Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT02404012 |
Other study ID # |
IRB1410015305 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
November 2014 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
August 2022 |
Source |
Indiana University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
There is a high prevalence of iron deficiency in patients who undergo bariatric surgery and
effective therapies are lacking. Thus, there is a critical need for an effective,
non-invasive, and inexpensive form of iron supplementation to treat iron deficiency and
improve tolerance, the associated cognitive symptoms, and quality of life in the bariatric
surgery patient population. Often, patients do not participate in bariatric programs, are not
compliant, and/or are lost to follow-up. If there is a more effective and evidence-based
guideline for repletion of iron deficiency, patients are more likely to be compliant.
Therefore, in a randomized controlled study, the investigators propose to test the
effectiveness of various iron formulations versus ferrous sulfate, which is the standard of
care, for oral iron supplementation of iron deficient patients who have had RYGB or SG
bariatric surgery. By randomizing patients into the two groups, the investigators will be
able to determine the most effective regimen to improve blood biomarkers of iron status,
cognitive function, and quality of life. Other outcomes will include adverse effects and
compliance to the supplementation. The investigators will also analyze three-day food records
to determine the contribution of dietary factors to changes in iron status. To test for
improvement of iron status, serial blood draws will be performed during a time period of ~10
weeks. Serial blood draws from iron deficient patients have routinely been performed in past
studies and have not been found to be harmful. Because this is a relatively short study (10
weeks), subjects will be able to recover quickly from the blood loss during the study. The
investigators expect to find that iron supplementation with organic formulations of iron will
be as effective than ferrous sulfate for repletion of iron deficiency, and they will be
better tolerated. This project will address a significant health issue in individuals who
have had bariatric surgery, which is a growing population in the United States. It is
estimated that almost 1.5 million individuals have undergone bariatric surgery since the year
1990.
Description:
Objectives:
1. To determine the most effective oral iron supplementation regimen for repletion of iron
deficiency in patients who have had gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. In iron
deficient patients, two supplement regimens will be compared:
1. Ferrous sulfate 65 mg t.i.d. (standard of care / control), which is elemental iron
2. AspironTM, which is an organic formulation of iron
Primary outcomes will be reference indices of iron status:
- Ferritin, TIBC, sTfR, and sTfR:ferritin ratio
- Secondary outcomes will be:
- measures of anemia, determined by blood hemoglobin concentrations
- measures of cognitive function via several computerized tests on working memory,
sustained attention, and spatial memory
- fatigue by Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory questionnaire
- Quality of life by SF-36 Survey
Safety outcomes will be:
• adverse events, compliance, measures of iron toxicity, and liver enzymes
2. In the same subjects undergoing iron supplementation described in Aim 1, to determine
the contribution of dietary factors (including heme and non-heme iron intake, and intake
of enhancers and inhibitors of iron absorption) to changes in iron status.