Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05412693
Other study ID # 22/00257-3
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 15, 2022
Est. completion date December 31, 2025

Study information

Verified date January 2023
Source Ostfold Hospital Trust
Contact Martin Gregersen
Phone 48171718
Email martinggregersen@gmail.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Stability dictates treatment choice for trans-syndesmotic fibula fractures. Optimal treatment for partially unstable fractures remains a topic of debate. The purpose of this study is to evaluate possible outcome non-inferior of functional orthosis treatment versus cast immobilization for these fractures.


Description:

Evidence suggests that Weber B ankle fractures should be treated nonoperatively if the ankle mortise is stable. Stability is maintained if the deltoid ligament is intact, also known as a Weber B/SER2 injury. Functional orthosis treatment is advised for these injuries. Recently, authors have demonstrated that the fractured ankle can be functionally stable even with a partial deltoid ligament injury. Our interpretation of a partial deltoid ligament injury is when weightbearing radiographs indicate stability (no increase in medial clear space), while concomitant gravity stress radiographs indicate instability (due to increase in medial clear space). It is suggested that this is referred to as a Weber B/SER4a injury. Although now considered for nonoperative treatment, partially unstable/SER4a injuries were traditionally treated operatively. Today, the superiority of one method of nonoperative treatment over another for partially unstable/SER4a injuries remains unclear. Some authors advocate cast immobilization while others have shown good outcomes after inconsistently using different orthoses and cast devices. The argument for cast immobilization appears to be a fear of posttraumatic osteoarthritis because of potential recurrent instability. As a result, cast immobilization of partially unstable/SER4a fractures is implemented in reference European guidelines, and thus must be considered the reference treatment. To our knowledge, no study has documented increased prevalence of osteoarthritis associated with functional treatment of partially unstable/SER4a fractures. The use of cast immobilization remains a precautionary principle, but the choice is not so clear cut because cast immobilization comes with an increased risk of joint stiffness and thromboembolic complications. Long-term radiographic and patient-reported outcome data evaluating possible non-inferiority of functional orthosis treatment compared to cast immobilization will assist in guiding future treatment strategies of these common fractures.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 110
Est. completion date December 31, 2025
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients: - With isolated Weber type B fractures that are deemed stable on weightbearing radiographs (MCS injured ankle - MCS uninjured ankle < 1 mm). - With concomitant gravity stress test evaluated as unstable (MCS injured ankle - MCS uninjured ankle < 1 mm) - Presenting to one of the participating hospitals, and that are available for stability evaluation within 14 days after injury. - 18-80 years of age - With pre-injury walking ability without aids. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients: - with fracture of the medial malleolus, pre-hospital closed fracture reduction, open fracture, fracture resulting from high-energy trauma or multi-trauma or pathologic fracture. - with fracture of the posterior malleolus involving 25% or more of the joint surface or with a step of the intraarticular surface. (non-displaced fractures smaller than 25% can be included) - with neuropathies and generalized joint disease such as Rheumatoid Arthritis. - that are assumed not compliant (drug use, cognitive- and/or psychiatric disorders). - with previous history of ipsilateral ankle fracture. - with previous history of ipsilateral major ankle-/foot surgery. - who live outside one of the participating hospitals catchment areas (not available for follow-up).

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Functional orthosis
See arm descriptions
Cast immobilization
See arm descriptions

Locations

Country Name City State
Norway Ålesund Hospital Ålesund
Norway Sykehuset Innlandet, Gjøvik Gjøvik
Norway Østfold Hospital Trust Sarpsborg Østfold

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Ostfold Hospital Trust Alesund Hospital, Sykehuset Innlandet HF

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Norway, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change from 6 weeks Manchester-Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire score at 2 years Scale 0-100, lower scores indicate less pain and symptoms. 6 weeks, 2 years
Secondary Change from 6 weeks Olerud Molander Ankle Score at 2 years Scale 0-100, higher scores indicate less pain and symptoms. 6 weeks, 2 years
Secondary Numeric rating scale of of patient satisfaction with treatment protocol A 0-10 rating scale for perceived satisfaction with orthosis or cast 6 weeks
Secondary Change from baseline tibiotalar congruity at 2 years Measurement of ankle medial clear space from weightbearing and gravity stress ankle radiographs Baseline, 2 years
Secondary Registrations of complications/adverse events Registration of possible loss of congruence, delayed union, non-union, thromboembolic events 2 years
Secondary Change from 6 weeks ankle range of motion at 2 years Measurement using a goniometer (ad modum Lindsjø) 6 weeks, 2 years
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05555459 - Performance and Safety Evaluation of Inion CompressOn Screw in Foot and Ankle Surgeries. PMCF Investigation N/A
Completed NCT04235907 - Telerehabilitation Following Ankle Fractures N/A
Completed NCT02949674 - Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine as Preemptive Analgesia in Surgical Site in Ankle Fracture Patients Phase 3
Completed NCT02198768 - Ankle Fracture vs Ankle Fracture-Dislocation
Recruiting NCT05916300 - Diagnostic Ultrasonography in Physiotherapy
Recruiting NCT04674046 - Deep Deltoid Ligament Integrity in Weber B Ankle Fractures - Mini-invasive Arthroscopic Evaluation. N/A
Recruiting NCT03696199 - Randomized Controlled Trial for Ankle Fracture Pain Control Phase 4
Recruiting NCT03259204 - Swedish Multicenter Trial of Outpatient Prevention of Leg Clots N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03625154 - Operative Versus Non Operative Management Outcomes of Isolated Lateral Malleolar Weber B Ankle Fractures N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03769909 - Prevention of Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis After Acute Intraarticular Fractures
Recruiting NCT05280639 - Simplified Post Op Rehabilitation for Ankle and Pilon Fractures N/A
Completed NCT02967172 - Efficacy of Multimodal Periarticular Injections in Operatively Treated Ankle Fractures Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT04768478 - CBD for Pain Reduction and Opioid Use After Ankle and Tibia Fracture ORIF Phase 4
Completed NCT05084794 - The Results of Middle-sized Posterior Malleolus Fractures: Fixed Versus Non-fixed N/A
Completed NCT03741556 - Prognostic Factors Following Ankle Fractures
Active, not recruiting NCT02481076 - Compression in Anklefracture Treatment, The CAT-study N/A
Recruiting NCT05729542 - Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Suture Button Versus Fibulink Fixation for Acute Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06086223 - Functional Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy N/A
Recruiting NCT05389436 - Outpatient Versus Inpatient Surgery for Ankle Fractures N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06329752 - Sciatic Nerve Block for Ankle and Leg Fracture Manipulation in the Emergency Department N/A