View clinical trials related to Anemia, Sickle Cell.
Filter by:This is a single center, non-randomized, open label, single-dose study in subjects with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD). The study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of autologous CRISPR-Cas9 modified CD34+ human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (hHSPCs) (BRL-101).
This is a single center, non-randomized, open label, single-dose study in subjects with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD). The study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of autologous CRISPR-Cas9 modified CD34+ human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (hHSPCs) (BRL-101)
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of mitapivat on albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) response in participants with sickle cell disease (SCD) and nephropathy.
Suboptimal vitamin D status is well reported in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients and associated with a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL). The investigators enrolled 42 SCD patients and 42 healthy controls, subjects within each group received monthly oral vitamin D3 dose according to the baseline status of vitamin D as follows: sufficient: 100,000 IU, insufficient: 150,000 IU, and deficient: 200,000 IU. The investigators assessed safety and efficacy on normalization of vitamin D level, bone mineral density (BMD), hand grip strength (HGS), and HRQL.
This study is for caregivers of young children with sickle cell disease and adolescents with sickle cell disease who are currently prescribed hydroxyurea and are receiving care at one of the study sites. The study will assess retention and engagement during a pilot randomized control trial comparing video directly observed therapy (VDOT) to attention control. We also hope to understand more about patient and family preferences longer-term adherence monitoring and intervention. Participants will use an electronic adherence monitor (provided by the study team) to measure how often they are taking their hydroxyurea. Participants will also be asked to complete questionnaires throughout the study period to provide information about their expectations for, experience with, and satisfaction with the study materials.
The goal of this short term prospective Phase II study is to compare the effects of two alternate daily doses of zinc (25 and 40 mg/day) in 34 randomly assigned homozygous Sickle Cell Disease (SCD-SS) patients aged 15-35 years old. The main question it aims to answer is: Which biomarkers are most responsive to zinc supplementation, and what is the maximum tolerated zinc dose that induces the desired changes in biomarkers of bone turnover? Participants will be recruited from 7 American Society Hematology Research Collaborative SCD Centers. Eligible SCD subjects will be invited to participate in the 16-week study, involving 2 baseline blood draws 4 weeks apart, followed by a 12-week zinc intervention. The findings from this study will be used to determine the dosage of zinc to be used in a larger, future study on the long term impact of zinc supplementation on bone health in SCD-SS.
Background: Sickle cell disorder (SCD), the commonest genetic (faulty gene inherited from both parents) condition in the UK, affects mainly underserved groups. Babies with SCD must start treatments soon after birth to prevent them becoming unwell. Stigma, fear and inequalities can make it difficult for parents to accept their child's diagnosis and access appropriate treatment and support. Aim: Develop strategies to improve support for parents during their child's first year of life following a SCD diagnosis to encourage early engagement with health services. Method: Comprises two stages: (i) Determine why parents choose to engage with support or not (ii) Use this information to co-design strategies to ensure greater accessibility of support for parents during their child's first year of life. Patient and Public Involvement: We are working with Sickle Cell Society and parents of children with SCD. Dissemination: Findings will be shared with support groups, charities, health professionals and academics.
ENROL, the European Rare Blood Disorders Platform has been conceived in the core of ERN-EuroBloodNet as an umbrella for both new and already existing registries on Rare Hematological Diseases (RHDs). ENROL aims at avoiding fragmentation of data by promoting the standards for patient registries' interoperability released by the EU RD platform. ENROL's principle is to maximize public benefit from data on RHDs opened up through the platform with the only restriction needed to guarantee patient rights and confidentiality, in agreement with EU regulations for cross-border sharing of personal data. Accordingly, ENROL will map the EU-level demographics, survival rates, diagnosis methods, genetic information, main clinical manifestations, and treatments in order to obtain epidemiological figures and identify trial cohorts for basic and clinical research. To this aim, ENROL will connect and facilitate the upgrading of existing RHD registries, while promoting the building of new ones when / where lacking. Target-driven actions will be carried out in collaboration with EURORDIS for educating patients and families about the benefits of enrolment in such registries, including different cultural and linguistic strategies. The standardized collection and monitoring of disease-specific healthcare outcomes through the ENROL user-friendly platform will determine how specialized care is delivered, where are the gaps in diagnosis, care, or treatment and where best to allocate financial, technical, or human resources. Moreover, it will allow for promoting research, especially for those issues that remain unanswered or sub-optimally addressed by the scientific community; furthermore, it will allow promoting clinical trials for new drugs. ENROL will enable the generation of evidence for better healthcare for RHD patients in the EU as the ultimate goal. ENROL officially started on 1st June 2020 with a duration of 36 months. ENROL is co-funded by the Health Programme of the European Union under the call for proposals HP-PJ-2019 on Rare disease registries for the European Reference Networks. GA number 947670
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by recurrent vaso-occlusive pain crisis (VOC), which may evolve to acute chest syndrome (ACS), the most common cause of death among adult patients with SCD. Currently, there is no etiologic treatment to abort ACS. Therefore, management of ACS mostly involve a symptomatic approach including in routine, and as per recommendations, hydration, analgesics, supplemental oxygen, and transfusion. The polymerisation of sickle haemoglobin (HbS) is one major feature in the pathogenesis of vaso-occlusion. Current guidelines recommend red blood cell exchange transfusion (REX) in patients with severe ACS in order to improve oxygenation and reduce HbS concentration to blunt sickling. REX is often preferred over simple transfusion in this setting because it rapidly reduces HbS without raising final haematocrit. There are currently two methods for REX: manual (with sequential phlebotomies and transfusions) or automated (erythrocytapheresis). The former allows a sober use of red blood cell packs, while the latter achieves haematological targets (HbS and haematocrit) quickly and more consistently, but requires a special equipment and trained staff. As a result of inflammation and intravascular hemolysis, the plasma of patients with ACS may also contain several components that promote vaso-occlusion, lung injury and organ failure, including cytokines (e.g., IL-6), free haemoglobin and free haem. Conversely, it is depleted in haptoglobin and hemopexin, which normally bind to and clear cell-free haemoglobin. The addition of therapeutic plasma exchange to erythrocytapheresis during automated REX may therefore have a dual beneficial effect in patients with overt intravascular hemolysis: i) deplete the inflammatory mediators and products of hemolysis; ii) replete haptoglobin and hemopexin. REX modalities (automated vs manual) have not been tested during ACS. The hypothesis is that early-goal directed automated REX may accelerate the resolution of severe ACS as compared to manual REX.
Rare Anaemia Disorders (RADs) is a group of rare diseases characterized for presenting anaemia as the main clinical manifestation. Different medical entities classified as RADs by ORPHA classification are most of them chronic life threating disorders with many unmet needs for their proper clinical management creating an impact on European health systems. RADs present diagnostic challenges and their appropriate management requires from specialised multidisciplinary teams in Centers of expertise. Although there are some examples of well-established national registries on RADs in EU, the lack of recommendations for Rare disease registries implementation and the lack of standards for interoperability has led to the fragmentation or unavailability of data on prevalence, survival, main clinical manifestations or treatments in most of the European countries.