Animal Phobia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Improving the Exposure Therapy Through Projection-based Augmented Reality for the Treatment of Cockroach Phobia: A Multiple-baseline Single Case Study
Verified date | May 2024 |
Source | Universitat Jaume I |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The aim of this study is to test the efficacy and efficiency of varying the phobic stimuli during the augmented reality (AR) exposure therapy using multiple stimuli versus one single stimulus through projection-based AR (P-ARET) for the treatment of participants diagnosed with cockroach phobia.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 4 |
Est. completion date | December 30, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Being at least 18 years old - Meeting DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for SP (animal subtype) to cockroaches - Having a minimum of six-month duration of the phobia - Sign an informed consent - Presenting a score of at least 4 on the fear and avoidance scales of the diagnostic interview applied Exclusion Criteria: - Presence of another severe mental disorder that requires immediate attention - Having current alcohol or drug dependence or abuse, psychosis or severe organic illness - Currently being treated in a similar treatment program - Being capable of inserting their hands in a plastic container with a cockroach (during the behavioral test) - Receiving other psychological treatment during the study for cockroach phobia - Start receiving pharmacological treatment during the study (or in case of being already taking them, change the drug or dose) |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Spain | Universitat Jaume I | Castellón De La Plana | Castellón |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Universitat Jaume I |
Spain,
Botella C, Mira A, Moragrega I, Garcia-Palacios A, Breton-Lopez J, Castilla D, Riera Lopez Del Amo A, Soler C, Molinari G, Quero S, Guillen-Botella V, Miralles I, Nebot S, Serrano B, Majoe D, Alcaniz M, Banos RM. An Internet-based program for depression using activity and physiological sensors: efficacy, expectations, satisfaction, and ease of use. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Feb 23;12:393-406. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S93315. eCollection 2016. — View Citation
Shiban Y, Schelhorn I, Pauli P, Muhlberger A. Effect of combined multiple contexts and multiple stimuli exposure in spider phobia: A randomized clinical trial in virtual reality. Behav Res Ther. 2015 Aug;71:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 May 28. — View Citation
Wrzesien, M., Botella, C., Bretón-López, J., del Río González, E., Burkhardt, J. M., Alcañiz, M., & Pérez-Ara, M. Á. (2015). Treating small animal phobias using a projective-augmented reality system: A single-case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 343-353.
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Change in Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV-TR (ADIS-IV) - Specific Phobia | Diagnostic interview for specific phobia based on DSM-IV-TR criteria. | At the beginning of the intervention and immediately after the treatment, and at 1, 6 and 12 months after the end of the treatment. | |
Other | Change in The Clinician Severity Scale (adapted from Di Nardo, Brown & Barlow, 1994). | This instrument assesses the severity of symptoms evaluated by the clinician and the scale ranged from 0 (absent) to 8 (very severe). | At the beginning of the intervention and immediately after the treatment | |
Other | Change in Scale of expectation and satisfaction with the treatment (adapted from Borkovec y Nau, 1972) | This instrument contains 6 items ranged from 0 (nothing) to 10 (very much) assessing the patient's opinions about the treatment, focusing on their expectations and degree of satisfaction. | At the beginning of the intervention and immediately after the treatment | |
Primary | Change in Behavioral Avoidance Test (BAT; adapted from Öst, Salkovskis, & Hellström's, 1991) | Patients will be confronted to a real cockroach and they will be encouraged to get closer and interact with the stimulus as much as they can. The anxiety level (0-10), distance and level of interaction with the animal will be registered evaluated in a scale ranging from 0 (the participant does not enter the room) to 12 (interacts with the cockroach). | At the beginning of the intervention and immediately after the treatment | |
Primary | Change in fear, avoidance, belief in negative thoughts and coping ability with the feared stimulus levels. | Item1: If you see a cockroach in front of you at this moment… To what extent would you be scared of it? Item 2: If you see a cockroach in front of you at this moment… to what extent would you avoid it?, Item 3: If you see a cockroach in front of you at this moment… To what extent would you believe that it is dangerous for you?, Item 4: To what extent you believe that you could cope with a cockroach of different size, colour and shape? Ranged from 0 (nothing) to 10 (very much) | Once a day (from the start of the baseline until the end of the treatment) and at 1, 6 and 12 months after the end of the treatment. | |
Secondary | Change in Fear of Cockroaches Questionnaire (adapted from Fear of Spiders Questionnaire; FSQ, Szymanski & O'Donohue, 1995) | This questionnaire assesses the level of fear to cockroaches. It has 18 items evaluated in a scale ranging from 1 (nothing) to 7 (very much). | At the beginning of the intervention and immediately after the treatment | |
Secondary | Patient's Improvement Scale (adapted from the Clinical Global Impression scale; CGI, Guy, 1976). | This instrument evaluates the degree of improvement of the patient' symptoms after the treatment compared to the start. It is ranged from 1 (much worse) and 7 (much better). | At the beginning of the intervention and immediately after the treatment | |
Secondary | Change in Behavioral Avoidance Test through AR (BAT; adapted from Öst, Salkovskis, & Hellström's, 1991) | Patients will be confronted to a novel projected cockroach (not used before in any treatment condition) and they will be encouraged to get closer and interact with the stimulus as much as they can. The anxiety level (0-10), distance and level of interaction with the animal will be registered evaluated in a scale ranging from 0 (the participant does not enter the room) to 12 (interacts with the cockroach). | At the beginning of the intervention and immediately after the treatment | |
Secondary | Preferences | Preferences about the treatment condition (MS versus SS) were assessed with a questionnaire composed of the following items: Item 1 "If you could choose between the two types of exposure sessions, which one would you choose?; Item 2 "Which of these two ways of applying the exposure session do you consider to be more effective in helping you overcome your problem?"; Item 3 "Which of these two ways of applying the exposure session do you consider more aversive?"; and Item 4 "Which of these two ways to apply the exposure session would you recommend to a friend who had the same problem?" | Immediately after the treatment |