Ambulatory Surgical Procedures Clinical Trial
— PRODOUCH'EvalOfficial title:
Validation of Preoperative Shower Quality Assessment by ATPmetry
According to the 2013 guidelines of the French Society for Hospital Hygiene (SF2H), it is recommended to carry out at least one preoperative shower, with an antiseptic soap or a mild soap as close as possible to the operation. This preoperative shower aims to eliminate dirt and make the skin clean to facilitate the subsequent action of the antiseptic in the operating theatre. Thus, detersion is no longer carried out systematically but is only recommended in the presence of soiled skin. The preoperative shower, and the verification of its effectiveness, therefore become essential steps in the preoperative skin preparation. Indeed, the cleanliness of the skin influences the quality of the antisepsis performed in the operating theatre. Visual assessment of preoperative skin cleanliness by the nurse is currently the reference technique. However, a qualitative pilot study (Consiglio et al., Rech Soins Inf 2021) of nine obese patients and eleven surgical nurses revealed a lack of visual verification of skin cleanliness, which caregivers found difficult to perform. In a second multicentre study of 430 patients (Boulet et al., under review by Nursing Open), only 17% reported visual verification of skin cleanliness. Thus, this initial work highlights a barrier for caregivers to visually check preoperative skin cleanliness. The ATPmetry method was initially developed to assess the cleanliness of surfaces. In a second phase, the manufacturer (Hygiena®) showed through a study of 20 professionals that this method also allowed the evaluation of skin cleanliness of hands after washing. This method would have the advantage of being objective, potentially improving acceptability to caregivers and patients compared to direct visual inspection of skin cleanliness. Thus, ATPmetry appears to us as a method of interest for assessing preoperative skin cleanliness, but needs to be validated for this indication. To date, there is no other method than the simple subjective visual skin assessment by the caregiver, which is highly exposed to a bias of non-reproducibility and inter-observer variability.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 200 |
Est. completion date | June 1, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | April 1, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: Patients inclusion criteria: - Age greater than or equal to 18 years - patient with ambulatory surgical procedures - Patient scheduled for a surgical procedure for which the incision site is cutaneous - Patient covered by national health insurance - Patient having read and understood the information letter and having expressed oral non-opposition to the research Exclusion Criteria: The following patients will be excluded from the study - Patients scheduled for a surgical procedure with a muqueous incision site - patients < 18 ans - Pregnant or breastfeeding women - Patients who have not given their consent to participate or are unable to give consent |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | Rouen University Hospital | Rouen |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University Hospital, Rouen |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | innovative method | preoperative skin cleanliness as assessed by ATPmetry | before surgery | |
Primary | reference method | preoperative skin cleanliness as assessed by direct visual observation by a nurse | before surgery | |
Secondary | visual observation | Visual observation of the cleanliness of one of the two swabs before analysis by ATPmetry. This immediate observation will be made by a second nurse (unaware of the first nurse's judgement of skin cleanliness), who will assess skin cleanliness as "unsatisfactory" if the swab is stained. | before surgery |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03262090 -
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on the Prevention of Emergence Agitation in Children Undergoing Day Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03270033 -
Intravenous Dexmedetomidine, Dexamethasone and Interscalene Block Duration After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05613439 -
The Fast-track Centre for Hip and Knee Replacement Database
|
||
Completed |
NCT05915624 -
Tele Nursing Counseling on Anxiety and Patient Satisfaction in Same Day Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02037009 -
Centralised Anesthesic Monitoring in the Surgery of the Ocular Anterior Segment: Non Inferiority Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03038425 -
Does Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Block Improve the Quality of Recovery for Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients?
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04142203 -
Implementation of 23 Hour Surgery Model in a Tertiary Hospital
|
||
Completed |
NCT01382251 -
Functional Recovery and Caregiver Burden Following Surgery in the Elderly
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05018104 -
Risk Model for Severe Rebound Pain After Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery Involving Single-Shot Sciatic Nerve Blocks
|
||
Completed |
NCT04161586 -
Prilocaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Ambulatory Setting
|
||
Completed |
NCT03581097 -
Educational Video and Peri-operative Anxiety
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02980926 -
Mepivacaine vs. Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthetic in Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03193320 -
Management of Intraoperative Fluids in Ambulatory Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02813382 -
Spinal Anesthesia for Outpatient Abdominal Wall Surgery: Comparison of Bupivacaine, 2-chloroprocaine and Prilocaine
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01589796 -
Medial Versus Traditional Approach to US-guided TAP Blocks for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04787783 -
Evaluation of the Utility of Preanestes@s, a Web Based Application for Preoperative Assessment
|
N/A |