Clinical Trials Logo

Ametropia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Ametropia.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04942925 Completed - Myopia Clinical Trials

Clinical Comparison of Two Daily Disposable Contact Lenses - Pilot Study 3

Start date: July 20, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the overall performance of PRECISION1™ contact lenses when compared to INFUSE™ contact lenses.

NCT ID: NCT04908488 Completed - Astigmatism Clinical Trials

Clinical Performance of Two Daily Disposable Toric Soft Contact Lenses

Start date: July 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical performance of PRECISION1™ for Astigmatism (P1fA) contact lenses with 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST® for ASTIGMATISM (AMfA) contact lenses.

NCT ID: NCT04714424 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Macular Degeneration

Comparing Vision Tests in a Virtual Reality Headset to Existing Analogues

RTS1
Start date: November 13, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The purpose of this study is to compare the results of vision tests that are algorithmically derived and delivered through a virtual reality headset with those delivered through the existing technology standards (eg. Humphrey for field tests). Tests that the researchers will be conducting include vision field perimetry, Amsler, acuity chart, contrast- sensitivity and currently used office tests.

NCT ID: NCT04698174 Completed - Ametropia Clinical Trials

Safety and Efficacy of a New Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Treatment

Start date: February 2, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a prospective, comparative, randomized, controlled, single-blind, single-surgeon, single-center PMCF clinical study whereby participants undergoing refractive surgery for correction of ametropia will receive a transepithelial PRK (tPRK) and conventional PRK treatment in the contralateral eye. To avoid bias in the clinical outcomes, the two PRK treatment options are randomized to the eyes of the patients based on ocular dominance. In addition, a 1:1 randomization is applied within the tPRK group to eyes with and without end-treatment laser polishing. Both procedures, standard PRK and tPRK, are performed in a one-step procedure. The main difference between the procedures is, that in conventional PRK, the epithelium will be removed using alcohol, whereas in tPRK procedures, the epithelium will be removed by laser ablation.

NCT ID: NCT04654455 Completed - Ametropia Clinical Trials

Prospective Study Evaluating Dry Eye in Patients Operated on for Ametropia by LASIK Surgery and Treated With REPADROP

PREPADROP
Start date: March 9, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

LASIK is a refractive surgery technique widely used in France. Postoperatively, the classic treatment after LASIK consists of instilling drops to reduce dry eyes. REPADROP® is an innovative eye drops stimulating corneal innervation. To date no study has quantified the improvement in dry eye syndrome and thus the quality of life of patients using REPADROP®.

NCT ID: NCT04632784 Recruiting - Myopia Clinical Trials

Clinical Trial With Artiflex Presbyopic

Start date: November 12, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the multifocal Artiflex Presbyopic intraocular lens.

NCT ID: NCT04617080 Completed - Ametropia Clinical Trials

Safety and Efficacy of Different Add Powers With a New Presbyopic Lasik Treatment Algorithm

Start date: January 26, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a prospective, comparative, randomized, controlled, open-label, single-surgeon, single-center PMCF clinical study whereby presbyopic patients undergoing refractive surgery will receive a SUPRACOR treatment for the correction in the non-dominant eye and a PROSCAN refractive treatment in the dominant eye to correct for ametropia. The participants will be randomized to either a SUPRACOR regular (100%) or SUPRACOR strong (130%) treatment with a 1:1 ratio.

NCT ID: NCT04532099 Completed - Refractive Errors Clinical Trials

Clinical Comparison of Two Daily Wear Frequent Replacement Silicone Hydrogel Soft Contact Lenses

Start date: September 9, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the overall performance of an investigational silicone hydrogel lens when compared to ACUVUE OASYS® with HYDRACLEAR® PLUS (AOHP).

NCT ID: NCT04525170 Withdrawn - Ametropia Clinical Trials

Clinical Evaluation of HPT Treated Rigid Contact Lenses Made From Hexafocon A

Start date: September 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This will be an up to six months, subject-masked, contralateral, parallel-group, randomised, daily wear study. All subjects will wear the Test lens in one eye and the Control lens in the other eye. Data from the first four weeks of Test and Control lens exposure will be used for the FDA 510 (k) submission.

NCT ID: NCT04185701 Completed - Eye Diseases Clinical Trials

Comparison of Subjective Refraction Measurement With SiVIEW Software and by an Expert

Start date: November 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Main objective Show that the equivalent sphere refraction measurements obtained by the SiVIEW software have no significant clinical difference with those obtained by an optometrist expert. Secondary objectives Show that the sphere refraction measurements obtained by the SiVIEW software have no significant clinical difference with those obtained by an optometrist expert. Show that the cylinder refraction measurements obtained by the SiVIEW software have no significant clinical difference with those obtained by an optometrist expert. Show that the visual acuity measurements obtained by the SiVIEW software do not have a significant clinical difference with those obtained by an optometrist expert. Demonstrate that the report delivered for each eye exam by SiVIEW software is consistent and relevant to a vision health practitioner. Show that the differences obtained between two eye examination experts are consistent with those found in the literature.