Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00121654
Other study ID # ITA-SCS1
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 4
First received July 14, 2005
Last updated March 9, 2009
Start date July 2005
Est. completion date December 2009

Study information

Verified date March 2009
Source Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Contact Gaetano A Lanza, MD
Phone +390630154187
Email g.a.lanza@rm.unicatt.it
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Italy: Ministry of Health
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study aims at assessing safety and efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris in a single blind, prospective, multicenter study.

Sixty patients with refractory angina with new SCS device implantation will be randomized to one of three treatment groups:

- paresthesic SCS;

- subliminal SCS;

- low (non effective) stimulation (control).

Clinical follow-up will be done at 1 and 3 months. Control group patients will then be randomized to paresthesic SCS or subliminal SCS for another 3 months and the 2 groups will be reassessed at 6 months.


Description:

Aim of the study is to assess safety and efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris in a single blind, prospective, multicenter study. The study also assesses whether subliminal SCS may be as effective as paresthesic SCS in these patients.

Sixty consecutive patients with refractory angina with a new SCS device implantation will be randomized to one of three treatment groups:

- paresthesic SCS (group 1);

- subliminal SCS (75-80% of paresthesic threshold; group 2);

- low stimulation, consisting of an hour of SCS a day at 0.05 mV intensity, which does not have any significant stimulator effect (sham stimulation, group 3).

Study Procedure

Medical history, clinical data, drug therapy, Angina Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification, Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), quality of life estimation by EuroQoL scale, detailed evaluation of angina attacks (frequency, intensity, duration of episodes; nitrates assumption) according to a structured diary, number of hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) admissions and cardiological visits in the previous 6 months and treadmill exercise stress test results will be obtained at the baseline visit.

Patients fulfilling inclusion criteria will undergo SCS implant. During the implant, stimulation tests will be performed to check paresthesic coverage of angina pain chest area.

Patients with adequate paresthesias will be randomized to one of the 3 groups. Follow-up visits will be performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the SCS implant. Drug therapy will not be changed at least during the first 3 months.

Patients assigned to group 2 (subliminal SCS) and those assigned to group 3 (sham SCS) will be blinded about the assigned treatment.

After the 3 months group 3, patients will be randomized to group 1 or group 2 and reassessed at 6-month follow-up (comparison between paresthesic versus subliminal SCS).

The controlled study will end at the 6-month follow-up, when each investigator will decide for the best stimulation for individual patients. Every patient will then be followed until 12 months from SCS implant.

Clinical assessment will be done at each follow-up visit. Exercise stress test results will be repeated at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up visits.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date December 2009
Est. primary completion date December 2008
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 90 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Stable angina pectoris refractory to optimal medical therapy, with at least 10 angina episodes in the three weeks previous SCS implant;

- Documentation of coronary artery disease and reversible myocardial ischaemia;

- Patient is not a candidate for or refuses surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization;

- Availability for follow-up visits;

- Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Severe spinal cord diseases that prevent the catheter positioning in the epidural space;

- No paresthesic coverage of angina pain area during SCS;

- Unstable angina pectoris;

- Female patients in fertile age;

- Enrolment in other studies;

- Need for anticoagulant therapy;

- Patients needing diathermy treatment;

- Life expectancy <12 months.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Spinal cord stimulation
Under sterile conditions and local anesthesia, the epidural space is punctured at the level of T5-T6 and a quadripolar electrode catheter is introduced and advanced under X-ray control into the epidural space. A suitable position for the electrode catheter is sought for, corresponding to the site where a prickling sensation (paresthesia) is felt and covers the area of radiation of angina pain under neurostimulation. The electrode catheter is connected to an internal pulse generator placed in a subcutaneous abdominal or gluteal pocket through an extension lead connected to the electrode by subcutaneous tunneling.

Locations

Country Name City State
Italy Istituto di Cardiologia - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Roma

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Reduction of angina symptoms 1, 3, 6 and 12 months No
Primary improvement of quality of life 1, 3, 6 and 12 months No
Secondary Improvement of exercise induced myocardial ischemia 3, 6 and 12 months No
Secondary evaluation of adverse events and complications 0, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months Yes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05563701 - Evaluation of the LVivo Image Quality Scoring (IQS)
Recruiting NCT02773615 - CT Perfusion Added to CT Angiography
Active, not recruiting NCT04475380 - Complex All-comers and Patients With Diabetes or Prediabetes, Treated With Xience Sierra Everolimus-eluting Stents
Terminated NCT02548611 - Comparison of Loading Strategies With Antiplatelet Drugs in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Intervention Phase 4
Completed NCT02264717 - Dan-NICAD - Danish Study of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Testing in Coronary Artery Disease N/A
Completed NCT02440893 - Understanding the Effect of Metformin on Corus CAD (or ASGES)
Completed NCT01486030 - Effect of Exercise Stress Testing on Peripheral Gene Expression Using Corus CAD (or ASGES) Diagnostic Test
Completed NCT01425359 - Type 2 Diabetes Evaluation of Ranolazine in Subjects With Chronic Stable Angina Phase 4
Completed NCT01604486 - Natural Ischaemic Preconditioning Before First Myocardial Infarction N/A
Completed NCT00811772 - Trial of Drug Eluting Stent Versus Bare Metal Stent to Treat Coronary Artery Stenosis N/A
Completed NCT00131183 - Testosterone Therapy on Angina Threshold and Atheroma in Patients With Chronic Stable Angina Phase 4
Completed NCT00184444 - Effect of Increased Oxygenation in the Air During Endurance Training in Stable Angina Pectoris Patients N/A
Completed NCT00235404 - Randomized Controlled Trial of Health Care to Elderly Patients. N/A
Terminated NCT00157742 - Comparison of SCS and PMR in Patients With Refractory Angina Pectoris Phase 4
Completed NCT00000510 - Platelet-Inhibitor Drug Trial in Coronary Angioplasty Phase 3
Completed NCT00005148 - Coronary Heart Disease Incidence, Mortality, and Risk Factor Relationships N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03657758 - Lesional Evaluation of High Risk Patients With Neoatherosclerosis Treated With Rosuvastatin and Eicosapentaenoic Acid Using Optical Coherence Tomography(OCT)[LINK IT TWO] Phase 4
Completed NCT05050773 - Registry Study of Medical Therapy in Patients With Angina Pectoris(GREAT)
Completed NCT00093223 - A Safety Study of ABI-007 for In-Stent Restenosis Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT02508714 - Bioresorbable Polymer ORSIRO Versus Durable Polymer RESOLUTE ONYX Stents N/A