View clinical trials related to Androgenetic Alopecia.
Filter by:The study is designed to validate safety results from the Phase 1 PP405-001 trial while also characterizing longer term safety and PK following 28 days of administration.
Androgenetic alopecia is a common condition affects both genders. Patients of androgenetic alopecia following inclusion criteria will be enrolled after ethical approval and informed consent. Pre-treatment assessment will be done by Physian Global assessment, Patient global assessment and hair density by trichoscopy of areas under treatment. Patients will be categorized in 2 groups. Group A receiving exosomes 1session intradermally in scalp after nerve block and group B receiving PRP 2 sessions of PRP 1 month apart intradermally in scalp after nerve block. Patients will receive exosomes at strength of 2 to 10 billion particles/5ml with 0.1 ml/cm2. Follow up will be done after 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 5 months and 6 months of completion of treatment to assess hair growth and reduce hair fall by Physian Global assessment (PGA), Patient global assessment (PtGA) and trichography. Clinical response will be graded as satisfactory (< 25%), good (25-50%) or excellent (> 50%) improvement. Details will be entered on predesigned proforma. Data will be entered and analyzed using SPSS 27. Means will be calculated for quantitative variables, frequencies for qualitative variables like pre- and post treatment response. Data will be stratified for role of effect modifiers
Laser sources have established their potential effect in inducing hair regrowth. No study has compared the effect of ablative fractional 2940-nm erbium yttrium aluminum garnet (Er: YAG) laser and non-fractional 15650nm fractional laser in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA).
Microneedling and autologous concentrated growth factor (CGF) have established their potential effect in inducing hair regrowth. No study has compared the effect of microneedling and CGF in the treatment of female androgenetic alopecia (AGA).
To investigate the efficacy of HMI-115 compared to placebo in treating Androgenic Alopecia patients for 24 weeks
A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of 40 male patients with androgenetic alopecia was conducted. All subject were randomized to receive either combination of minoxidil 5% topical and finasteride 0,1% topical or minoxidil 5% topical
The purpose of this 24-week study is to see if the SAGA-001 device is safe and effective at helping people with male pattern hair loss. Two different device configurations are being explored as part of this study. Device A has novel microneedles, lasers, and additional metal microneedles, while Device B only has novel microneedles and lasers. Participants will receive 12 treatments with either Device A or Device B over the course of 24 weeks. Treatments will be performed on-site every two weeks.
This is a multi-centers, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, Phase 2 Trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CKD-498 in female patients with Androgenetic Alopecia
Single-center, open-label, baseline-controlled, pilot study evaluating the use of a Nonablative 1470 nm laser for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia and scarring alopecia.
Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is a prevalent disease, occurring in 80% of Caucasian men and 50% of Caucasian women by age 701. Treatments for AGA are limited, and presently the only FDA-approved medications for AGA are topical minoxidil and oral finasteride1. In addition to medical therapies, FDA-cleared medical devices are now utilized for the treatment of AGA as of 20072. These devices, termed low level laser therapy (LLLT), come in multiple forms including combs, helmets and sports cap wearable devices2. These home-use, wearable devices utilize the ~650 nm wavelength laser light to stimulate the hair follicle mitochondria and thereby promote hair growth, a process termed "photobiomodulation"3. Recent meta-analyses investigating photobiomodulation and LLLT for AGA have noted an increase in fluence or energy delivered per cm is associated with increased hair density3. However, randomized control trials (RCT) with direct comparison of LLLT devices of different fluences has yet to be performed. Accordingly, in the present study we aim to investigate if increasing fluence in LLLT devices is associated with increased hair density by comparing sham LaserCap to LaserCap SD (1.15 J/cm2, low fluence) and LaserCap HD+ (3.93 J/cm2, high fluence) in RCT.