View clinical trials related to Ankle Fractures.
Filter by:The purpose of this randomized, controlled trial is to estimate the safety of early weight bearing on post ankle surgery. Patients who are indicated to have surgery for unstable ankle fractures by an attending trauma physician will be consented for participation in the study. After surgery patients will be randomized to either weight bearing as tolerated at two weeks with a cam boot or non-weight bearing with a cam boot. Randomization will be performed by number allocation with odd numbers in the early weight bearing group and even numbers in the non-weight bearing group. The surgeon will be blinded to this until after the surgery. The patients will all be placed in a short leg cast post operative and made non-weight bearing for 2 weeks until sutures are removed which is current standard treatment. Both groups will be asked to initiate weight bearing at two weeks post operatively by wearing a cam boot that is non weight bearing in a cam boot, the latter being standard treatment.
The purpose of this observational study is to assess the rate of return to work, rate of return to activities, functional outcome measures and pain scores in operatively repaired rotational Bimalleolar and Trimalleolar (AO/OTA Classification of 44A and 44B) ankle fractures not requiring fixation of the syndesmosis and allowed early weight bearing on or before the first post-operative visit.
The OL1000 is intended to be used as a non-invasive adjunctive treatment for adult males or females that have sustained a closed, unstable ankle fracture that requires surgical treatment for stabilization. The initiation of the adjunctive treatment is to begin within 11 days of surgical stabilization.
This study is an observational study to test and validate a questionnaire and statistical model used to determine patient preferences regarding treatment for any one of 11 musculoskeletal conditions: hip arthritis, knee arthritis, hip labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), osteochondritis dissecans, Achilles tendon rupture, patellofemoral dislocation, distal radius fracture, and fractures of the hip, ankle, tibia, and proximal humerus. This study aims to understand how multiple treatment variables, including pain, rehabilitation time, cost, and choice of surgical versus non-surgical intervention, impact patients' decision-making processes and ultimate choice of treatment.
The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to assess if manual therapy improves mobility, gait, and balance more than a control group for patients who have undergone open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) after an ankle/hindfoot fracture.
The purpose of this study is to investigate patient related factors that contribute to increased risk of recurrent fractures and to investigate patient adherence to prescribed anti-osteoporotic drugs.
To compare measures of ankle stability from an investigational cone beam computed tomography scanner to gravity stress X-ray in patients who have unstable supination-external rotation ankle fractures.
In AO Weber type C fractures, there is a combination of a proximal fibular fracture, a medial fracture or ruptured deltoid ligament, and a syndesmotic injury. Anatomical repair and reduction of the syndesmosis is essential to prevent diastasis in the ankle-joint. Widening and chronical instability of the syndesmosis is related to worse functional outcome and development of posttraumatic osteoarthritis in the ankle. There is limited biomechanical and clinical evidence that syndesmotic stability in AO Weber type C fractures with an additional posterior malleolar fracture can also be reached by fixation of the posterior malleolar fragment. Maybe, this is even superior to the usual treatment with syndesmotic positioning screws. Some authors concluded that stability of the syndesmosis in these fractures can be much more achieved by fixation of the posterior malleolar fragment than by placement of syndesmotic positioning screws alone. Another additional benefit of open reduction and fixation of the posterior malleolar fragment is that this will lead to an anatomical reconstruction of the syndesmosis. Although there is no current evidence, it is likely that a malreduction of the fibula in the tibial incisura will lead to a worse functional outcome on the long-term. No clear consensus in the literature is found as to which fragment size of the posterior malleolus should be internally fixed. The general opinion is that displaced fragments that involve more than 25% of the distal articular tibia should be fixed. Traditionally, reduction of these larger fragments is indirectly, followed by percutaneous screw fixation in anterior-posterior direction. Disadvantages are that it is hard to achieve an anatomical reduction, and that percutaneous fixation of smaller fragments is very difficult. Recently, a direct exposure of the posterior tibia via a posterolateral approach in prone position, followed by open reduction and fixation with screws in posterior-anterior direction or antiglide plate is advocated by several authors. This approach allows perfect visualization of the fracture, articular anatomical reduction, and strong fixation. Another advantage is that even small posterior fragments can be addressed. Several case series are published, which describe minimal major wound complications, good functional outcomes, and minimal need for reoperation.
The optimal treatment of ankle fractures with involvement of the posterior malleolus remains a subject of debate. Despite a large amount of literature on the role of the posterior malleolus in a so-called trimalleolar fracture, there are no clear guidelines for its treatment. Its size is the leading indication whether fixation of the fragment is necessary or not. Most orthopedic surgeons consider a posterior malleolar fracture fragment larger than 25% to 33% an indication for fixation. Interestingly, after careful evaluation of the available literature, there does not seem to be hard evidence for these numbers. It is generally accepted that restoration of a normal anatomic mortise and normal tibiotalar contact area are key elements for a good functional outcome. Inadequate reduction of the posterior fragment may alter the tibiotalar contact area and the joint biomechanics with altered stresses in parts of the joint, leading to the development of osteoarthritis and worse functional outcome. Traditionally, reduction of these larger fragments is indirectly, followed by percutaneous screw fixation in anterior-posterior direction. Disadvantages are that it is hard to achieve an anatomical reduction, and that fixation of smaller fragments is very difficult. Recently, a direct exposure of the posterior tibia via a posterolateral approach in prone position, followed by open reduction and fixation with screws in posterior-anterior direction or antiglide plate is advocated by several authors. This approach allows perfect visualization of the fracture, articular anatomical reduction, and strong fixation. Another advantage is that even small posterior fragments can be addressed. Several case series are published, which describe minimal major wound complications, good functional outcomes, and minimal need for reoperation. Since 2 years, in our institution we perform an open, anatomical reduction and fixation of all medium-sized posterior fragments via this approach. Although not thoroughly investigated yet, it seems to lead to better clinical outcomes than described in the literature and our retrospective cohort study.
The primary objective of this study will be to evaluate the functional outcome of patients who present with a distal fibula fracture who were treated with either intermedullary nail (IMN) fixation or plate fixation.