ankle and Tibia Fracture ORIF Phase 4
Completed NCT05084794 - The Results of Middle-sized Posterior Malleolus Fractures: Fixed Versus Non-fixed N/A
Completed NCT03741556 - Prognostic Factors Following Ankle Fractures
Active, not recruiting NCT02481076 - Compression in Anklefracture Treatment, The CAT-study N/A
Recruiting NCT05729542 - Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Suture Button Versus Fibulink Fixation for Acute Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06086223 - Functional Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy N/A
Recruiting NCT05389436 - Outpatient Versus Inpatient Surgery for Ankle Fractures N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06329752 - Sciatic Nerve Block for Ankle and Leg Fracture Manipulation in the Emergency Department N/A
Recruiting NCT05391464 - Nerve Block for Pain Control After Fracture Surgery N/A