View clinical trials related to Ankle Fractures.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to verify the effect of anteroposterior talus mobilization on range of motion, pain, and functional capacity in participants with sub-acute and chronic ankle injuries.
Tibia-fibular syndesmosis injury occurs in a significant proportion of ankle injuries and is assumed to disrupt the syndesmotic ligaments. The goal of operative treatment is to reduce the ankle mortise to restore normal joint kinematics. Syndesmosis repair can be performed using either open or closed reduction, combined with fixation between the distal tibia and fibula. Closed fixation has demonstrated high rates of non anatomic reductions greater than 40%; therefore, open reduction will be performed in this study. Screw fixation is stable but concerns exist regarding potential excess rigidity. Recently, flexible fixation techniques combined with anatomic reduction have demonstrated improvements in functional outcomes and reduction quality. Both open reduction and flexible TightRope fixation have considerable support in the literature in cohort studies but have not been compared to open screw fixation in a randomized controlled trial. In this multi centre randomized study, radiographic, economic and functional outcomes are compared between [open reduction, flexible Tightrope syndesmosis fixation (OT)] and [open reduction screw fixation (OS)] of the syndesmosis.
The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of patients with an ankle fracture to those with ankle fracture-dislocations. We hypothesize that long-term clinical outcomes for patients sustaining ankle fracture dislocations are poorer than those without dislocation.
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of variations in practice, ranging from early functional rehabilitation to complete immobilsation in post operative patients with ankle fixation following fractures. The primary goal of any post-operative regimen is to attain full weight-bearing and as close to pre-injury levels of activity as soon as possible. We seek to establish the effect on (1) functional outcome, (2) complication rates and (3) time to return to work of three different approaches to rehabilitation after ankle fracture fixation in order to produce a standardised, evidence-based guideline for our unit. We also aim to perform a cost analysis for each approach.
The purpose of this exploratory study is to characterize the postoperative pain profile of patients undergoing operation with internal fixation of an ankle fracture under nerve block anaesthesia. Special attention is payed towards the possible existence and clinical relevance of a rebound pain phenomenon upon cessation of the nerve block. Results are used to guide the set up of a randomized controlled trial on the subject.
This study involves a drug called Exparel that has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for application directly to wound sites. EXPAREL® is a long acting pain reliever. It is being given in this study to see if it provides safe and effective pain relief after ankle surgery. Because it is a long acting drug, it may lessen pain relief for as much as 72 hours after surgery. EXPAREL® has not been approved by the FDA for administration by popliteal block, which is the method the study doctors will use to give the patients the drug. Giving the drug by popliteal block involves inserting a small tube in to the back of the knee to deliver the drug. The study doctors wish to determine if patients undergoing ankle surgery and receiving this drug have less pain and less need for narcotic medication.
Isolated surgical repair of the inside portion of the tibia may be enough to stabilize an ankle fracture in which both the tibia and the fibula are broken. This would alleviate the need for another incision, plate, and screws to repair the fibula. The purpose of this study is to help determine if surgically repairing only the tibia fracture will lead to equivalent clinical outcomes when compared with surgical repair of both bones. The hypothesis of this study is that operative stabilization of the medial malleolus fracture only, in otherwise ligamentously stable bimalleolar and/or trimalleolar fractures of the ankle, will lead to equivalent clinical outcomes and functional scores as those treated with operative stabilization of both malleoli and/or all malleoli.
Unstable ankle fractures are commonly treated operatively. After operative reduction and fixation of the fractures, there are varying rehabilitation regimes that include non-weightbearing for 6 weeks with active range of motion exercise in a removal cast or brace, or early protected weightbearing in a rigid cast. Several papers reported that early weightbearing may decrease ankle stiffness, muscle and bone atrophy, and aids in early return to activities. However, early weightbearing may have the risk of displacement of the fixed fractures. Rehabilitation after operative treatment of an ankle fracture is still not clear. We hypothesized that the ankle function assessed on 12 months after operation of an ankle fracture with early weightbearing is not inferior to non-weightbearing but is superior to non-weightbearing with respect to time to return to normal daily life and time to full weightbearing.
This clinical, randomized, and controlled study will provide valuable scientific evidence regarding the effect of adding peripheral nerve blockades to general anaesthesia during ankle surgery. In particular, the investigators want to determine if the need for postoperative opioids will be reduced and whether this will lead to shorter admission to recovery room and fewer instances of side effects such as postoperative nausea and vomiting. In addition, the investigators will determine whether the functional outcome is improved i.e. faster and more successful rehabilitation. This would have profound benefits not only to the individual patient but also to society by reducing expenses during admission, the cost of sick leave etc.
Background and aims: Ultrasound-guided (USG) nerve blocks of the sciatic nerve (popliteal level = PL) and the saphenous nerve (mid-femoral level = MFL) provides analgesia following leg surgery. Traditionally two separate injections are performed. The aim was to describe a novel, faster USG block combination requiring only one skin penetration to block the sciatic and saphenous nerves; i.e. the SPEDI block = Single PEnetration Dual Injection. Methods: A randomized, controlled and double-blinded trial. Following ethics committee approval 60 patients will be randomized to the administration of an USG SPEDI block compared to two separate USG blocks of the saphenous (MFL) and sciatic (PL) nerves. Blocks will be performed after induction of general anaesthesia. Outcome measures will be performance time (primary outcome measure), Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit pain scores (VAS scores 0-10), block difficulty level (easy, middle, difficult), opioid consumption (in the PACU), serum-ropivacaine pharmacokinetics (blood sample 0-180 minutes). Both block combinations will be evaluated by MR imaging (MRI). Hypothesis: The USG SPEDI block combination is expected to be performed significantly faster without moving the leg, and achieve successful perioperative pain management. The SPEDI block may find important use in the emergency setting.