TITAN Trial: Reducing Phantom Limb Pain in People With Amputations

Amputation Clinical Trial

— TITAN  

Official title:

TITAN: a Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating the Effectiveness of Two Treatment Programs for Reducing Phantom Limb Pain Intensity and Its Interference With Function

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06167330
• Other study ID #: U1111-1296-2782
• Secondary ID: X23-0202 & 2023/
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: December 18, 2023
• Est. completion date: December 18, 2027

Study information

• Verified date: February 2024
• Source: Neuroscience Research Australia
• Contact: James H McAuley, PhD
• Phone: +61293991266
• Email: j.mcauley[@]neura.edu.au
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effectiveness of two rehabilitation programs for individuals who have undergone amputations and are experiencing phantom limb pain. The main question it aims to answer is:

• In individuals who have undergone amputations and are experiencing phantom limb pain, what is the effectiveness of a progressive rehabilitation program compared to a treatment program consisting of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and cranial electrical stimulation on reducing pain intensity and pain interference?

A total of 208 participants will be randomized into two groups: progressive rehabilitation program and stimulation devices. The progressive rehabilitation program includes pain science education, sensory training, and left/right judgements, imagined movements and mirror therapy. The treatment program for the group receiving the stimulation devices includes transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and cranial electrical stimulation. Both interventions will be delivered via eight, up to 1-hour telehealth sessions. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline and weeks 12, 24 and 52.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 208
• Est. completion date: December 18, 2027
• Est. primary completion date: December 18, 2026
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Experiencing phantom limb pain for at least three months.

• Report at least one episode of phantom limb pain in the previous week.

• Report at least 4 points in pain intensity over the previous 7 days, assessed using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale.

• Be a resident in Australia for the intervention and follow-up period.

• Have access to the internet and smart device (e.g., mobile phone).

• Be proficient in English.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Bilateral amputation.

• Scheduled for major surgery during the study period.

• Pain in the intact limb.

• Vision impairment that would preclude successful participation.

• Auditory impairment that would preclude successful participation.

• Cognitive problems that would preclude effective participation in trial procedures (e.g., Alzheimer's, dementia).

• Previously diagnosed neurological disorders that affect the movement of the intact limb (e.g., stroke, Parkinson, Multiple Sclerosis).

• Completed Graded Motor Imagery in the order of left/right judgements, imagined movements, and mirror therapy.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Amputation
• Phantom Limb
• Phantom Limb Pain

Intervention

Other:
• Progressive rehabilitation program
Twelve-week treatment program delivered via eight, up to 1-hour telehealth sessions. The first five sessions will be scheduled every week, and the final three sessions will be scheduled fortnightly. Participants will also be prescribed approximately 15-30 minutes of home activities daily. The treatment program includes pain science education, sensory training, implicit and explicit motor imagery, and mirror therapy. Participants will complete activities at a self-directed pace following a standard progression protocol. Participant adherence will be measured via session attendance and self-report therapy diaries.
• Stimulation devices
Twelve-week treatment program delivered via eight, up to 1-hour telehealth sessions. The first five sessions will be scheduled every week, and the final three sessions will be scheduled fortnightly. Participants will also be prescribed approximately 15-30 minutes of home activities daily. The treatment program includes transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and cranial electrical stimulation. Participants will complete activities at a self-directed pace following a standard progression protocol. Participant adherence will be measured via session attendance and self-report therapy diaries.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Australia	Neuroscience Research Australia	Randwick	New South Wales

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Neuroscience Research Australia

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Australia, 

References & Publications (1)

Limakatso K, Cashin AG, Williams S, Devonshire J, Parker R, McAuley JH. The Efficacy of Graded Motor Imagery and Its Components on Phantom Limb Pain and Disability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Can J Pain. 2023 May 17;7(1):2188899. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2023.2188899. eCollection 2023. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (mediator)	Pain self efficacy measured using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. The total score of this questionnaire ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy and functioning despite ongoing pain.	Weeks 6 and 10 post-randomisation
Other	Concept of Pain Inventory (mediator)	Beliefs and knowledge of pain science assessed using the Concept of Pain Inventory. This is a 13-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 52 points, with higher scores reflecting greater alignment with contemporary pain science.	Weeks 6 and 10 post-randomisation
Other	Pain Catastrophising Scale (mediator)	Pain catastrophising assessed using the Pain Catastrophising Scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating a higher level of catastrophising.	Weeks 6 and 10 post-randomisation
Other	Phantom limb movement scale (mediator)	The ability to move the phantom limb assessed on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (0: No movement at all, 10: Complete range of movement as if the limb were still present).	Weeks 6 and 10 post-randomisation
Other	Phantom limb body perception disturbance scale (mediator)	The phantom limb body perception disturbances assessed using 4 questions measuring ownership, awareness, attention and emotional feelings on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (range, 0-40; lower scores indicate more severe body perception disturbances). Adapted from the Bath Complex Regional Pain Syndrome body perception disturbance scale.	Weeks 6 and 10 post-randomisation
Primary	Pain intensity	Average pain intensity over the previous 7 days assessed using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale.	Week 12 post-randomisation
Primary	Pain interference	Average pain interference with function over the previous 7 days assessed using the 0-10 Pain Interference Scale of the Brief Pain Inventory.	Week 12 post-randomisation
Secondary	Pain intensity	Average pain intensity over the previous 7 days assessed using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale.	Weeks 24 and 52 post-randomisation
Secondary	Pain interference	Average pain interference with function over the previous 7 days assessed using the 0-10 Pain Interference Scale of the Brief Pain Inventory.	Weeks 24 and 52 post-randomisation
Secondary	Pain severity	Average pain intensity over the previous 7 days assessed using the 0-10 Pain Severity Scale of the Brief Pain Inventory.	Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
Secondary	Sleep subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory's Pain Interference Scale	Sleep Quality assessed using the Sleep subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory's Pain Interference Scale. The participants will rate the interference of pain with sleep on a 0-10 scale where "0" represents "does not interfere" and "10" represents "completely interferes".	Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
Secondary	PROMIS Self-Efficacy Manage Symptoms	Pain Self-efficacy assessed using PROMIS Self-Efficacy Manage Symptoms (Computer Adaptive Test) (28-item version; higher scores mean more self-efficacy).	Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
Secondary	PROMIS Depression	Emotional distress and depression assessed using PROMIS Depression (Computer Adaptive Test) (28-item version; higher scores mean more depression).	Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
Secondary	EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)	Health-Related Quality of Life assessed using the EQ-5D-5L dimensions scale range, 1-5; higher scores indicate better quality of life) and health thermometer (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate better quality of life).	Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
Secondary	Global Perceived Effect Scale	Perception of recovery assessed using the Global Perceived Effect scale (range from -5 to +5; higher scores mean greater improvement).	Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
Secondary	Adverse events	Adverse events assessed via self-report.	From randomisation to week 12 post-randomisation
Secondary	Adherence to treatment	Adherence to treatment assessed via session attendance and self-report (diary), including frequency per week and duration per day.	From randomisation to week 12 post-randomisation
Secondary	Total health-care costs	Total health-care costs will be estimated as the trial intervention costs and outside trial health-care resource use attributable to phantom limb pain from the Medicare Benefits Scheme and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from the EQ-5D-5L using the Australian utility weights will also be used in the trial-based cost-utility analysis.	Weeks 12, 24 and 52 post-randomisation
Secondary	Treatment rationale credibility	Treatment rationale credibility assessed using the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 48, with lower scores indicating lower credibility.	Week 1 post-randomisation

External Links

•   Trial website