Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05389644 |
Other study ID # |
2022P001058 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
November 15, 2023 |
Est. completion date |
July 1, 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
October 2023 |
Source |
Massachusetts General Hospital |
Contact |
Mark Eldaief, MD |
Phone |
(617) 726-1728 |
Email |
meldaief[@]partners.org |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This proposal will demonstrate that non-invasive brain stimulation is able to modulate
cortico-striatal circuits in neurodegenerative patients with apathy, and that doing so
results in circuit-specific increases in FC and DA availability. These circuit changes will
be accompanied by changes in specific behavioral dimensions of apathy. This work will lead to
larger studies which develop personalized, circuit-specific neuromodulation strategies for AD
patients suffering from this intractable neuropsychiatric symptom.
Description:
Apathy is among the most common neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's Disease (AD), with
prevalence estimates up to 72%. Apathy in AD is associated with significant morbidity, high
caregiver burden, and is correlated with disease severity. While other behavioral symptoms
are clinically addressable in AD, there are currently no effective treatments for apathy.
Executive aspects of apathy involve deficits in goal-directed planning, rule maintenance,
cognitive flexibility, and set-shifting. Motivational aspects of apathy involve reward
anticipation, valuation of the effort needed to achieve a goal, and the consummatory
experience once a goal is achieved. Importantly, these discrete cognitive-behavioral
dimensions can be mapped onto discrete fronto-striatal circuits. For example, executive
deficits are likely to map onto dorsolateral prefrontal-striatal loops (a dorsal
apathy-related circuit). In contrast, motivational processing is localizable to projections
between the ventral striatum (VS) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), ventromedial
prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) (a ventral apathy-related circuit).
Dopamine (DA) supports processing in both the dorsal and ventral circuits, and there is
voluminous evidence that DA plays roles in encoding reward prediction/valuation and
motivation. For example, the ventral circuit receives dense monosynaptic dopaminergic
projections from the ventral tegmental area, and several studies have invoked this pathway in
reward processing. DA also plays a role in executive function. Moreover, apathy is observed
in patients with disorders of DA availability, in patients taking DA antagonists and with
lesions in the meso-cortico-limbic pathway. More specifically, AD patients exhibit decreased
striatal DA availability. Taken together, decreased DA transmission in the dorsal and ventral
circuits represent putative neurochemical mechanisms for apathy in AD.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is capable of modulating fMRI
resting-state functional connectivity (FC) in a circuit-specific manner. For example, our
group, as well as others, have demonstrated the feasibility of modulating network FC through
stimulation of a cortically accessible network node. Other studies have demonstrated
behavioral changes with circuit-specific neuromodulation. Prefrontal rTMS can also modulate
monoaminergic neurotransmitter release in a regionally specific way. For example,
intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS, a form of rTMS) increases tonic endogenous DA
release in animal models, and this effect can be blocked by DA receptor antagonists. There is
also evidence in humans that topographically specific changes in DA release can be elicited
based on the circuit stimulated. For instance, Strafella and colleagues used an rTMS-11C-
raclopride paradigm to show regionally specific changes in DA availability following
dorsolateral prefrontal (dlPFC) stimulation and primary motor cortex stimulation,
respectively. We recently extended this work by employing a combined MRI-PET paradigm with
11C-raclopride. In that protocol, three subjects underwent iTBS to two adjacent dlPFC
targets. These targets were functionally identified by the maximal FC with two dorsal
striatal regions: the left caudate and left putamen, and these were seeded based on
coordinates derived from large datasets. Targets were stimulated based on modeled E- field
distributions. As predicted, iTBS induced regionally specific changes in striatal DA
availability, with changes in 11C- raclopride binding potentials (BPND) occurring at the
sites of maximal FC with the respective iTBS targets.
Aim 1: To optimize rTMS targeting of apathy-relevant circuits in AD patients with apathy:
Hypothesis 1.1: FC estimates, acquired with accelerated multi-band imaging, will identify, on
an individualized basis, rTMS accessible cortical targets (e.g., in vmPFC/mOFC and in dlPFC)
which are most functionally coupled to relevant striatal regions (e.g., the VS and dorsal
caudate) in a group of AD patients with apathy. Hypothesis 1.2: State-of-the-art E-field
modeling will optimize coil position and orientation needed to best stimulate the
apathy-relevant circuits. Modeling will be informed by (a) structural estimates of cortical
atrophy, (b) diffusion MRI tractography estimates of white matter fiber bundles from cortical
targets.
Aim 2: To use rTMS to differentially modulate FC in apathy-relevant circuits in AD patients
with apathy: Hypothesis 2.1: rTMS to the dorsal circuit will increase FC specifically in the
dorsal circuit. Hypothesis 2.2: rTMS to the ventral circuit will increase FC specifically in
the ventral circuit. Hypothesis 2.3: Sham rTMS will not affect FC in either circuit.
Aim 3: To use rTMS to differentially modulate DA in apathy-relevant circuits in AD patients
with apathy: Hypothesis 3.1: rTMS to the dorsal circuit will increase DA availability, (as
measured by changes in 11C- raclopride binding potential (BPND)), specifically in the dorsal
circuit. Hypothesis 3.2: rTMS to the ventral circuit will increase DA availability
specifically in the ventral circuit. Hypothesis 3.3: Sham rTMS will not affect DA
availability in either circuit.
Aim 4: To assess behavioral changes induced by modulation of apathy-relevant circuits in AD
patients: Hypothesis 4.1: rTMS to the dorsal circuit will selectively improve executive
measures of goal-directed behavior, as assessed by fMRI task performance on planning portions
of the PACT. Hypothesis 4.2: rTMS to the vental circuit will selectively improve motivation
and reward anticipation, as assessed by fMRI task performance and activation on motivational
parts of the PACT, and on mood scales. Hypothesis 4.3: Sham rTMS will have no impact on fMRI
task performance or activation, nor on mood scales.